Skip to main content

Of the Many Who Returned and Yet Were Dead

  • Chapter
The Philosophy of War and Exile

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Ethics and Public Policy ((PASEPP))

  • 107 Accesses

Abstract

To talk today of combatant suffering is to talk of PTSD. Since its inclu sion in the third edition of the American Psychiatric Association’s The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (or DSM-III) in 1980 — an acceptance based on the recognition that the suffering of veterans returning from the Vietnam War was more than just a political tool for pacifistic psychoanalysts protesting the war1 — PTSD has afforded prac titioners, patients, and the public a way of universalizing, and a way of understanding, the effects of going to war. To return from war changed, to be unable to take back up once familiar routines and once close rela tionships was now to be seen as symptomatic of combat rather than as a personal failing or a sign of individual weakness. The ability to identify and classify symptoms then both opened the way for combatants and veterans to avoid the stigma of suffering in war, and further allowed for the diagnosis, treatment, and curing of this suffering.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See Rachel M. MacNair, Perpetration-Induced Traumatic Stress: The Psychological Consequences of Killing (New York: Authors Choice Press, 2002), pp. 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  2. U. S. Department of Veterans Affairs, “DSM-5 Criteria for PTSD,” PTSD: National Center for PTSD, November 4, 2013, http://www.ptsd.va.gov/professional/pages/dsm5_criteria_ptsd.asp.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tom L. Beauchamp and James F. Childress, Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 6th ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008), p. 352.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Michael Walzer, Obligations: Essays on Disobedience, War, and Citizenship (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1970), p. 98.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Michael Walzer, “Political Action: The Problem of Dirty Hands,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 2, no. 2 (1973), p. 160.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Glenn Gray, “Homelessness and Anxiety: Sources of the Modern Mode of Being,” Virginia Quarterly Review, 48, no. 1 (Winter 1972), p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Donna Miles, “Survey Shows Growing Gap Between Civilians, Military,” American Forces Press Service, November 28, 2011, http://www.defense.gov/News/NewsArticle.aspx?ID=66253.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Patrick Lin, “Ethical Blowback from Emerging Technologies,” Journal of Military Ethics, 9, no. 4 (2010), pp. 331–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Nolen Gertz

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gertz, N. (2014). Of the Many Who Returned and Yet Were Dead. In: The Philosophy of War and Exile. Palgrave Studies in Ethics and Public Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137351227_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics