Skip to main content

Managing Sex Offenders in the UK: Challenges for Policy and Practice

  • Chapter
Responding to Sexual Offending

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Risk, Crime and Society ((PSRCS))

Abstract

The community management of sex offenders has attracted much media and political interest in recent times, not least due to high-profile failures in risk management (Kitzinger, 2004; Thomas, 2013), as well as issues both historic (e.g., Welsh care home scandal, the Jimmy Savile case) and contemporary (e.g., the Ian Wakins case) with the policing of sexual offenders. This has resulted in increased policy concern with sex offenders, and practice developments at both the individual practice level and in multi-agency working (see Kemshall and Wood, 2009). Community supervision and management of sex offenders, particularly those considered ‘high risk’ was given added impetus in the 1990s and into the twenty-first century by the ‘discovery’ of the predatory paedophile (Kitzinger, 1999; Silverman and Wilson, 2002) and fuelled by the infamous case of Sydney Cooke,1 and various studies that established the extent of sexual offending both nationally and internationally (e.g., Grub in 1998). Whilst the accuracy of prevalence studies can be debated (Matravers, 2003), there are research estimates that 1 in 6 children will be the victim of sexual offending (Cawson et al., 2000); with 18,915 children under 16 being the victim of sexual abuse in England and Wales in 2012–2013, approximately 35% of all sexual crimes in this period (Office for National Statistics, 2013). Ministry of Justice (MoJ, 2013a, pp. 6–7) figures state that ‘[b]ased on aggregated data from the “Crime Survey for England and Wales” 2009–2012, on average, 2.5% of females and 0.4% of males said that they had been a victim of a sexual offences (including attempts) in the previous 12 months’, and in 2011–2012, police recorded a total of 53,700 sexual offences across England and Wales.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Brown, J., O’Donnell, J. and Erooga, M. (2011). Sexual abuse: A public health challenge. London: NSPCC. Available at http://www.nspcc.org.uk/inform/ resourcesforprofessionals/sexualabuse/evidence-review-pdf_wdf87818.pdf (accessed 24 June 2015).

  • Brown, S. (2009) Attitudes towards sex offenders and there rehabilitation: A special case?. In J. Wood and T. Gannon (eds) Public opinion and criminal justice. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, D. (2010). Government launches big society programme. 18 May. Available at http://www.numberlO.gov.uk/news/big-society/ (accessed 18 August 2011).

  • Cawson, P., Watt am, C, Brooker, S. and Kelly, G. (2000). Child maltreatment in the United Kingdom: A study of the prevalence of abuse and neglect. London: NSPCC. Chambers, M. (2011). Transforming offender management, reducing reoffending. ThinkTanks. Available at http://conservativehome.blogs.com/ thinktankcentral/2010/ll/max-chambers-transforming-offender-manage-ment-reducing-reoffending.html (accessed 21 August 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, C. and Williamson, S. (2000). A review of the research literature on serious violent and sexual offenders. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Central Research Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Critcher, C. (2003) Moral Panics and the Media. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, C. and Albertson, K. (2011). Payment by results and social impact bonds in the criminal justice sector: New challenges for the concept of evidence-based policy? Criminology and Criminal Justice, 11(5), 395–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, B. (2009). Child sexual abuse: Informed or in fear? Criminal Justice Matters, 77(1), 6–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garland, D. (2001) The Culture of Crime Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer, C. (2003/2012). Sex aime and the media: Sex offending and the press in a divided society. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubin, D. (1998). Sex offending against children: Understanding the risk. Police Research Paper 99. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Health Development Agency (2004). The effectiveness of public health campaigns. HDA briefing No. 7, Consumers and Markets. London: Health Development Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebenton, B. and Thomas, T. (1996). Tracking sex offenders. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 35(2), 97–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hebert, N. (2011). Restorative justice, policing and the big society. 25 February. Available at http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/media-centre/speeches/Herbert-Restorative-Justice (accessed 18 August 2011).

  • HMIP (Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Probation) and HJMIC (Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary) (2005). Managing sex offenders in the community: A joint inspection on sex offenders. London: HMIP and HMIC. Available at http://www.hmcpsi.gov.uk/documents/reports/CJJI_THM/OFFM/jin_20051201.pdf (accessed 25 September 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • HMIP and HMIC (2010). Restriction and rehabilitation: Getting the right Mix: An inspection of the management of sexual offenders in the community. A joint inspection by HMI Probation and HMI Constabulary. London: Criminal Justice Joint Inspection. Available at http://www.justice.gov.uk/downloads/publi-cations/inspectorate-reports /hmipr obati on / j oint-themati c/S ex_Offender s_ Report-rps.pdf (accessed 25 September 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office (2012). Guidance on Part Two of the Sexual Offences Act 2003. Available at https://www.gov.uk/govemment/uploads/system/uploads/attach-ment_data/file/117551 /sexual-offences-act-2003.pdf (accessed 25 September 2013).

  • Home Office (2012).Reviewing offenders subject to indefinite notification requirementsÇPart 2 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003)-impact assessmemt http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/publications/about-us/legisiation/sexual-of-fences-remedial-order/ (accessed 25 September 2013).

  • Human Rights Watch (2013). Raised on the Registry: the irreparable harm of placing children on sex offender registries in the US. USA: Human Rights Watch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemshall, H. (2003). Understanding risk in criminal justice. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemshall, H. (2008). Understanding the community management of high-risk offenders. Maidenhead: McGraw Hill/Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemshall, H. (2012). Public sector and voluntary sector responses: Dealing with sex offenders. In J. Brown and S. Walklate (eds). Handbook on Sexual Violence (pp. 436–458). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemshall, H. and Wood, J. (2009). Community strategies for managing high-risk offenders: The contribution of multi-agency public protection arrangements. In A. Beech, L. Craig and K. Browne (eds). Assessment and treatment of sex offenders: A handbook. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemshall, H, Mackenzie, G., Wilkinson, B. and Miller, J. (2006). Risk of harm guidance and training resources. [CD-ROM]. National Offender Management Service, Leicester: De Montfort University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemshall, H, McCartan, K. F. and Hudson, K. (2013). International approaches to understanding and responding to sexual abuse. ATSA Forum, XXV(2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitzinger, J. (1999). The ultimate neighbour from hell? Stranger danger and the media representation of paedophilia. In B. Franklin (ed.) Social policy, the media and misrepresentation (pp. 207–221). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitzinger, J. (2004). Framing abuse: Media influence and public understanding of sexual violence against children. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleban, H. and Jeglic, E. (2012). Dispelling the myths: Can psychoeducation change public attitudes towards sex offenders? journal of Sexual Aggression, 18(2), 178–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loader, I., & Sparks, R. (2010). Public Criminology? London: Routeledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, M., Kemshall, H., Noaks, L. and Wincup, E. (2001). Risk management of sexual and violent offenders: The work of public protection panels. Police Research Series 139. London: Home Office. Available at http://library.npia.police.uk/ docs/hopolicers/prs 139.pdf (accessed 25 September 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathiesen, T. (1997). The viewer society: Michel Foucault’s ‘Panopticon’ revisted. Theoretical Criminology, 45(3), 373–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matravers, A. (2003). Setting some boundaries: Rethinking responses to sex offenders. In A. Matravers (ed.) Sex offenders in the community: Managing and reducing the risks (pp. 1–28). Cullompton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAlinden, A. (2010). Restorative justice and the reintegration of high-risk sex offenders. In K. Harrison (ed.) Managing high-risk sex offenders in the community: Risk management, treatment and social responsibility. Cullompton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCartan, K., Kemshall, H., Westwood, S., Solle, J.,Cattell, J., MacKenize, G. and Pollard, A. (2014) Circles of Support and Accountability (CoSA): A case file review of two pilots. Project Report. Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCartan, K. R (2004). ‘HERE THERE BE MONSTERS’: The public’s perception of paedophiles with particular reference to Belfast and Leicester. Medicine, Science and the Law, 44, 327–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCartan, K. F. (2010). Student/trainee-professional implicit theories of paedophilia. Psychology, Crime & Law, 16, 265–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCartan, K. F. (2011). Professionals’ contemporary theories and understandings of paedophilia. International Journal of Police Science and Management, 13(4), 322–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCartan, K. F. (2012a). Professionals’ understanding of government strategies for the management of child sexual abusers. Probation Journal, 56, 124–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCartan, K. F. (2012b). The management of sexual offenders in the community: Austerity, engagement, interaction and the ‘big society’. Prison Service Journal, 201,39–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCartan, K. F. (2013a). From a lack of engagement and mistrust to partnership? Public attitudes to the disclosure of sex offender information. International Journal of Police Science and Management, 13(3), 219–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCartan, K. F. (2013b). Public and practitioner attitudes towards the disclosure of sex offender information scheme Minnesota: Preliminary findings from a small-scale qualitative study. Unpublished report for the Robina Institute, University of Minnesota Law School.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCartan, K. F., Hudson, K. and Kemshall, H. (2012). Public understandings of sexual abuse and sexual abusers.,4rS,4 Forum, XXIV(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • McCartan, K. and Mckenzie, N. (2014) Restorative justice, community action and public protection. In S. Maile and D. Griffiths (eds) Public Engagement and Social Science, 1st. Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 127–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQuail, D. (2005). Mass Communication Theory, 5th Edition. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice (2012). Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements Annual Report 2011/12. Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ multi-agency-public-protection-anangements-annual-report (accessed 23 September 2013).

  • Ministry of Justice (2013 a). An overview of sexual offending in England and Wales. London: Ministry of Justice. Available at https://www.gov.uk/govern-ment/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/214970/sexual-offend-ing-overview-jan-2013.pdf (accessed 23 September 2013).

  • Ministry of Justice (2013b). Transforming rehabilitation. Briefing note. Available at http://www.justice.gov.uk/transforming-rehabilitation (accessed 19 November 2013).

  • Ministry of Justice (2012). Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements. Available at http://www. justice.gov.uk/offenders/multi-agency-public-protection-arrange-ments (accessed 19 November 2013).

  • Ministry of Justice/National Offender Management Service (2010). Position statement for the assessment, management and treatment of sex offenders. London: Ministry of Justice. Available at http://hlsweb.dmu.ac.uk/pgcpd/roh436/offi-cial-documents/NOMS%20Sex%20Offender%20Position%20Statement%20 FinalSept2010v2.pdf (accessed 23 September 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Minstry of Justice (2010). Draft Structural Reform Plan. London: HM Government, TSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mythen, G., Walklate, S. and Kemshall, H. (2013). Decentralizing risk: The role of the voluntary and community sector in the management of offenders. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 13(4), 363–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash, M. (2006). Public protection and the criminal justice process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, J. (2008) Accountability for Welfare. In Alcock, P., May M., & Rowlingson, K. (eds) The students companion to social policy, 3rd edition. Australia; Blackwell publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • NPS (National Probation Service) (2005) Learning Points from Serious Further Offence Full Reviews. London: NOMS/NPS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office for National Statistics (2013). Crime in England and Wales 2012/2013: Findings from the British crime survey and police recorded aime. London: Office for National Statistics. Available at www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/crime-stats/crime.../ rft—appendix-tables.xls (accessed June 24 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of the Child Commissioner for England (2013). ‘Its wrong... but you get used to if: A qualitative study of gang-associated sexual violence towards, and exploitation of, young people in England’. London: Office of the Child Commissioner for England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, M. (2011). Patterns of reconviction among offenders eligible for multi-agency public protection arrangements (MAPPA). London: Ministry of Justice. Available at https://www.gov.uk/governm ent /uplo ads /syst em/uplo ads /attachment_dat a/ file/2173 73/patterns-reconviction-mappa.pdf (accessed 19 November 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrunik, M. (2002). Managing unacceptable risk: Sex offenders, community response and social policy in the United States and Canada. International journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 46(4), 483–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shute, S. (2004). The Sexual Offences Act 2003 (4) New civil prevention orders: sexual offences prevention orders; foreign travel orders; risk of sexual harm orders. Criminal Law Review, 417–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, J. and Wilson, D. (2002). Innocence betrayed: Paedophilia, the media and society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soothill, K. (2003). Serious sexual assault: Using history and statistics. In A. Matravers (ed.) Sex offenders in the community: Managing and reducing the risk. Cullompton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smallbone, S., Marshall, W. L. and Wortley R. (2008). Preventing child sexual abuse: Evidence, policy and practice. Cullompton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, J. and Klein, A. (2011). A reasoned approach.Oiegon, USA: ATSA. Available at http://www.atsa.com/pdfs/ppReasonedApproach.pdf (June 24th 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, T. (2005) Sex Crime: Sex Offending and Society. Cullompton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, T. (2011). The registration and monitoring of sex offenders: A comparative study. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, T. (2013). Sex crime: Sex offending and society (2nd ed., revised). Cullompton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilczynski, A. and Sinclair, K. (1999). Moral tales: Representations of child abuse in the quality and tabloid media. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 32(3), 262–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R., Pichea, J. and Pinzo, M. (2007). Evaluating the effectiveness of professionally facilitated volunteerism in the community management of high-risk sexual offenders: Part two — a comparison of recidivism rates. Howard Journal, 46(4), 327–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J., Kemshall, H., Westwood, S., Fenton, A. and Logue, C. (2010).Investigating disclosures made by sexual offenders: Preliminary study for the evaluation of mandatory polygraph testing. Research Summary 6/10. Available at http://www.justice.gov.uk/downloads/publications/research-and-analysis/moj-research/investi-gating-disclosures-sexual-offenders.pdf (accessed 23 September 2013).

  • Wood, J., Kemshall, H., with Maguire, M., Hudson, K. and MacKenzie, G. (2007). the op eration an d exp erience of multi-agency puhlicprotection ana ngem en ts (MAPPA). London: Home Office, Research and Statistics Department. Available at http://www.caerdydd.ac.uk/socsi/resources/MAPPA1207.pdf (accessed 26 September 2013).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Hazel Kemshall and Kieran McCartan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kemshall, H., McCartan, K. (2014). Managing Sex Offenders in the UK: Challenges for Policy and Practice. In: McCartan, K. (eds) Responding to Sexual Offending. Palgrave Studies in Risk, Crime and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137358134_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics