Abstract
It seems to go without saying that decadence is a movement defined by negation. The decadents are always against something that oth- ers value: reality, society femininity nature, morality, public life, and so forth. In his celebrated essay on Charles Baudelaire, Paul Bourget describes decadent style as a falling away from social cohesion. Healthy societies subordinate the individual ‘cells’ to the larger organism, but a decadent society puts the parts above the whole: ‘A style of decadence is one in which the unity of the book is decomposed to make way for the independence of the page, the page is decomposed to make way for the independence of the sentence, and the sentence makes way for the independence of the word.’1 In Degeneration(1892), Max Nordau writes that while ‘The ordinary man always seeks to think, to feel, and to do exactly the same as the multitude; the decadent seeks to do exactly the contrary.’2 Twentieth-century critics such as Jonathan Dollimore have revised this judgment, casting decadent deviation as a subver- sive counter-cultural strategy. Oscar Wilde’s epigrammatic inversions of received wisdom, for example, anticipate deconstructive rewritings of binary oppositions: ‘Wilde’s transgressive aesthetic subverted the dominant categories of subjectivity which kept desire in subjection, subverted the essentialist categories of identity which kept morality in place.’3
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Paul Boutget, Essais de psychologie contemporaine (Paris: Lemerre, 1883), p. 25.
Max Nordau, Degeneration (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1993), p. 306.
Jonathan Dollimore, Sexual Dissidence: Augustine to Wilde, Freud to Foucault (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991), p. 68.
Stéphane Mallarmé, Œuvres, ed. Y.-A. Favre (Paris: Bordas, 1992), p. 153.
Théophile Gautier, Baudelaire par Gautier, ed. Claude-Marie Senninger and Lois Cassandra Hamrick (Paris: Klincksieck, 1986), p. 119.
Algernon Charles Swinburne, William Blake, ed. Hugh J. Luke (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1970), pp. 303–4, 36.
Charles Baudelaire, Œuvres completes, ed. C. Pichois, 2 vols. (Paris: Gallimard, 1975), I, pp. 114–15.
Walter Pater, Gaston de Latour: The Revised Text, ed. Gerald Monsman (Greensboro, NC: ELT, 1995), pp. 26–7.
Oscar Wilde, The Complete Works of Oscar Wilde, III: The Picture of Dorian Gray, ed. Joseph Bristow (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), pp. 188–9
George Moore, Confessions of a Young Man (London: Heinemann, 1928), p. 3.
See John Guillory Cultural Capital (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993).
See Sharon Marcus, ‘Salome!! Sarah Bernhardt, Oscar Wilde, and the Drama of Celebrity’, PMLA, 126 (2011), p. 1008.
Oscar Wilde, Salome, ed. P. Aquien (Paris: Gallimard, 1993), p. 44.
Charles Bemheimer, ‘Fetishism and Decadence: Salome’s Severed Heads’, in Fetishism as Cultural Discourse, ed. E. Apter and W. Pietz (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993), p. 76.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Matthew Potolsky
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Potolsky, M. (2013). In Praise of Decadence: The Epideictic Mode from Baudelaire to Wilde. In: Hall, J.D., Murray, A. (eds) Decadent Poetics. Palgrave Studies in Nineteenth-Century Writing and Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137348296_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137348296_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-46762-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-34829-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)