Skip to main content

Method, Meaning, New Formalism

  • Chapter
New Formalist Criticism
  • 169 Accesses

Abstract

It is a commonplace of contemporary ideas of knowledge, deriving most directly from Kantian epistemology in the eighteenth century that what we see or observe or know depends powerfully upon the point of view from which we know it. As one philosopher summarizes Kant’s central insight,

we know about the world insofar as we experience it according to the unchanging and universally shared structure of mind. All rational beings think the world in terms of space, time, and categories such as cause and effect, substance, unity, plurality, necessity, possibility and reality. That is, whenever we think about anything, we have to think about it in certain ways (for example, as having causes, as existing or not existing, as being one thing or many things, as being real or imaginary, as being something that has to exist or doesn’t have to exist), not because that is the way the world is, but rather because that is the way that our minds order experience. We can be said to know things about the world, then, not because we somehow step outside of our minds to compare what we experience with some reality outside of it, but rather because the world we know is always already organized according to a certain fixed (innate) pattern that is the mind.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Nelson Goodman, Ways of Worldmaking (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1978), x.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Stanley Fish, Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities (Cambridge, MA & London: Harvard Univ. Press, 1980), 322.

    Google Scholar 

  3. John M. Ellis, The Theory of Literary Criticism: A Logical Analysis (Berkeley & Los Angeles: Univ. of California Press, 1974)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Thomas S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1962), 5

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cleanth Brooks, The Well Wrought Urn: Studies in the Structure of Poetry (New York: Harcourt, 1947), 203.

    Google Scholar 

  6. David Lodge, Language of Fiction: Essays in Criticism and Verbal Analysis of the English Novel (N.Y: Columbia UP, 1966), 78.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jane Gallop, “The Ethics of Reading: Close Encounters,” Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 16:3 (2000), 12.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Theodor Adorno, Negative Dialectics, trans. E. B. Ashton (New York: Continuum, 1973), 33.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Paul Valéry to Philip Gust on, quoted in Dore Ashton, A Critical Study of Philip Guston (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1976), 132.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Henri Focillon, The Life of Forms in Art, trans. Charles B. Hogan and George Kubier (New York: Zone Books, 1992), 96

    Google Scholar 

  11. Northrop Frye, Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays (Princeton: Princeton UP, 1957), 5.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Archibald MacLeish, “Ars Poetica,” in Collected Poems 1917–1982 (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1985), 106–7.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wilbur Marshall Urban, Language and Reality: The Philosophy of Language and the Principles of Symbolism (New York: Macmillan, 1939), 262.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stephen Cohen, ed., Shakespeare and Historical Formalism (Aldershot, England: Ashgate, 2007), 3.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Geoffrey Hartman, “Beyond Formalism,” MLN, 81:5 (Dec. 1966), 545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bernard Shanatt, Reading Relations (Brighton: Harvester Press, 1982), 9–34

    Google Scholar 

  17. Robert Kaufman “Everybody Hates Kant: Blakean Formalism and the Symmetries of Laura Moriarty,” MLQ, 6:1 (March 2000), 141.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Emile Benveniste, Problems in General Linguistics, trans. Mary E. Meek (Coral Gables: Univ. of Miami Press, 1971), 46.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. Hillis Miller, The Linguistic Moment: From Wordsworth to Stevens (Princeton: Princeton UP, 1985), 26.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2013 Fredric V. Bogel

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bogel, F.V. (2013). Method, Meaning, New Formalism. In: New Formalist Criticism. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137362599_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics