Skip to main content

What to Do about Artificial Consciousness

  • Chapter
Ethics and Emerging Technologies
  • 2695 Accesses

Chapter Summary

One of the primary ethical issues related to creating robust artificial intelligences is how to engineer them to ensure that they will behave morally — i.e. that they will consider and treat us appropriately. A much less commonly discussed issue is what their moral status will be — i.e. how we ought to consider and treat them. In this chapter, John Basl takes up the issue of the moral status of artificial consciousnesses. He defends a capacity-based account of moral status, on which an entity’s moral status is determined by the capacities it has, rather than its origins or material composition. An implication of this is that if a machine intelligence has cognitive and psychological capacities like ours, then it would have comparable moral status to us. However, Basl argues that it is highly unlikely that machines will have capacities (and so interests) like ours, and that in fact it will be very difficult to know whether they are conscious and, if they are, what capacities and interests they have.

See also Patrick Lin et al. (Ch. 23) and Wendell Wallach (Ch. 24) in this textbook.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Works Cited

  • J. Basl and R. Sandler (forthcoming) ‘Three Puzzles Regarding the Moral Status of Synthetic Organisms’ in G. Kaebnick (ed.) “Artificial Life: Synthetic Biology and the Bounds of Nature (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Cahen (2002) ‘Against the Moral Considerability of Ecosystems’ in (eds.) Andrew Light and H. Rolston III. Environmental Ethics: An Anthology (Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Chalmers (2010) ‘The Singularity: A Philosophical Analysis,’ Journal of Consciousness Studies 17(9–10): 7–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Cruse, S. Chennu, C. Chatelle, et al. (2011) ‘Bedside Detection of Awareness in the Vegetative State: A Cohort Study,’ The Lancet 378(9809): 2088–2094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Feinberg (1963) ‘The Rights of Animals and Future Generations,’ Columbia Law Review 63: 673.

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Feldman (2004) Pleasure and the Good Life: Concerning the Nature, Varieties and Plausibility of Hedonism (USA: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • K. Goodpaster (1978) ‘On Being Morally Considerable,’ The Journal of Philosophy 75: 308–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. John (2010) ‘State Neutrality and the Ethics of Human Enhancement Technologies,’ The American Journal of Bioethics 1(2): 41–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. G. Millikan (1989) ‘In Defense of Proper Functions,’ Philosophy of Science 56(2): 288–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. G. Millikan (1999) “Wings, Spoons, Pills, and Quills: A Pluralist Theory of Function,” The Journal of Philosophy 96(4): 191–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Neander (1991) ‘Functions as Selected Effects: The Conceptual Analyst’s Defense,’ Philosophy of Science 58(2): 168–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. Neander (2008) “The Teleological Notion of ‘Function’,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69(4) (March 24): 454–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Rawls (1993) Political Liberalism, John Dewey Essays in Philosophy; No. 4. (New York: Columbia University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Sandler (2007) Character and Environment: A Virtue-Oriented Approach to Environmental Ethics. (New York: Columbia University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Sandler and L. Simons (2012) ‘The Value of Artefactual Organisms,’ Environmental Values 21(1): 43–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Singer (2009) Animal Liberation: The Definitive Classic of the Animal Movement. Reissue. (New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics).

    Google Scholar 

  • P. W. Taylor (1989) Respect for Nature Studies in Moral, Political, and Legal Philosophy. (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Tomasello and J. Call (1997) Primate Cognition 1st ed. (USA: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Varner (1998) In Nature’s Interest (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Wright (1973) ‘Functions,’ Philosophical Review 82: 139–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 John Basl

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Basl, J. (2014). What to Do about Artificial Consciousness. In: Sandler, R.L. (eds) Ethics and Emerging Technologies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137349088_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics