Skip to main content

Reflecting on Political Performance: Introducing Critical Perspectives

  • Chapter
Anthropology, Theatre, and Development

Part of the book series: Anthropology, Change and Development ((ACD))

Abstract

Rural Santa Catarina in sub-tropical South Brazil, and Mülheim, a pleasant German city in the post-industrial Ruhr valley. As editors, our field sites are strikingly different and hard to imagine side by side. In Brazil, you arrive along a dusty track to huge concrete gymnasia where state meetings of Latin America’s largest social movement, the Landless Workers’ Movement (MST) take place. Cows stand idly in pens in adjacent fields. Coaches that have transported hundreds of people to the meeting line up in parking lots nearby. Sentries bar the gates and word of mouth communication from a leader is required before they allow you to pass. A brief exchange and they either swing open the broad wooden gates or they turn you back. Once beyond the perimeter, in this rural location outside a small town in the Brazilian interior, the meeting itself is abuzz with energy, people going hither and thither, camping down on a concrete floor in a mixture of tents, old mattresses, and dusty blankets. The meeting will last four days and there is excitement and anticipation about the programme, of which a key part will be the dramatic performances, the mística. Images line the main hall. Sebastião Salgado’s series on the Landless Workers’ Movement has pride of place, hasty photocopies of his work strung out down the full length of one wall.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Abu-Lughod, L. 1990. ‘The Romance of Resistance: Tracing Transformations of Power through Bedouin Women’. American Ethnologist. 17: 41–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, J. C. 2011. Performance and Power. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1970. ‘Performative Utterances’. In Austin, J. L. (ed.). Philosophical Papers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 233–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baert, P. 1998. Social Theory in the 20th Century. Cambridge/New York: Polity Press & New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, K. 2007. The Anthropology of Texts, Persons and Publics: Oral and Written Culture in Africa and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barmeyer, N. 2003. ‘The Guerrilla Movement as a Project: An Assessment of Community Involvement in the EZLN’. Latin American Perspectives. 30: 122–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, A. 2001. Political Machines: Governing a Technological Society. London and New York: Athlone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, W. 1978 [1955]. Critique of Violence, in: Reflections: Essays, Aphorisms, Autobiographical Writings. New York: Schocken.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, C. 2004. Antagonism and Relational Aesthetics1T October 110: 51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boal, A. 2000. Theater of the Oppressed, London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boon, R. and J. Plastow (eds). 1998. Theatre Matters. Performance and Culture on the World Stage: Cambridge Studies in Modern Theatre. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (eds). 2004. Theatre as Empowerment: Community Drama on the World Stage. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borland, E. 2006. The Mature Resistance of Argentina’s Madres de Plaza de Mayo. In: Johnston, H. and Almeida, P. (eds). Latin American Social Movements: Globalization, Democratization and Transnational Networks. London: Routledge, 115–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourriaud, N. 2002. Relational Aesthetics. Dijon: Les Presses du réel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breed, A. 2014. Performing the Nation: Genocide, Justice, Reconciliation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2002. Playback in Theatre for Development: Centre for Playback Theatre. Available online at: http://www.playbacktheatre.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Breed-Playback-In-Theatre-For-Development.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1993. Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1997. Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2013. Dispossession: The Performative in the Political. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byam, D. 1999. Community in Motion: Theatre for Development in Africa. London: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Cruz, J. 2010. Engaging Performance: Theatre as Call and Response. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, S. J. and A. Ong. 2005. Global Assemblages, Athropological Problems. In Ong, A. and Collier, S. J. (eds). Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, B. and U. Kothari. 2001. Participation: The New Tyranny? London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crehan, K. 2012. Community Art: An Anthropological Perspective. Basingstoke: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, T. C. and T. Postlewait. (eds). 2003. Theatricality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deck, J. and A. Sieburg (eds). 2011. Politisch Theater Machen: Neue Artikulationsformen des Politischen in den darstellenden Künsten. Bielefeld: Transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duttlinger, C., L. Ruprecht, and A. Webber. 2003. Performance and Performativity in German Cultural Studies, German Linguistic and Cultural Studies 14. Oxford: Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Englund, H. 2011. Human Rights and African Airwaves: Mediating Equality on the Chichewa Radio. Bloomington/Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2006. Prisoners of Freedom: Human Rights and the African Poor. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar, A. 2004. ‘Beyond the Third World: Imperial Globality, Global Coloniality and Anti-Globalisation Social Movements’. Third World Quarterly. 25(1): 207–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faubion, J. 2011. An Anthropology of Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, J. 2006. Of Mimicry and Membership: Africans and the ‘New Membership Society’. In: Global Shadows: Africa in the Neoliberal World Order. Durham/London: Duke University Press, pp. 155–175.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, M. M. J. 2003. Emergent Forms of Life and the Anthropological Voice. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer-Lichte, E. 2004. Ästhetik des Performativen. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2012. Performativität: Eine Einführung. Bielefeld: Transcript.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. 1973. Education for Critical Consciousness. New York: Continuum Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1975. