Abstract
This chapter considers the different theories that have been advanced over the last century to explain combat motivation and combat demotivation (a term used here to cover a range of conditions including but not restricted to combat breakdown, post-traumatic stress disorder and so on), all of which have in common that they are associated with men ceasing to fight.1 The chapter looks specifically at what makes men fight, because nearly all the literature for the last hundred years is about men. As a way of getting at such a vast and complex subject, the chapter presents three vignettes, each a moment in time, that illustrate the changing views of combat demotivation over the last century.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
This chapter started life as Simon Wessely, ‘Twentieth-Century Theories on Combat Motivation and Breakdown’, Journal of Contemporary History, vol. 41/2 (2006): 268–86.
Paul Lerner, Hysterical Men: War, Psychiatry and the Politics of Trauma in Germany 1890–1930 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2003).
Edgar Jones and Simon Wessely ‘Forward Psychiatry in the Military: Its Origins and Effectiveness’, Journal of Traumatic Stress, vol. 16/3 (2003): 411–19.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Simon Wessely
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wessely, S. (2014). Why Soldiers Don’t Fight. In: Scheipers, S. (eds) Heroism and the Changing Character of War. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137362537_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137362537_20
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-47270-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-36253-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)