Abstract
It is a commonplace of contemporary ideas of knowledge, deriving most directly from Kantian epistemology in the eighteenth century that what we see or observe or know depends powerfully upon the point of view from which we know it. As one philosopher summarizes Kant’s central insight,
we know about the world insofar as we experience it according to the unchanging and universally shared structure of mind. All rational beings think the world in terms of space, time, and categories such as cause and effect, substance, unity, plurality, necessity, possibility and reality. That is, whenever we think about anything, we have to think about it in certain ways (for example, as having causes, as existing or not existing, as being one thing or many things, as being real or imaginary, as being something that has to exist or doesn’t have to exist), not because that is the way the world is, but rather because that is the way that our minds order experience. We can be said to know things about the world, then, not because we somehow step outside of our minds to compare what we experience with some reality outside of it, but rather because the world we know is always already organized according to a certain fixed (innate) pattern that is the mind.1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Nelson Goodman, Ways of Worldmaking (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1978), x.
Stanley Fish, Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities (Cambridge, MA & London: Harvard Univ. Press, 1980), 322.
John M. Ellis, The Theory of Literary Criticism: A Logical Analysis (Berkeley & Los Angeles: Univ. of California Press, 1974)
Thomas S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1962), 5
Cleanth Brooks, The Well Wrought Urn: Studies in the Structure of Poetry (New York: Harcourt, 1947), 203.
David Lodge, Language of Fiction: Essays in Criticism and Verbal Analysis of the English Novel (N.Y: Columbia UP, 1966), 78.
Jane Gallop, “The Ethics of Reading: Close Encounters,” Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 16:3 (2000), 12.
Theodor Adorno, Negative Dialectics, trans. E. B. Ashton (New York: Continuum, 1973), 33.
Paul Valéry to Philip Gust on, quoted in Dore Ashton, A Critical Study of Philip Guston (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1976), 132.
Henri Focillon, The Life of Forms in Art, trans. Charles B. Hogan and George Kubier (New York: Zone Books, 1992), 96
Northrop Frye, Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays (Princeton: Princeton UP, 1957), 5.
Archibald MacLeish, “Ars Poetica,” in Collected Poems 1917–1982 (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1985), 106–7.
Wilbur Marshall Urban, Language and Reality: The Philosophy of Language and the Principles of Symbolism (New York: Macmillan, 1939), 262.
Stephen Cohen, ed., Shakespeare and Historical Formalism (Aldershot, England: Ashgate, 2007), 3.
Geoffrey Hartman, “Beyond Formalism,” MLN, 81:5 (Dec. 1966), 545.
Bernard Shanatt, Reading Relations (Brighton: Harvester Press, 1982), 9–34
Robert Kaufman “Everybody Hates Kant: Blakean Formalism and the Symmetries of Laura Moriarty,” MLQ, 6:1 (March 2000), 141.
Emile Benveniste, Problems in General Linguistics, trans. Mary E. Meek (Coral Gables: Univ. of Miami Press, 1971), 46.
J. Hillis Miller, The Linguistic Moment: From Wordsworth to Stevens (Princeton: Princeton UP, 1985), 26.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Fredric V. Bogel
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bogel, F.V. (2013). Method, Meaning, New Formalism. In: New Formalist Criticism. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137362599_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137362599_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-47272-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-36259-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)