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. London: Penguin Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geuss, R. 1981. The Idea of a Critical Theory: Habermas and the Frankfurt School. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2008. Philosophy and Real Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1976. Gender Display and Gender Commercials: Gender Advertisements. New York: Harper and Row.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Green, M. 2000. ‘Participatory Development and the Appropriation of Agency in Southern Tanzania’. Critique of Anthropology. 20: 67–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. 1971. Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science and Politics. London: Heinemann Educational.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemke, R. (ed.). 2010. Theatre in Sub-Saharan Africa. Volume 77, Recherchen. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschkind, C. 2006. The Ethical Soundscape: Cassette Sermons and Islamic Counterpublics. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kampwirth, K. 1996, ‘Creating Space in Chiapas: An Analysis of the Strategies of the Zapatista Army and the Rebel Government in Transition’. Bulletin of Latin American Research. 15: 261–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korom, F. J. (ed.). 2013. The Anthropology of Performance: A Reader. Malden/Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laidlaw, J. 2002. ‘For an Anthropology of Ethics and Freedom’. JRAI. 8: 311–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2014. The Subject of Virtue: An Anthropology of Ethics and Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambek, M. 2000a. ‘Nuriaty, the Saint and the Sultan: Virtuous Subject and Subjective Virtuoso of the Post-Modern Colony’. Anthropology Today. 16(2): 7–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 2000b. ‘The Anthropology of Religion and the Quarrel between Poetry and Philosophy’. Current Anthropology. 41: 309–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. (ed.). 2010a. Ordinary Ethics: Anthropology, Language, and Action. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2010b. Towards an Ethics of the Act. In: Ordinary Ethics. Anthropology, Language, and Action. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. 2004. Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, N. and H. Moore. 2012. ‘Sociality Revisited: Setting a New Agenda’. Cambridge Anthropology. 30(1): 40–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, N. J. 2013. Being Malay in Indonesia: Histories, Hopes and Citizenship in the Riau Archipelago. Singapore: NUS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood, S. 2001. ‘Feminist Theory, Embodiment and the Docile Agent: Some Reflections on the Egyptian Islamic Revival’. Cultural Anthropology. (16)2: 202–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mda, Z. 1993. When People Play People: Development Communication Through Theatre. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mlama, P. 1991. Culture and Development: The Popular Theatre Approach in Africa. Uppsala: Nordiska Afrikainstitutet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, A. 2003. Acts of Resistance: The Performance of Women’s Grassroots Protest in Peru. Social Movement Studies. 2: 177–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. 1993. The Return of the Political. London/New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1999. ‘Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism’. Social Research. 66(3): 745–758.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2008. Art as an Agonistic Intervention in Public Space. In: Art as a Public Issue: How Art and Its Institutions Reinvent the Public Dimension. Open (14). Rotterdam/Amsterdam: NAi Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2013. Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically. London/New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, H. 2009. Intergenerational Reminiscence Theatre. In Prendergast, M. and Saxton, J. (eds). Applied Theatre: International Case Studies and Challenges for Practice. Bristol: Intellect, pp. 174–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osofisan, F. 1999. ‘Theater and the Rites of “Post-Negritude” Remembering’. Research in African literatures. 30: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oster, M., Waltraud Ernst, and Marion Gerards (eds). 2010. Perfonnativität und Performance: Geschlecht in Musik, Theater und MedienKunst. Muenster: LIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paget, D. 2010. ‘Acts of Commitment: Activist Arts, the Rehearsed Reading, and Documentary Theatre’. New Theatre Quarterly. 26(2): 173–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson Royce, A. 2004. Anthropology of the Performing Arts: Artistry, Virtuosity, and Interpretation in Cross-cultural perspective. Lanham/Oxford: AltaMira.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plessner, H. 1982. ‘Zur Anthropologie des Schauspielers’, in Mit Anderen Augen: Aspekte einer Philosophischen Anthropologie. Berlin: Suhrkamp, pp. 146–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridout, N. 2009. Theatre and Ethics. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. 1989. Contingency, Irony and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. 2007. The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sax, W. S. 2002. Dancing the Self: Personhood and Performance among the Pandav Lila of Garhwal. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedgwick, E. K. 2003. Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srampickal, J. 1994. Voice to the Voiceless: The Power of People’s Theatre in India. New Delhi: Manohar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strathern, M. 1996. ‘Cutting the Network’. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 2 (3): 517–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart Fisher, A. 2011. ‘“That’s Who I’d Be, If I Could Sing”: Reflections on a Verbatim Project with Mothers of Sexually Abused Children’. Studies in Theatre and Performance. 31(2): 193–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinius, J. 2013. ‘Changing the Wheel: Bertolt Brecht’s Stories from the Revolution’. King’s Review. 19 March 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirth, U. (ed.). 2002. Performanz: Zwischen Sprachphilosophie und Kulturwissenschaften. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Alex Flynn and Jonas Tinius

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Flynn, A., Tinius, J. (2015). Reflecting on Political Performance: Introducing Critical Perspectives. In: Flynn, A., Tinius, J. (eds) Anthropology, Theatre, and Development. Anthropology, Change and Development. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137350602_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics