Skip to main content
  • 213 Accesses

Abstract

On 25 March 1851, Thomas Drory and Sarah Chesham were hanged. Drory had been convicted of murder, Chesham for poisoning with intent. This difference in offences would continue to be significant in affecting what happened to the two bodies after their deaths, reflecting societal attitudes to the two types of crimes. The bodies of those found guilty of murder would be buried in the grounds of the jail where they were hanged; those found guilty of lesser crimes could be buried wherever they wished. Thus, while Drory’s body was buried in the yard of Chelmsford Gaol, Philip Chesham, Sarah Chesham’s eldest son, arranged to have her body taken back to Clavering and buried in the village churchyard.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. R. Richardson (1987). Death, Dissection and the Destitute: The Politics of the Corpse in Pre-Victorian Britain. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  2. K. Watson (2010) Poisoned Lives: English Poisoners and their Victims. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Levi (1991) On Microhistory. In P. Burke (ed.), New Perspectives on Historical Writing. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. Muir and G. Ruggiero (1991) Microhistory & the Lost Peoples of Europe. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. Ginzburg (1989) Clues, Myths and the Historical Method. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Wiener (1999 Autumn) Judges v. Jurors: Courtroom Tensions in Murder Trials and the Law of Criminal Responsibility in Nineteenth-Century England. Law and History Review. 17(3), 467–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2015 Victoria M. Nagy

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nagy, V.M. (2015). Conclusion. In: Nineteenth-Century Female Poisoners. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137359308_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137359308_8

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-47148-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-35930-8

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics