Abstract
A constant theme in the history of Christianity has been the struggle between those who rely on divine inspiration to define the faith and those who argue that truth should be established by the institutional church. The chapter of the broader story that this book explores features the tension that shaped the faith and practices of sixteenth- and seventeenth-century puritanism between scripturally aware laymen and laywomen, who believed themselves to be inspired by the Spirit, and university-trained clergy. There was a long prelude to this story. In the earliest days of faith, groups such as the gnostics, who asserted the value of personal, intuitive means to discern truth, were gradually forced to the margins, and their writings excluded from the “canon” of acceptable beliefs.1 By the start of the third century there was a mainstream Catholic church in the west that asserted itself as the single authority able to “choose sacred texts for canonical status or compare the local creeds in Churches for a uniform direction in teaching.”2 The Nicene Creed was a major step in the process of defining orthodoxy, produced at the general council that the emperor Constantine called to meet in the city of Nicaea in 325, and modified at the First Council of Constantinople (381).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
For a discussion of some of these alternative visions of Christianity see Elaine Pagels, The Gnostic Gospels (New York: Random House, 1979).
Diarmaid MacCulloch, A History of Christianity: The First Three Thousand Years (London: Penguin, 2009), 130.
Richard L. Greaves, “The Ordination Controversy and the Spirit of Reform in Puritan England,” Journal of Ecclesiastical History, 21 (1970), 225.
Christopher Hill, Society & Puritanism in Pre-Revolutionary England (New York: Schocken, 1964), 487–8. David D. Hall points out that in his early writings Luther took the position that “the whole body of the faithful were priests: all who were believers could offer the ‘spiritual’ sacrifice of faith,” but that by the 1530s he had retreated from this position as he came to see a greater need for order.
David D. Hall, The Faithful Shepherd: A History of the New England Ministry in the Seventeenth Century (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1972), 7–8.
Geoffrey F. Nuttall, The Holy Spirit in Puritan Faith and Experience, with a new introduction by Peter Lake (University of Chicago Press, 1992), 22.
Francis J. Bremer, Building a New Jerusalem: John Davenport, a Puritan in Three Worlds (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2012), 185–7.
Patrick Collinson, “Sects and the Evolution of Puritanism,” in Collinson, From Cranmer to Sandcroft (London: Hambledon, 2006), 131.
Stephen Brachlow, The Communion of the Saints: Radical Puritan and Separatist Ecclesiology, 1570–1625 (Oxford University Press, 1988), 3. Some of these issues are discussed in
Marilyn J. Westerkamp, “Puritan Patriarchy and the Problem of Revelation,” Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 23 (1993), 571–95.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Francis J. Bremer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bremer, F.J. (2015). The Experience and Meaning of God’s Caress. In: Lay Empowerment and the Development of Puritanism. Christianities in the Trans-Atlantic World, 1500–1800. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137352897_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137352897_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-67497-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-35289-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)