Abstract
On 21 November 1945, six months after the end of the Second World War, 21 former high-ranking members of the Nazi state entered Courtroom 600 in the Nuremberg Palace of Justice to face charges of conspiracy, crimes against peace, war crimes and crimes against humanity.1 The subsequent proceedings before the four Allied powers lasted for almost a year, fill over 20 volumes and have become known as one of the most famous courtroom dramas in history. The legacy of the International Military Tribunal (IMT) is multifaceted; aside from its significance in terms of the development of international criminal law and, in particular, the concept of ‘crimes against humanity’, the trial was also responsible for the preservation and translation of a wealth of primary source material from the Third Reich which remains an important tool for historical research. In popular culture too, the IMT — and the subsequent Nuremberg proceedings — has left its mark, including the 1961 film Judgment at Nuremberg and the 2000 production Nuremberg. Furthermore, the courtroom itself has become something of a tourist attraction, receiving 13,138 visitors in 2005 alone. It now houses a permanent exhibition on the tribunal.2
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See, for example: George Ginsburgs, The Nuremberg Trial and International Law (Dordrecht, 1990); John and Ann Tusa, The Nuremberg Trial (London, 1983); Bradley F. Smith, Reaching Judgement at Nuremberg (London, 1977); Robert K. Woetzel, The Nuremberg Trials in International Law (London, 1962); Robert Wolfe, ‘Flaws in the Nuremberg Legacy: An Impediment to International War Crimes Tribunals’ Prosecution of Crimes against Humanity’, Holocaust and Genocide Studies, 12(3) (1998), 434–453.
See, for example: Richard Overy, Interrogations: Inside the Minds of the Nazi Elite (London, 2002); Hannah Caven, ‘Horror in our Time: Images of the Concentration Camps in the British Media, 1945’, Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television, 21(3) (2001), 205–253
Susan Twist, ‘Evidence of Atrocities or Atrocious Use of Evidence: The Controversial Use of Atrocity Film at Nuremberg’, Liverpool Law Review, 26(3) (2005), 267–302
Lawrence Douglas, ‘Film as Witness: Screening Nazi Concentration Camps before the Nuremberg Tribunal’, The Yale Law Journal, 105(2) (1995), 449–481.
Michael Marrus, ‘The Holocaust at Nuremberg’, Yad Vashem Studies, 26 (1998), 5–41
Erich Haberer, ‘History and Justice: Paradigms of the Prosecution of Nazi Crimes’, Holocaust and Genocide Studies, 19(3) (2005), 487–519
John Fox, ‘The Jewish Factor in British War Crimes Policy in 1942’, English Historical Review, 92(362) (1977), 82–106.
Donald Bloxham, ‘British War Crimes Trial Policy in Germany, 1945–1957: Implementation and Collapse’, journal of British Studies, 42 (2003), 91–118.
For narratives of German responses to the IMT, see: Wilbourn E. Benton, Nuremberg: German Views of the War Trials (Dallas, 1955); Christoph Burchard, ‘The Nuremberg Trial and its Impact on Germany’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 4 (2006), 800–829.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Caroline Sharples
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sharples, C. (2013). Holocaust on Trial: Mass Observation and British Media Responses to the Nuremberg Tribunal, 1945–1946. In: Sharples, C., Jensen, O. (eds) Britain and the Holocaust. The Holocaust and its Contexts. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137350770_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137350770_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-46856-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-35077-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)