Advertisement

The Autonomy of Organised Civil Society in Strategic Policy Decision-Making: A Resource-Dependence Perspective

  • Joris De Corte
  • Bram Verschuere
Chapter
Part of the IIAS Series: Governance and Public Management book series (GPM)

Abstract

In contemporary welfare states, governments increasingly rely on private actors for delivering public welfare services to citizens (Snavely & Desai, 2001; Salamon, Sokolowski et al., 2004; Anheier, 2005).1 Due to their grass-roots bottom-up nature and rather small scale of operation, non-profit organisations (NPOs) have become appealing partners for public policymakers who wish to involve the organised civil society in the policy process. The argument is that NPOs, by their nature of being exponents of organised civil society, have greater opportunities for tailoring services to clients’ needs and are better able to influence local social behaviour as well (Salamon, 1995; Boris & Steuerle, 1999). For governments that engage with the organised civil society, the key challenge then becomes one of ensuring that NPOs remain publicly accountable for the deployment of sometimes very substantial public funds. Still, this may not reap some of the indisputable benefits attributed to NPOs’ activities that to a large extent derive from their flexibility and autonomy of not just being another arm of government (Huxham, 1995; Boyle & Butler, 2003). This chapter approaches the above issues of NPOs’ accountability and autonomy from the perspective of NPOs involved in publicly funded welfare programs. A large of amount of scholarship has already focused on the impact of governmental interference on the NPOs’ functioning and autonomy, but this discussion remains far from being settled (Toepler, 2010)

Keywords

Civil Society Strategic Decision Organise Civil Society Nonprofit Sector Organisational Capacity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anheier, H. K., Toepler, S., et al. (1997) ‘The Implications of Government Funding for Non-profit Organizations: Three Propositions’, International Journal of Public Sector Management 10(3): 190–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anheier, L. (2005) The Nonprofit Sector: Approaches, Management, Policy (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
  3. Brandsen, T., Trommel, W., Verschuere, B. (2012) A European Spring? Addressing the Public Discontent in Society. Policy Brief (published at: http://www.wilcoproject.eu).Google Scholar
  4. Boris, E., C. Steuerle (1999) Nonprofits and Government: Collaboration and Conflict (Washington, DC: Urban Institute).Google Scholar
  5. Boyle, R., M. Butler (2003) Autonomy versus Accountability: Managing Government Funding of Voluntary and Community Organizations (Dublin: The Institute of Public Administration).Google Scholar
  6. Candler, G., Dumont, G. (2010) ‘A Non-profit Accountability Framework’, Canadian Public Administration 53(3).Google Scholar
  7. Chavez, M., L. Stephens, et al. (2004) ‘Does Government Funding Suppress Nonprofit’s Political Activity?’ American Sociological Review 69(2).Google Scholar
  8. Child, C. D., K. A. Gronbjerg (2007) ‘Nonprofit Advocacy Organizations: Their Characteristics and Activities’, Social Science Quarterly 88(1): 259–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Christensen, R., A. Ebrahim (2006) ‘How Does Accountability Affect Mission? The Case of a Nonprofit Serving Immigrants and Refugees’, Nonprofit Management and Leadership 17(2).Google Scholar
  10. Elbers, W., L. Schulpen (2011) ‘Decision Making in Partnerships for Development: Explaining the Influence of Local Partners’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 40(5): 795–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Froelich, K. A. (1999) ‘Diversification of Revenue Strategies: Evolving Resource Dependence in Nonprofit Organizations’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 28(3): 246–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gazley, B. (2010) ‘Why Not Partner with Local Government? Nonprofit Managerial Perceptions of Collaborative Disadvantage’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 39(1): 51–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gjems-Onstad, O. (1990) ‘The Independence of Voluntary Organizations in a Social Democracy: Governmental Influences in Norway’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 19(4), 393–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gronbjerg, K. (1991) ‘Managing Grants and Contracts: The Case of Four Nonprofit Social Service Organizations’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 20, 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gronbjerg, K. (1993) Understanding Nonprofit Funding: Managing Revenues in Social Service and Community Development Organizations (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass).Google Scholar
  16. Huxham, C. (1995) ‘Pursuing Collaborative Advantage’, Journal of the Operational Research Survey 44(6): 599–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jung, K., M. J. Moon (2007) ‘The Double-edged Sword of Public-resource Dependence: The Impact of Public Resources on Autonomy and Legitimacy in Korean Cultural Nonprofit Organizations’, Policy Studies Journal 35(2): 205–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kearns, L. (1996) Managing for Accountability: Preserving the Public Trust in Public and Nonprofit Organizations (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass).Google Scholar
  19. Kirk, S., Kutchins, H. (1992) Diagnosis and Uncertainty in Mental Health Organizations, in Y. Hasenfeld (ed.), Human Services as Complex Organizations (Newbury Park, CA: Sage).Google Scholar
  20. Lipskey, M., Smith, S. (1990) ‘Nonprofit Organizations, Government and the Welfare State’, Political Science Quarterly 104, 625–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McCarthy, J., Zald, M. (1977) ‘Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory’, American Journal of Sociology 82(6), 1212–1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Never, B. (2011) ‘Understanding Constraints on Nonprofit Leadership Tactics in Times of Recession’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 40(6), 990–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nicholson-Crotty, J. (2007) ‘Politics, Policy, and the Motivations for Advocacy in Nonprofit Reproductive Health and Family Planning Providers’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 36(1), 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nikolic, S., Koontz, T. (2007) ‘Nonprofit Organizations in Environmental Management: A Comparative Analysis of Government Impacts’. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18, 441–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pfeffer, J., Salancik, G. (2003) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective, 2nd ed. (Stanford: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
  26. Salamon, L. M. (1987) ‘Of Market Failure, Voluntary Failure and 3rd-party Government: Toward a Theory of Government-Nonprofit Relations in the Modern Welfare State’, Journal of Voluntary Action Research 16(1–2), 29–49.Google Scholar
  27. Salamon, L. (1995) Partners in Public Service: Government-nonprofit Relations in the Modern Welfare State (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar
  28. Salamon, L., Anheier, H. (1998) ‘Social Origins of Civil Society: Explaining the Nonprofit Sector Cross-nationally’, Voluntas 9(3): 213–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Salamon, L., Anheier, H. (1999) Global Civil Society: Dimensions of the Nonprofit Sector (Manchester: Manchester University Press).Google Scholar
  30. Salamon, L., Sokolowski, A., & Associates (2004) Global Civil Society: Dimensions of the Nonprofit Sector (Bloomfield, IN: Kumarian Press).Google Scholar
  31. Schmid, H., Bar, M., Nirel, R. (2008) ‘Advocacy Activities in Nonprofit Human Service Organizations’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 37(4), 581–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Smith, L., Lipsky, M. (1993) Nonprofits for Hire: The Welfare State in the Age of Contracting (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  33. Snavely, K., Desai, U. (2001) ‘Mapping Local Government-Nongovernmental Organization Interactions: A Conceptual Framework’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 11(2), 245–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stainton, T. (1994) Autonomy and Social Policy: Rights, Mental Handicap and Community Care (Aldershot, UK: Avebury).Google Scholar
  35. Stone, M. M. (1989) ‘Planning as Strategy in Nonprofit Organizations: An Exploratory Study’ Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 18, 297–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stone, M. M., Bigelow, B., Crittenden, W. (1999) ‘Research on Strategic Management in Nonprofit Organizations: Synthesis, Analysis, and Future Directions’ Administration & Society, 31(3), 378–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Toepler, S. (2010) ‘Government Funding Policies’, in B. Seaman & D. R. Young (eds), Handbook of Research on Nonprofit Economics and Management (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar).Google Scholar
  38. Verbruggen, S., Christiaens, J., Milis, K. (2011) ‘Can Resource Dependence and Coercive Isomorphism Explain Nonprofit Organizations’ Compliance with Reporting Standards?’ Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 40(1), 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Verhoest, K., Roness, P. G., Verschuere, B., Rubecksen, K., Muiris MacCarthaig, K. (2010) Autonomy and Control of State Agencies: Comparing States and Agencies (New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wolch, J. (1990) Planning as Crisis Management: An Analysis of London’s Voluntary Sector (New Haven, CT: Yale Program on Non-Profit Organizations).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Joris De Corte and Bram Verschuere 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joris De Corte
  • Bram Verschuere

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations