Abstract
Marketed as a “peasant poet,” John Clare’s poetic identity is marked by his relationship to the natural world. His poems detail the vanishing topos of his childhood spent on common land; enclosure interrupts his walking paths with fences, cuts down beloved trees, and radically alters the visible landscape. “All my favourite places have met with misfortunes,” Clare laments in his “Autobiographical Fragments” (BH 41). Describing the fate of particular, beloved places altered by enclosure, Clare uses the word “misfortune,” a word that hints at his penchant for anthropomorphism, since “misfortune” is almost always used in connection with human social existence. Clare’s middle period poetry records his native Helpston’s natural and social history through a “language that is ever green,” which has been described by James McKusick as a unique “ecolect” that attempts to conserve what is left of his native Helpston.1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Although often this view was put forth to highlight the threat of liberal rights, such as in Thomas Taylor, A Vindication of the Rights of Brutes (London: Edward Jeffrey, 1792).
Perkins, Romanticism and Animal Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2003).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Katey Castellano
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Castellano, K. (2013). Anthropomorphism and the Critique of Liberal Rights in John Clare’s Enclosure Elegies. In: The Ecology of British Romantic Conservatism, 1790–1837. Palgrave Studies in the Enlightenment, Romanticism and Cultures of Print. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137354204_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137354204_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-46992-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-35420-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)