Skip to main content

From Status to Corpus: Codification and Implementation of Spelling Norms in Luxembourgish

  • Chapter
Language Planning and Microlinguistics

Abstract

This chapter is concerned with reconstructing the processes of codification and implementation of orthography by exploring how certain norms find their way into actual language use. The test case chosen here is the codification and subsequent implementation of orthography in Luxembourgish. As a primarily spoken language, originating from a Central Franconian dialect and achieving high positive prestige as the national language since the end of the nineteenth century, Luxembourgish can today be regarded as an Aus bau language, which has conquered several new domains. Although historically closely related to German, Luxembourgish is today evaluated by the speech community as an autonomous language. Learned as the first language of the majority of Luxembourgers, the language is embedded in a complex multilingual setting where it shares domains and functions with German and French (see Horner and Weber, 2008; Fehlen, 2009). Because of a high proportion of foreign residents due to immigration (44 per cent), the language situation is characterized by extensive multilingualism, French predominating (see Fehlen, 2011). While both German and French are intensively taught in school, Luxembourgish, although the first language of approximately 60 per cent of the population, forms only a rudimentary part of the school curriculum.

I would like to thank Julia de Bres and the editors Wini Davies and Evelyn Ziegler for valuable input to the present chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ammon, U. (2003) ‘On the social forces that determine what is standard in a language and on conditions of successful implementation’, Socidinguistica, 17, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Androutsopoulos, J. (2003) ‘Online-Gemeinschaften und Sprachvariation. Soziolinguistische Perspektiven auf Sprache im Internet’, Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik, 31, 173–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Androutsopoulos, J. (2011) ‘Language change and digital media: A review of conceptions and evidence’ in T. Rristiansen and N. Coupland (eds) Standard Languages and Language Standards in a Changing Europe (Oslo: No vus Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, N. (2013) Standardization, Ideology and Linguistics (Basingstoke and New York: Pal grave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, G. (2006) ‘Abschied vom Dialekt. Zur lëtzebuergeschen belletristischen Gegenwartsliteratur’ in C. Moulin and D. Nühling (eds) Perspektiven einer linguistischen Luxemburgistik. Studien zu Diachronie und Synchronie (Heidelberg: Winter).

    Google Scholar 

  • Evangeliar (2009) Lëtzebuerger Evangeliar (Luxembourg: éditions saint-paul).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehlen, F. (2009) BaleineBis: une enquête sur un marché linguistique multilingue en profonde mutation = Luxemburgs Sprachenmarkt im Wandel (Luxembourg: SESOPI Centre intercommaunitaire).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehlen, F. (2011) ‘Le statut du français sur le marché linguistique du Luxembourg-Le choix de la langue comme enjeu d’un champ scientifiqie en devenir’ in P. Gilles and M. Wagner (eds) Linguistische und soziolinguistische Bausteine der Luxemburgistik (Frankfurt a. Main: Peter Lang).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilles, P. (2006) ‘Dialektausgleich im Luxemburgischen’ in C. Moulin and D. Nübling (eds) Perspektiven einer linguistischen Luxemburgistik. Studien zu Diachronie und Synchronie (Heidelberg: Winter).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilles, P. (2009) ‘Jugendsprachliche Schriftlichkeit auf Luxemburgisch in den Neuen Medien’ in C. Berg, L. Kerger, N. Meisch and M. Milmeister (eds) Savoirs et engagements. Hommage à Georges Wirtgen (Differdange: Éditions Phi).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilles, P. (2011) ‘Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit in der luxemburgischen Sprachgemeinschaft’ in G. Mein and H. Sieburg (eds) Medien des Wissens. Interdisziplinäre Aspekte von Medialität (Bielefeld: transcript).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilles, P. and Moulin, C. (2003) ‘Luxembourgish’ in A. Deumert and W. Vanden-bussche (eds) Germanic Standardizations: Past to present (Philadelphia: Benjamins).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilles, P. and Trouvain, J. (2013) ‘Luxembourgish’, Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 43(1), 67–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haugen, E. (1966) ‘Linguistics and language planning’ in W. Bright (ed.) Sociolinguistics. Proceedings of the UCLA Sociolinguisti.es Conference, 1964 (The Hague and Paris: Mouton).

    Google Scholar 

  • Horner, K. and Weber, J. J. (2008) ‘The language situation in Luxembourg’, Current Issues in Language Planning, 9(1), 69–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A., Androutsopoulos, J., Sebba, M. and Johnson, S. (2012) Orthography as Social Action: Scripts, spelling, identity and power (Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • LOD (2007ff.) Lëtzebuerger Online Dictionnaire — LOD. http://www.lod.lu/lod/ date accessed 31 January 2011.

  • LWB (1950–1977) Luxemburger Wörterbuch (5 vols) (Luxemburg). http://engelmann.uni.lu:8080/portal/wbb/woert erbuecher/lwb/wbgui

  • Mattheier, K. J. (1991) ‘Standardsprache als Sozialsymbol. Über kommunikativen gesellschaftlichen Wandels’ in R. Wimmer (ed.) Das 19. Jahrhundert. Sprachgeschichtliche Wurzeln des heutigen Deutsch (Berlin: de Gruyter).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mémorial (1946) ‘Arrêté ministériel du 5 juin 1946 portant fixation d’un système d’orthographe luxembourgeoise’, in Mémorial du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg, 40, 637–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mémorial (1976) ‘Arrêté ministériel du 10 octobre 1975 portant réforme d’un système officiel d’orthographe luxembourgeoise’, in Mémorial B — Journal Officiel du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg, 68, 1365–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mémorial (1999) ‘Reglement grand-ducal du 30 juillet 1999 portant réforme du système officiel d’orthographe luxembourgeoise’, in Mémorial A — Journal Officiel du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg, 112, 2040–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, G. (1993) ‘Allophonic variation in Luxembourgish palatal and alveolar-palatal fricatives: Discussion of an areal survey taken in 1979’ in J. L. Flood, P. Salmon, O. Syce and C. Wells (eds) ‘Das unsichtbare Band der Sprache’. Studies in German Language and Linguistic History in Memory of Leslie Seiffert (Stuttgart: Akademischer Verlag).

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, G. (2000) ‘The spelling of Luxembourgish: Systems and developments since 1824’ in G. Newton (ed.) Essays on Politics, Language and Society in Luxembourg (Lewiston: Edwin Mellon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Vienna, Austria). http://www.R-project.org

  • Sebba, M. (2007) Spelling and Society: The culture and politics of orthography around the world (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sebba, M. (2009) ‘Sociolinguistic approaches to writing systems research’, Writing Systems Research, 1(1), 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shortis, T. (2009) ‘Revoicing TXT. Spelling, vernacular orthography and “unregi-mented writing”’ in S. Wheeler (ed.) Connected Minds, Emerging Cultures: Cybercultures in online learning (Charlotte, NC: Information Age Pub).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tagg, C. (2009) ‘A corpus linguistics study of SMS text messaging’, PhD thesis, University of Birmingham, http://etheses.bham.ac.uk/ 253/l/Tagg09PhD.pdf, date accessed 1 October 2013.

  • Tophinke, D. (2002) ‘Schreiben gegen die Regel — Formen und Funktionen orthografischer Abweichungen im Internet Relay Chat (IRC)’ in M. Bommes, C. Noack and D. Tophinke (eds) Sprache als Form. Festschrift für Utz Maas (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag).

    Google Scholar 

  • Welter, N. (1914) Das Luxemburgische und sein Schrifttum, 1st edn (Luxemburg: G. Soupert).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Peter Gilles

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gilles, P. (2015). From Status to Corpus: Codification and Implementation of Spelling Norms in Luxembourgish. In: Davies, W.V., Ziegler, E. (eds) Language Planning and Microlinguistics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137361240_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics