Skip to main content

Productive Interactions: Geography and the Humanities

  • Chapter
Humanities in the Twenty-First Century
  • 211 Accesses

Abstract

What are the relevance, the purpose, and the role of the broad disciplinary construct of th e humanities in higher education and in wider society today? As a social scientist — a geographer in the nature-society tradition (described below) — how do I and others in my field engage with the humanities?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adams, C. (1994) Neither Man nor Beast: Feminism and the Defense of Animals, New York: Continuum International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, K. (1997) ‘A walk on the wild side: a critical geography of domestication’, Progress in Human Geography, 21, 463–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrows, H. (1923) ‘Geography as human ecology’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 13(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Jr., C. F. (1960) ‘Cultural animal geography: an inviting field of research’, The Professional Geographer, 12(5), 12–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J. (1979) Pig Earth, New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J. (1983) Once in Europa, New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J. (1990) Lilac and Flag, New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergson, H. (1983[1907]) Creative Evolution, trans. A. Mitchell, Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliwise, R. J. (2011) ‘Renovation project’, Duke Magazine, January–February, 32–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, W. and Watts, M. (1997) ‘Agro-industrial just-in-time: the chicken industry in postwar American Capitalism’, in D. Goodman and M. Watts (eds), Globalising Food: Agrarian Questions and Global Restructuring, 192–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1993) Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calarco, M. (2008) Zoographies: The Question of the Animal from Heidegger to Derrida, New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove, D. (2011) ‘Geography within the humanities’, in S. Daniels, D. DeLyser, J. N. Entrikin, and D. Richardson (eds), Envisioning Landscapes, Making Worlds: Geography and the Humanities, Routledge: London and New York, xxii–xxv.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, S., DeLyser, D., Entrikin, J. N. and Richardson, D. (2011) Envisioning Landscapes, Making Worlds: Geography and the Humanities, Routledge: London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. 1964 [1859] On the Origin of Species, 1st edn, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, G. (2006) ‘Patterning the geographies of organ transplantation: corporeality, generosity and justice’, in Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 31(3): 257–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dear, M. (2011) ‘Afterword: historical moments in the rise of the geohumanities’, in M. Dear, J. Ketchum, S. Luria, and D. Richardson (eds), Geohumanities: Art, History, Text at the Edge of Place, Routledge: London and New York, 309–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. (1988 [1980]) A Thousand Plateaus. Capitalism and Schizophrenia, trans. B. Massumi, London: Athlone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demeritt, D. (2001) ‘The construction of global warming and the politics of science’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91(2), 307–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (2008) The Animal That Therefore I Am. M. Mallet, ed. and D. Wills, trans., New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emel, J. (1998) ‘Are you man enough, big and bad enough? Wolf eradication in the US’, in J. Wolch and J. Emel (eds), Animal Geographies: Place, Politics, and Identity in the Nature-Culture Borderlands, London: Verso, 91–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emel, J. and Urbanik, J. (2005) ‘The new species of capitalism: an ecofemi-nist comment on animal biotechnology’, in L. Nelson and J. Seager (eds), A Companion to Feminist Geography, Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, Ltd, 445–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977, New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1982) ‘The subject and power’, in H. Dreyfus and P. Rabinow (eds), Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuration and Hermeneutics, Hemel Hempstead, Herts: Harvester Press, 208–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1986) ‘Of other spaces’, in Diacritics, 16, 22–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grandin, T. and Johnson, C. (2005) Animals in Translation: Using the Mysteries of Autism to Decode Animal Behavior, New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, S. (1999) ‘Isms and schisms: healing the rift between the nature-society and space-society traditions in human geography’, Annals AAG, 89, 133–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1991) Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1992) ‘The promises of monsters: a regenerative politics for inappropriate/d others’, in L. Grossberg, C. Melson, and P. A. Treichler (eds), Cultural Studies, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1997) Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium. FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (2007) When Species Meet, Minneapolis: Univ of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (1990) ‘Feminism, science, and anti-enlightenment critiques’, in L. Nicholson (ed.), Feminism/Postmodernism, New York: Routledge, 83–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (1991) Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (2008) Sciences from Below: Feminisms, Postcolonialities, and Modernities, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1962) Being and Time, trans. J. MacQuarrie and E. Robinson, New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henson, M. (Summer 2011) ‘What does it mean to be human?’ Wake Forest Magazine, 46–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinchliffe, S., Kearnes, M., Degen, M. and Whatmore, S. (2005) ‘Urban wild things: a cosmopolitical experiment’, in Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 23, 643–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, L. (2007) ‘Subjecting cows to robots: farming technologies and the making of animal subjects’, in Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 25, 1041–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2000) The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill, London and New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, Catherine (2008) ‘Beyond the clearing: towards a dwelt animal geography’, in Progress in Human Geography, 32(5), 633–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, O. (2000) ‘(Un)ethical geographies of human-non-human relations: encounters, collectives and spaces’, in C. Philo and C. Wilbert (eds), Animal Spaces, Beastly Places: New Geographies of Human-animal Relations, London: Routledge, 268–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerski, J. (2011) ‘Why geography education matters’, in AAG Newsletter, 46(5), 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1991) The Production of Space, trans. D. Nicholson-Smith, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, E. (1969) Totality and Infinity, Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, E. (1981) Otherwise than Being, or Beyond Essence, Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, D. N. (2007) ‘Science, speech and space: scientific knowledge and the spaces of rhetoric’, in History of the Human Sciences, 20, 71–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, D. N. (2010) ‘Landscapes of knowledge’, in P. Meusburger, D. Livingstone and H. Jons (eds) Geographies of Science, Electronic book: Springer Science + Business Media. http://www.springerlink.com/content/978–90-481–8610-5. 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorimer, H. (2006) ‘Herding memories of humans and animals’, in Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 24(4), 497–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lulka, D. (2009) ‘The residual humanism of hybridity: retaining a sense of the earth’, in Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 34, 378–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J. (1979) The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, S. (2002) ‘Bringing up babe’, Camera Obscura, 49, 149–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, M. (1997) Feminism and Ecology, New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, C. (1980) The Death of Nature, San Francisco: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newbigin, M. (1913) Animal Geography, Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philo, C. and Wilbert, C. (2000) Animal Spaces, Beastly Places: New geographies of human-animal relations, Routledge: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plumwood, V. (1993) Feminism and the Mastery of Nature, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, R. C. (2007) ‘Geographies of science: histories, localities, practices, futures’, in Progress in Human Geography, 31(3), 309–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (2005) A Theory of Justice, London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan, T. (1998) ‘The case for animal rights’, in S. M. Cahn and P. Markie (eds), Ethics: History, Theory and Contemporary Issues, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salleh, A. (1997) Ecofeminism as Politics: Nature, Marx, and the Postmodern, London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, C. (1925) ‘The morphology of landscape’, in University of California Publications in Geography, 2(2), 19–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, C. (1952) Seeds, Spades, Hearths and Herds, American Geographical Society .

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiebinger, L. (1993) Nature’s Body: Gender in the Making of Modern Science, Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleidt, W. M. and Shalter, M. D. (2003) ‘Co-evolution of humans and canids: an alternative view of dog domestication: Homo Homini Lupus?’ Evolution and Cognition, 9(1), 57–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serres, M. (1985) Les cinq sens, Paris: Grasset.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shukin, N. (2009) Animal Capital: Rendering Life in Biopolitical Times, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. (1993) Practical Ethics, 2nd edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins, J. (1993) West of Everything: The Inner Life of Westerns, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuan, Y. F. (1984) Dominance and Affection: The Making of Pets, New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B. L., II. (2002) ‘Contested identities: human-environment geography and disciplinary implications in a restructuring academy’, in Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92(1), 52–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. (2010) ‘The rule of thumb’, in JAC, 30(3–4), 711–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, K. (1987) ‘Feminism and ecology: making connections’, Environmental Ethics, 9, 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whatmore, S. (2002) Hybrid Geographies: Natures Cultures Spaces, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Withers, C. (2002) ‘The geography of scientific knowledge’, in N. Rupke (ed.), Göttingen and the Development of the Natural Sciences, Göttingen, Germany: Wallstein Verlag, 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolch, J. and Emel, J. (1998) Animal Geographies: Place, Politics, and Identity in the Nature-Culture Borderlands, Verso: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, C. (2003) Animal Rites: American Culture, the Discourse of Species, and Posthumanist Theory, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerer, K. S. (2010) ‘Retrospective on nature-society geography: tracing trajectories (1911–2010) and reflecting on translations’, in Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 100(5), 1076–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Connie Johnston

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Johnston, C. (2013). Productive Interactions: Geography and the Humanities. In: Belfiore, E., Upchurch, A. (eds) Humanities in the Twenty-First Century. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137361356_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics