Fellowship and Treason

  • Ruth Lexton
Part of the Arthurian and Courtly Cultures book series (SACC)


The final books of the Morte Darthur chart the failure of the Arthurian polity. The disaster tends to be seen as a monarch’s tragic fall, the outcome of Guinevere and Lancelot’s ill-starred affair, or as a result of a descent into feud and factionalism, with Arthur, Lancelot, or Gawain individually or jointly culpable.1 There is, as Mark Lambert says, a “tragic multicentricity” to the last books, no single cause but a conglomera- tion of avoidable disasters.2 In these tales, the contested language of trea- son expresses the various ways in which the polity is thwarted: Lancelot and Guinevere’s treasonous adultery, the slaying of Gaheris and Gareth “traytourly and piteuously” by Lancelot, and the usurpation of “an false traytoure whych ys … sir Mordred” (Works, 1199.8–9; 1231.28–29). As treason multiplies and expands to engulf the Round Table, the language of fellowship reemerges in the service of new ends of partisanship. In this final chapter, I focus on the contested language of treason and fellow- ship as indications of pervasive and externalized constructions of political action that constrain the choices of individuals. The tragedy of the Morte lies not simply in individual flaws or in the forces of fate but in the move- ment of each character within the political structure, expressed in these common terms, that confines them.


Round Table Judicial Process Fellowship Unity Final Book Single Combat 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Larry D. Benson, Malory’s “Morte Darthur” (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1976), 239–40; Raluca L. Radulescu, The Gentry Context for Malory’s “Morte Darthur” Arthurian Studies 55 (Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2003), 138–39; Beverly Kennedy, Knighthood in the “Morte Darthur” Arthurian Studies 11 (Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 1985), 328–30; C. David Benson, “The Ending of the Morte Darthur, ” in A Companion to Malory, Arthurian Studies 37, ed. Elizabeth Archibald and A. S. G. Edwards (Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 1996), 231; Kenneth Hodges, Forging Chivalric Communities in Malory’s “Le Morte Darthur” (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005), 94–99; Elizabeth T. Pochoda, Arthurian Propaganda: “Le Morte Darthur” as an Historical Ideal of Life (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1971), 138. D. S. Brewer, introduction to The Morte Darthur: Parts Seven and Eight, by Sir Thomas Malory, ed. D. S. Brewer (London: Edward Arnold, 1968), 28.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mark Lambert, Malory: Style and Vision in “Le Morte Darthur” (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1975), 168.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Elizabeth Archibald, “Malory’s Ideal of Fellowship,” Review of English Studies 43, no. 171 (1992): 311–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Christopher Cannon, “Malory’s Crime: Chivalric Identity and Evil Will,” in Medieval Literature and Historical Inquiry: Essays in Honor of Derek Pearsall, ed. David Aers (Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2000), 160–62.Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    E. Kay Harris, “Censoring Disobedient Subjects: Narratives of Treason and Royal Authority in Fifteenth-Century England,” in Reputation and Representation in Fifteenth-Century Europe, ed. Douglas L. Biggs, Sharon D. Michalove, and A. Compton Reeves (Leiden, Netherlands: Brill, 2004), 219–20.Google Scholar
  6. 8.
    Michel Foucault, Discipline and Punish, trans. Alan Sheridan, 2nd edn. (New York: Vintage Books, 1995), 25.Google Scholar
  7. 11.
    Quoted in J. G. Bellamy, The Law of Treason in England in the Later Middle Ages (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970), 1; Richard Firth Green, A Crisis of Truth: Literature and Law in Ricardian England (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1999), 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 14.
    J. G. Bellamy, The Criminal Trial in Later Medieval England: Felony before the Courts from Edward I to the Sixteenth Century (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1998), 61; J. G. Bellamy, Crime and Public Order in England in the later Middle Ages (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1973), 30–31. Late medieval English law acknowledged a distinction between pardonable homicide (accidental manslaughter, murder in self-defense and murder in hot blood) and non-pardonable homicide, including killing by ambush, deliberate attack, or malicious intent. The distinction, established by a statute of 1390, however, was not recognized in the courts. Thus there were no graduations in penalties between the different offenses.Google Scholar
  9. 53.
    Burns, Bodytalk, 5–8; Peggy McCracken, The Romance of Adultery: Queenship and Sexual Transgression in Old French Literature (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1998), 31–35.Google Scholar
  10. 54.
    Joan Wallach Scott, Gender and Politics of History, revised edn. (New York: Columbia University Press, 1999), 45.Google Scholar
  11. 56.
    D. Armstrong, Gender and Community, 56, 193–95; Kenneth Hodges, “Guinevere’s Politics in Malory’s Morte Darthur,” Journal of English and Germanic Philology 104, no. 1 (2005): 54–60.Google Scholar
  12. 71.
    Maurice Keen, “Treason Trials under the Law of Arms,” TRHS 5th ser., 12 (1962): 91–101.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Ruth Lexton 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ruth Lexton

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations