Skip to main content

Abstract

This volume aims to contribute to the study of regulatory governance, today a growing area of research in public policy and public administration. The study of regulatory governance analyses the politics of regulation in the context of globalization, in which different levels are often entrenched in policy processes while multiple actors, public and private, play an increasing role in decision-making, thus having an impact on regulatory outcomes. The various chapters in this volume address a key issue in this area: the challenges of political accountability for the actors and institutions involved in regulatory governance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Akpannuko, E. E. and Asogwa, I. E. (2011) Accountability: A Synthesis. International Journal of Finance and Accounting, 2, 164–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R. and Cave, M. (1999) ‘Franchising and its Limitations’ in R. Baldwin and M. Cave (eds.) Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy and Practice (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 257–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R., Scott, C. and Hood, C. (eds.) (1998) A Reader on Regulation (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bevir, M. (2010) ‘Accountability’ in M. Bevir (ed.) Encyclopedia of Political Theory (Los Angeles: SAGE Publications), vol. 1, pp. 4–6.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bouckaert, G. and Peters, B. G. (2004) ‘What is Available and What is Missing in the Study of Quangos?’ in C. Pollitt and C. Talbot (eds.) Unbundled Government. A critical analysis of the global trend to agencies, quangos and contractualisation (London: Routledge), pp. 22–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouckaert, G., Peters, B. G. and Verhoest, K. (eds.) (2010) The Coordination of Public Sector Organizations: Shifting Patterns of Public Management (London, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bovens, M. (2005) ‘Public Accountability’ in E. Ferlie, L. E. Lynne and C. Pollitt (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Public Management (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp.182–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovens, M. (2007) Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework. European Law Journal, 13, 447–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovens, M., Hart, P. T. and Schillemans, T. (2008) Does Public Accountability Work? An Assessment Tool. Public Administration, 86, 225–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J. (2008) Regulatory Capitalism: How it Works, Ideas for Making it Work Better (Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brandsma, G. J. and Schillemans, T. (2013) The Acountability Cube: Measuring Accountability. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23, 953–975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coen, D. (2005) Business-Regulatory Relations: Learning to Play Regulatory Games in European Utility Markets. Governance. An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions, 18, 375–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Considine, M. and Afzal, K. A. (2012) ‘Accountability in an Age of Markets and Network’ in B. G. Peters and J. Pierre (eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Public Administration (Los Angeles, London: SAGE Publications), pp. 712–730.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, T. and Læeid, P. (2004) The fragmented state-the challenges of combining efficiency, institutional norms and democracy. Working Paper [Online], 3/2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, T. and Læeid, P. (eds.) (2006) Autonomy and Regulation. Coping with Agencies in the Modern State (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleon, L. (1998) Accountability in a ‘reinvented’ Government. Public Administration, 76, 539–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Döhler, M. (2011) ‘Regulation’ in M. Bevir (ed.) The SAGE Handbook of Governance (London: SAGE), pp. 518–534.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dunleavy, P. and Hood, C. (1994) From Old Public Administration to New Public Management. Public Money & Management, 14, 9–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, D. and O’Halloran, S. (1999) Delegating Powers: A Transaction Cost Politics Approach to Policy Making Under Separate Powers (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, P. K. and Ross, K. (1999) Citizen’s Charters and Public Service Provision: Lessons from the UK Experience. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 65, 339–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flinders, M. V. (2004) Icebergs and MPs: Delegated Governance and Parliament. Parliamentary Affairs, 57, 767–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flinders, M. V. and Smith, M. J. S. (1999) ‘Realizing the Democratic Potential of Quangos’ in M. V. Flinders and M. J. S. Smith (eds.) Quangos, Accountability and Reform: The Politics of Quasi-Government (New York: St. Martin’s Press), pp. 201–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Géradin, D., Mu R. and Petit, N. (eds.) (2005) Regulation Through Agencies in the EU: A New Paradigm of European Governance (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodin, R. E. (ed.) (1996) The Theory of Institutional Design (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, C. (1998) ‘Is There a Crisis in Regulatory Accountability?’ in R. Baldwin, C. Scott and C. Hood (eds.) A Reader in Regulation (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 471–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. W. and Keohane, R. O. (2005) Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics. American Political Science Review, 99, 29–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haque, M. S. (2001) The Diminishing Publicness of Public Service Under the Current Mode of Governance. Public Administration Review, 61, 65–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. (1991) A Public Management for all Seasons? Public Administration, 69, 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, M. J. (1995) The Political Economy of Public Administration: Institutional Choice in the Public Sector (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, J. D. and Shipan, C. R. (2000) The Costs of Control: Legislators, Agencies, and Transaction Costs. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 25, 25–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayasuriya, K. (2008) Regionalising the State: Political Topography of Regulatory Regionalism. Contemporary Politics, 14, 21–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordana, J. and Levi-Faur, D. (eds.) (2004) The Politics of Regulation (Cheltenhan, UK: Edward Elgar).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jordana, J. and Sancho, D. (2004) ‘Regulatory Designs, Institutional Constellations and the Study of the Regulatory State’ in J. Jordana and D. Levi-Faur (eds.) The Politics of Regulation. Institutions and Regulatory Reforms for the Age of Governance (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing), pp. 296–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R. O. and Nye, J. S. (2003) ‘Redefining Accountability for Global Governance’ in M. Kahler and D. Lake (eds.) Governance in a Global Economy: Political Authority in Transition (Princeton: Princeton University Press), pp. 386–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kickert, W. J. M. (2001) Public Management of Hybrid Organizations: Governance of Quasi-Autonomous Executive Agencies. International Public Management Journal, 4, 135–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koop, C. (2011) Explaining the Accountability of Independent Agencies: The Importance of Political Salience. Journal of Public Policy, 31, 209–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koop, C. (2014) Theorizing and Explaining Voluntary Accountability. Public Administration, DOI: 10.1111/padm.12058.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koppell, J. (2003) The Politics of Quasi-Government: Hybrid Organizations and the Dynamics of Bureaucratic Control (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Faur, D. (2011) ‘Regulation and Regulatory Governance’ in D. Levi-Faur (ed.) Handbook on the Politics of Regulation (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing), pp. 7–24.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Faur, D. and Jordana, J. (2005) The Rise of Regulatory Capitalism: The Global Diffusion of a New Order. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598 (1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, M. (2001) From varieties of the welfare state to convergence of the regulatory state. The ‘Europeanization’ of Regulatory Transparency. London: Queen’s Papers on Europeanization, N 10/2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, M. (2004) ‘Accountability and Transparency in Regulation: Critiques, Doctrines and Instruments’ in J. Jordana and D. Levi-Faur (eds.) The Politics of Regulation. Institutions and Regulatory Reforms for the Age of Governance (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing), pp. 124–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loughlin, M. and Scott, C. (1997) ‘The Regulatory State’ in P. Dunleavy, I. Holliday, A. Gamble and G. Peele (eds.) Developments in British Politics 5 (Houndmills: Macmillan), pp. 205–219.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lowi, T. J. (1972) Four Systems of Policy, Politics, and Choice. Public Administration Review, 32, 298–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luban, D. (2002) The Publicity of Law and the Regulatory State. Journal of Political Philosophy, 10, 296–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majone, G. (1994) The Rise of the Regulatory State in Europe. West European Politics, 17, 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majone, G. (1996) Temporal consistency and policy credibility: Why democracies need non-majoritarian institutions. Working paper [Online]

    Google Scholar 

  • Majone, G. (1997) From the Positive to the Regulatory State: Causes and Consequences of Changes in the Mode of Governance. Journal of Public Policy, 17, 139–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majone, G. (1999) The Regulatory State and its Legitimacy Problems. West European Politics, 22, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCubbins, M. D., Noll, R. G. and Weingast, B. R. (1987) Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 3, 243–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, M. (2002) Understanding the Regulatory State. British Journal of Political Science, 32, 391–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulgan, R. (2003) Holding Power to Account: Accountability in Modern Democracies (London: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mulgan, R. (2011) ‘Accountability’ in B. Badie, B. Berg-Schlosser and L. Morlino (eds.) International Encyclopedia of Political Science (Los Angeles, London: SAGE Publications), pp. 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, J. P. (2003) Towards a European Administrative Space? Journal of European Public Policy, 10, 506–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1971) The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, D. and Gaebler, T. (eds.) (1992) Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming Government (Reading, MA: Adison-Wesley Public Company).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasquino, G. (2011) ‘Accountability, Interinstitutional’ in N. Bayne, B. Berg-Schlosser and L. Morlino (eds.) International Encyclopedia of Political Science (Los Angeles, London: SAGE Publications), pp. 16–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G. and Wright, V. (1996) ‘Public Policy and Administration, Old and New’ in R. E. G. Goodin and H.-D. Klingemann (eds.) A New Handbook of Political Science (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 628–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philp, M. (2009) Delimiting Democratic Accountability. Political Studies, 57, 28–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C. (1993) Managerialism and the Public Services: Cuts or Cultural Change? (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C., Talbot, C., Caulfield, J. and Smullen, A. S. (eds.) (2004) Agencies. How Governments Do Things through Semi-Autonomous Organizations (London: Palgrave).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, J. N. (2000) ‘Change, Complexity, and Governance in Globalizing Space’ in J. Pierre (ed.) Debating Governance. Authority, Steering and Democracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 257–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabel, C. F. and Zeitlin, J. (2008) Learning from Difference: The New Architecture of Experimentalist Governance in the EU. European Law Journal, 14, 271–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, C. (2000) Accountability in the Regulatory State. Journal of Law and Society, 27, 38–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schedler, A. (1999) ‘Conceptualizing Accountability’ in A. Schedler, L. Diamond and M. F. Plattner (eds.) The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies (Boulder and London: Lynne Rienner Publishers), pp. 13–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter, P. C. and Trechsel, A. H. (eds.) (2004) The Future of Democracy in Europe: Trends, Analyses and Reforms (Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Self, P. (2000) Rolling Back the State. Economic Dogma & Political Choice (New York: St. Martin’s Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher, M. (2002) Regulation After Delegation: Independent Regulatory Agencies in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 9, 954–972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoest, K., Peters, G. B., Bouckaert, G. and Verschuere, B. (2004) The Study of Organisational Autonomy: A Conceptual Review. Public Administration and Development, 24, 101–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoest, K., Verschure, B. Meyers, F., Peters, B. G. and Bouckaert, G. (2005) Agencification and Accountability Regimes: Upwards and Downwards Accountability in Flanders. In SOG-SCANCOR Workshop, Papers. International Political Science Association. Research Committee 27: Structure and Organization of Government (SOG); Scandinavian Consortium for Organizational Research (SCANCOR).

    Google Scholar 

  • Verschuere, B., Verhoest, K., Meyers, F. and Peters, B. G. (2006) ‘Accountability and Accountability Arrangements in Public Agencies’ in T. Christensen (ed.) Autonomy and Regulation (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar), pp. 268–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vibert, F. (2007) The Rise of the Unelected: Democracy and the New Separation of Powers (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weir, S. (1995) Quangos: Questions of Democratic Accountability. Parliamentary Affairs, 48, 306–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. Q. (ed.) (1980) The Politics of Regulation (New York: Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Jacint Jordana, Andrea C. Bianculli and Xavier Fernández-i-Marín

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jordana, J., Bianculli, A., Fernández-i-Marín, X. (2015). When Accountability Meets Regulation. In: Bianculli, A.C., Fernández-i-Marín, X., Jordana, J. (eds) Accountability and Regulatory Governance. Executive Politics and Governance Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137349583_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics