Skip to main content

The Real Internet

  • Chapter
Žižek and Media Studies
  • 470 Accesses

Abstract

At first glance, Slavoj Žižek’s writings on cyberspace from the late 1990s don’t hold up. The primary problem is the separation of cyberspace, or virtual reality, from the communicative exchanges that are part of everyday life in real capitalism. When Žižek wrote these pieces, computer-mediated interactions seemed to be on their way to constituting a new, separate reality that people might “jack into” (William Gibson had already supplied a compelling term for this cybernetic space in his 1984 novel, Neuromancer). Nineties theorists of technoculture, virtual reality, and cyberspace focused on the lawlessness of this new realm, particularly on the ways its anonymous, real-time, textual interface facilitated identity play and sexual experimentation.2 That cyberspace was considered a separate domain let Žižek treat it not only as a world with its own dynamics, but more fundamentally as a specific sociocultural symptom. Thus, much as the neuroses of Freud’s hysterics provided a point of access into the pathologies of bourgeois modernity, so did the psychotic character of virtual communities enable Žižek to begin theorizing the decline of symbolic efficiency constitutive of the “postmodern constellation.”3 My intent here is to reconsider Žižek’s early account of cyberspace in light of the intensifications of communicative capitalism. What appear as glitches, I argue, open up the possibility of theorizing the Internet as Real. Networked media’s capture of subjects follows the circular movement of the drives.

I am grateful to Justin Clemens and Dominic Pettman for their critical remarks on an initial draft of this essay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. For an overview that emphasizes the debate over subjectivity, identity, and the body, see Jay David Bolter and Richard Grusin, Remediation: Understanding New Media (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002). To be sure, these were not the only approaches taken to networked media; however, they were crucial steps for humanities scholars’ rejection of the assumption that computers were necessarily tools of control and alienation rather than opportunities for transgression and creativity.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Slavoj Žižek, The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Centre of Political Ontology (New York: Verso, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Žižek, The Indivisible Remainder: On Schelling and Related Matters (New York: Verso, 1996), 193.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Žižek, The Plague of Fantasies (New York: Verso, 1997), 134.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Žižek: “In short, the properly dialectical paradox resides in the fact that the very ‘empirical’, explicit realization of a principle undermines its reign” (1996: 195).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Friedrich Kittler, Gramophone, Film, Typewriter, trans. Geoffrey Winthrop-Young and Michael Wutz (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1999), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Žižek , 1997, 164. The description of Kittler is from Mark Hansen, New Philosophy for New Media (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2004), 70.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See Jodi Dean, Democracy and Other Neoliberal Fantasies (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2009).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Jacques, Lacan, Seminar XI: The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis, ed. Jacques-Alain Miller, trans. Alan Sheridan (New York: Norton, 1981), 103.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Žižek in Judith Butler, et al., Contingency, Hegemony, Universality: Contemporary Dialogues on the Left (New York: Verso, 2000), 117.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Žižek, Tarrying with the Negative: Kant, Hegel, and the Critique of Ideology (Durham, N.C.: Duke, 1993), 197.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Joan Copjec, Imagine There’s No Woman: Ethics and Sublimation (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2002), 213–214.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Žižek, In Defense of Lost Causes (New York: Verso, 2008), 328.

    Google Scholar 

  14. From the Introductory Lectures, quoted by Lacan, Seminar VII: The Ethics of Psychoanalysis, ed. Jacques-Alain Miller, trans. Dennis Porter (New York: Norton, 1997), 71.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Žižek, The Parallax View (Cambridge, MA: MIT, 2006), 26.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Andrejevic (2007) documents the cycle of suspicion with respect to forms of peer-to-peer monitoring and surveillance. See Mark Andrejevic, iSpy: Suveillance and Power in the Interactive Era (Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Matthew Flisfeder Louis-Paul Willis

Copyright information

© 2014 Matthew Flisfeder and Louis-Paul Willis

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dean, J. (2014). The Real Internet. In: Flisfeder, M., Willis, LP. (eds) Žižek and Media Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137361516_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics