Chapter Summary
Emerging tissue engineering techniques enable growing animal tissue for human consumption in vitro, without the animals. Growing meat in this way, rather than “on the hoof,” has been promoted as a way to reduce the suffering and eliminate the inefficiencies (and so ecological impacts) associated with animal agriculture. In this chapter, Paul Thompson critically evaluates the case in favor of artificial meat. He argues that the considerations offered in support of it are not decisive, for several reasons — e.g. artificial meat is not likely to displace meat grown on the hoof (for economic and aesthetic reasons), it has not been shown to be more ecological efficient, and it does not provide a substitute for non-meat animal parts such as hides. Moreover, those who are concerned about the industrialization of agriculture are likely to be opposed to artificial meat, since its production will be industrial. Furthermore, the case for synthetic meat involves comparing it to meat produced in concentrated animal feed operations (CAFOs). However, there are other alternatives — less intensive, more humane forms of animal agriculture — that might be preferable to both CAFOs and artificial meat.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Works Cited
Beef Products, Inc. N.D. About. Accessed June 4 2012 at http://www.beefprod-ucts.com/history.php
R. W. Bulliet (2005) Hunters, Herders and Hamburgers: The Past and Future of Human-Animal Relationships (New York: Columbia UniversityPress).
C. Choi (2012) ‘The making of the term ‘pink slime’,’ Associated Press, May 11, 2012. Accessed June 4, 2012 at: http://news.yahoo.com/making-term-pink-slime-173349428.html
C. Diamond (1978) ‘Eating Meat and Eating People,’ Philosophy 53: 465–479.
C. Diamond (2003) ‘The Difficulty of Reality and the Difficulty of Philosophy,’ Partial Answers: Journal of Literature and History of Ideas 1/2: 1–26.
P. D. Edelman, D.C. McFarland, V.A. Mironov, and J.G. Matheny ‘In Vitro Cultured Meat Production,’ Tissue Engineering, May/June 2005, 11(5–6): 659–662
T. Grandin, C. Johnson (2009) Animals Make Us Human: Creating the Best Life for Animals (Orlando, FL: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing).
D. Haraway (2008) When Species Meet (St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota Press).
C. Korsmeyer (2012) ‘Ethical Gourmandism,’ in The Philosophy of Food, D. Kaplan, ed. (Berkeley: University Press of California): 87–102.
H. Pellissier (2012) ‘Nine Ways In-Vitro Meat Will Change Our Lives,’ Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies, Trinity College, Hartford, CT, Accessed May 5, 2012 at http://ieet.org/index.php/IEET/more/5379
M. Pollan (2006) The Omnivore’s Dilemma: A Natural History in Four Meals (New York: Penguin Books).
E. Schlosser (2001) Fast Food Nation: The Dark Side of the American Meal (Boston: Houghton-Mifflin).
A. Toffler (1970) Future Schock (New York: Random House).
S. Wellin, J. Gold and J. Berlin (2012) ‘In Vitro Meat: What Are the Moral Issues?’ In The Philosophy of Food D. Kaplan, ed. (Berkeley: University Press of California): 292–304.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Paul Thompson
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Thompson, P. (2014). Artificial Meat. In: Sandler, R.L. (eds) Ethics and Emerging Technologies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137349088_34
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137349088_34
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-36703-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-34908-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)