Skip to main content
  • 249 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter deals with films in which technology and technological devices are portrayed as demonized or haunted. Just in the past forty years, there have been a number of popular films concerning such “ghosts in the machine.”1 These films come in many forms: those that deal with normally nonsentient machines, like John Carpenter’s Christine (1983) or Stephen King’s Maximum Overdrive (1986); those that deal with cybernetic organisms, like the Terminator series (James Cameron, 1984, 1991; Jonathan Mostow, 2003; McG, 2009) and Spielberg’s AI: Artificial Intelligence (2001); and those that focus on media or communications technology, like Cronenberg’s Videodrome (1983) and the Poltergeist series (Hooper, 1982; Brian Gibson, 1986; Gary Sherman, 1988) or, more recently, The Matrix trilogy (Wachowski Brothers, 1999, 2003, 2003), Gore Verbinski’s The Ring (2002), and William Malone’s Feardotcom (2002). In this last category, we might also include Wes Craven’s New Nightmare (1994) and Carpenter’s In the Mouth of Madness (1995), in which the demon has entered into the process of horror production itself. In all cases, a will, spirit, or consciousness is attributed to nonhuman, inorganic devices. Endowed with these new powers, such devices and the creatures that sometimes emerge from them threaten humanity and human-centered reality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. With the exception of Feardotcom, which borrows heavily from The Ring, all of these films are remakes of Japanese films of the same name. Despite their similarities, the significance of the films for each culture is very different. For important discussions of the transcultural nature of these films, see, for example, Jay McRoy’s Nightmare Japan (Rodopi, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. and Kristen Lacefield’s The Scary Screen (Ashgate, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Though this techno-virus does cause some physical symptoms, it is not as explicitly linked to the notion of “body horror” as, for example, Cronenberg’s Videodrome (1983), in which a videotape itself is literally lodged in a man’s body. Because of the increasingly airy and largely invisible nature of communications technology, its intrusions into the body are less obvious and more insidious.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Mark Seltzer’s Serial Killers: Death and Life in America’s Wound Culture (Routledge, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2013 Kimberly Jackson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jackson, K. (2013). The Image Goes Viral—Virtual Hauntings in The Ring and Feardotcom. In: Technology, Monstrosity, and Reproduction in Twenty-First Century Horror. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137360267_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics