Abstract
This chapter deals with films in which technology and technological devices are portrayed as demonized or haunted. Just in the past forty years, there have been a number of popular films concerning such “ghosts in the machine.”1 These films come in many forms: those that deal with normally nonsentient machines, like John Carpenter’s Christine (1983) or Stephen King’s Maximum Overdrive (1986); those that deal with cybernetic organisms, like the Terminator series (James Cameron, 1984, 1991; Jonathan Mostow, 2003; McG, 2009) and Spielberg’s AI: Artificial Intelligence (2001); and those that focus on media or communications technology, like Cronenberg’s Videodrome (1983) and the Poltergeist series (Hooper, 1982; Brian Gibson, 1986; Gary Sherman, 1988) or, more recently, The Matrix trilogy (Wachowski Brothers, 1999, 2003, 2003), Gore Verbinski’s The Ring (2002), and William Malone’s Feardotcom (2002). In this last category, we might also include Wes Craven’s New Nightmare (1994) and Carpenter’s In the Mouth of Madness (1995), in which the demon has entered into the process of horror production itself. In all cases, a will, spirit, or consciousness is attributed to nonhuman, inorganic devices. Endowed with these new powers, such devices and the creatures that sometimes emerge from them threaten humanity and human-centered reality.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
With the exception of Feardotcom, which borrows heavily from The Ring, all of these films are remakes of Japanese films of the same name. Despite their similarities, the significance of the films for each culture is very different. For important discussions of the transcultural nature of these films, see, for example, Jay McRoy’s Nightmare Japan (Rodopi, 2008)
and Kristen Lacefield’s The Scary Screen (Ashgate, 2010).
Though this techno-virus does cause some physical symptoms, it is not as explicitly linked to the notion of “body horror” as, for example, Cronenberg’s Videodrome (1983), in which a videotape itself is literally lodged in a man’s body. Because of the increasingly airy and largely invisible nature of communications technology, its intrusions into the body are less obvious and more insidious.
See Mark Seltzer’s Serial Killers: Death and Life in America’s Wound Culture (Routledge, 1998).
Copyright information
© 2013 Kimberly Jackson
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jackson, K. (2013). The Image Goes Viral—Virtual Hauntings in The Ring and Feardotcom. In: Technology, Monstrosity, and Reproduction in Twenty-First Century Horror. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137360267_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137360267_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-47220-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-36026-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Media & Culture CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)