Skip to main content

Traditional and New Media — About Amplification and Negation

  • Chapter
The Psychology of Pro-Environmental Communication

Abstract

This chapter analyses the role of media and other actors in defining the perception of environmental risks by the public. First, an introduction to the specificities of different media types, including old and new media, books, and art is given. The basic theories in risk perception are presented, including the psychometric paradigm, the cultural theory of risk perception, the protection motivation theory, and the social amplification of risk framework (SARF). Their importance for risk communication in the environmental domain is discussed. The chapter ends with insights from the newsroom on how media actors select and present news and what their work patterns imply for designing environmental communication. The conclusion presents concrete advice for environmental media campaigns based on the research presented in this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 37.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Suggested readings

  • Breakwell, G. M. (2007). The psychology of risk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson, J. X., Kasperson, R. E., Pidgeon, N., & Slovic, P. (2003). The social amplification of risk: Assessing fifteen years of research and theory. In N. Pigeon, R. E. Kasperson & P. Slovic (Eds.), The Social Amplification of Risk (pp. 13–46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniels, T., Axelrod, L. J., & Slovic, P. (1996). Perceived ecological risks of global change: A psychometric comparison of causes and consequences. Global Environmental Change, 6(2), 159–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M., Ellis, R., & Wildavsky, A. (1990). Cultural theory. Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floyd, D. L., Prentice-Dunn, S., & Rogers, R. W. (2000). A meta-analysis of research on protection motivation theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(2), 407–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2015 Christian A. Klöckner

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Klöckner, C.A. (2015). Traditional and New Media — About Amplification and Negation. In: The Psychology of Pro-Environmental Communication. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137348326_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics