Thomas Bewick’s A History of British Birds and the Politics of the Miniature

  • Katey Castellano
Part of the Palgrave Studies in the Enlightenment, Romanticism and Cultures of Print book series (PERCP)


Eighteenth century natural history is inextricably linked to colonial expansion, which brought with it a swell of new species to be named, examined, and categorized — a “burgeoning proliferation of colonial natures.”1 As Mary Louise Pratt points out, the cosmopolitan, systematic arrangement of plants and animals led to “a new form of what one might call planetary consciousness among Europeans.” A consequence of this planetary consciousness, Pratt observes, was the way in which “the system of nature overwrote local and peasant ways of knowing within Europe just as it did indigenous ones abroad.”2 While natural history expanded outward to classify all life on the planet, Thomas Bewick’s A History of British Birds (Vol. I, 1797; Vol. II, 1804) aimed to conserve a complex collection of small, miniature details of regional knowledge. Instead of placing animals within a global, Linnaean system that pursued and applied the regularities of laws, Bewick employed and conserved a provincial folk taxonomy, which defined and categorized birds by their “ecological proclivity,” their interrelationships with other animal, human, and plant life.3 By narrating bird behavior and habits within a circumscribed space, Bewick’s British Birds additionally chronicles a “second nature” as the text records social customs and relations within Bewick’s native Northumberland.


Water Bird Title Page Moral Economy Land Bird Folk Taxonomy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Alan Bewell, “Romanticism and Colonial Natural History,” Studies in Romanticism 43.1 (Spring 2004): 30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 16.
    Catherine Gallagher and Stephen Greenblatt, Practicing New Historicism (Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2000), 68.Google Scholar
  3. John Brewer and Stella Tillyard, “The Moral Vision of Thomas Bewick,” in The Transformation of Political Culture: England and Germany in the Late Eighteenth Century, ed. Eckhart Hellmuth (London: The German Historical Institute, 1990), 390.Google Scholar
  4. 38.
    Davide Maltoni et al., Handbook of Fingerprint Recognition (New York: Springer-Verlag, 2009), 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Katey Castellano 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katey Castellano
    • 1
  1. 1.James Madison UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations