Abstract
Elizabeth Wilson once called social policy “a series of constructions created by men for the purpose of shaping women’s lives” (Wilson 1977: 25), identifying this as a device of the patriarchal welfare state based on the modern family model aimed at keeping women oppressed and disciplined.1 According to Wilson, social policy is nothing else but “the ordering of domestic life by the state,” controlling women by assigning them a maternal role.2 Following Wilson’s intuition, this chapter seeks to uncover and enlighten three selection principles within Japanese social policy by which the state handles, intervenes, and orders human — and especially women’s — lives. I do so by focusing especially on the Fujin Hogo Jiyo, a welfare scheme aimed at assisting women in need of protection. In the concluding part, I also sketch some of the reasons why an unconditional basic income can be viewed as a more inclusive policy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abramovitz, Mimi. 1988. Regulating the Lives of Women: Social Welfare Policy from Colonial Times to the Present. Cambridge: South End Press.
Bebel, August. 1904. Women under Socialism. New York: New York Labor News Co., English translation of Die Frau und der Sozialismus (1879).
Dalla Costa, Mariarosa. 1986. Kaji rodo ni chingin o [Wages for Housework], translated by Ida Kumiko and Itoh Kimio. Tokyo: Inpakuto Shuppankai.
Esping-Andersen, Gosta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Fraser, Nancy. 1996. Justice interruptus: Critical Reflections on the “Postsocialist” Condition. London: Routledge.
Geremek, Bronislaw. 1994. Poverty. A History. Oxford: Blackwell.
Handler, Joel, F. 1992. “The Modern Pauper: The Homelessness in Welfare History,” pp. 35–46 in Homelessness: A National Perspective, edited by Marjorie J. Robertson, and Milton Greenblatt. New York: Plenum Press.
Hayashi, Chiyo. 1990. “Sei no shohinka ni tsuite [On the Commodification of Sex],” pp. 5–18 in Sei no shohinka ni kansuru kenkyui [Research concerning the Commodification of Sex], edited by Tokyo Metropolitan Government Bureau of Citizens and Culture. Tokyo: Tokyo Metropolitan Government Bureau of Citizens and Culture.
Hayashi, Chiyo, and Hori, Chizuko, eds. 2000. Fujin Fukushi Iinkai kara Fujin Hogo Iinkai e [From the Women’s Welfare Committee to the Women’s Protection Committee]. Tokyo: Tokyo Sobunsha.
Hayashi, Chiyo, ed. 2004. Josei Fukushi to wa nani ka: sono hitsuyosei to teigen [What is Women’s Welfare? Its Necessity and Proposals]. Kyoto: Mineruva Shobo.
Iwata, Masami. 2005. “Seisaku to hinkon [Government policy and poverty].” 15–41 in Hinkon to Shakaiteki Haijo: Fukushi shakai o mushibamu mono [Poverty and Social Exclusion: Undermining the Welfare Society], edited by Masami Iwata and Akihiko Nishizawa. Kyoto: Mineruva Shobo.
Katada, Kaori. 2011. “Feminizumu to shakai seisaku [Feminism and Social Policy],” pp. 179–211 in Shakai seisaku no shiten gendai shakai to fukushi wo kaneru [The Perspective of Social Policy: Thoughts on Contemporary Society and Welfare], edited by Yoichi Akutsu, Kaori Katada, Ju Kaneko, Takanao Nishimura, and Yusuke Hatamoto. Kyoto: Horitsu Bunkasha.
Katada, Kaori. 2012. “Shakai hosho/shakai Fukushi ni okeru haijo to hosetsu [Exclusion and Inclusion in Social Security and Social Welfare]” 87–112 in Rodo Saisan 6: Rodo to Seizonken_ [Labor Retrial 6: Labor and the Right to Live], edited by Toru Yamamori. Tokyo: Otsuki Shoten.
Lewis, Jane. 1997. “Gender and welfare regimes. Further Thoughts.” Social Politics 4 (2): 160–177.
Lister, Ruth. 1994. “‘She has other duties’. Women, Citizenship and Social Security.” 31–44 in Social Security and Social Change, edited by Sally Baldwin, and Jane Falkingham. London: Prentice-Hall.
Miller, Dorothy. 1990. Women and Social Welfare: a Feminist Analysis. New York: Praeger
Orloff, Ann Shola. 1993. “Gender and the social rights of citizenship: the Comparative Analysis of Gender Relations and the Welfare States.” American Sociological Review 58 (3): 303–328.
Parker, Hermione, ed. 1993. Citizen’s Income and Women. London: CISC.
Pateman, Carol. 2006. “Democratizing Citizenship: Some Advantages of a Basic Income,” pp. 101–119 in Redesigning Distribution, edited by Bruce Ackerman, Anne Alstott, and Philippe Van Parijs. London: Verso.
Sainsbury, Diane. 1996. Gender, Equality and Welfare States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sudo, Yachiyo. 2010. “‘Jose fukushi’ ron to Feminizumu riron [‘Women’s Welfare’ Theory and Feminist Theory].” Shakai Fukushi Kenkyu 12: 25–32, Aichi: Aichi Prefectoral University.
Sudo, Yachiyo. 2011. “Fujin hogo shisetsu no genzai to sono rironteki kensho [The Present State of Women’s Protection Facilities and Their Theoretical Verification].” Shakai Fukushi Kenkyu 13: 11–23, Aichi: Aichi Prefectoral University.
Takegawa Shogo. 2007. Rentai to Shonin [Solidarity and Recognition]. Tokyo: Tokyo Daigaku Shuppankai.
Wilson, Elizabeth. 1977. Women and the Welfare State, London: Tavistock.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2014 Yannick Vanderborght and Toru Yamamori
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Katada, K. (2014). Beyond the Three Selection Principles of Welfare Policy (Work, Family, and Belonging): Toward a Reconsideration of the Fujin Hogo Jigyo (Women’s Protection Project) in Japan. In: Vanderborght, Y., Yamamori, T. (eds) Basic Income in Japan. Exploring the Basic Income Guarantee. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137348081_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137348081_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-47052-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-34808-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)