Skip to main content

Cloud and the Diffusion of Innovation

  • Chapter
Moving to the Cloud Corporation

Abstract

The First Law of Technology applies to cloud. The law says: We invariably overestimate the short-term impact of new technologies, while underestimating their long-term effects.1 In his work on the future of the Internet John Naughton makes a strong case for this law. Certainly, it is clear that if the much hyped take-off period from 1995 ended in the bursting of the ‘e-business bubble’ in 2000/01, all predictions of its impact now have to go way beyond the technology and hi-tech sectors, into widespread social, economic, indeed global impacts.2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 37.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See Naughton, J. (1999) A Brief History of The Future. The Origins of the Internet. London, Phoenix.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See also Naughton, J. (2008) ‘Thanks, Gutenberg — But We’re Too Pressed for Time to Read.’ The Observer January 27, p. 12 Business section.

    Google Scholar 

  3. As just one example see ECISM (2009) Future Internet 2020: Visions of an Industry Expert Group. Brussels, EC Information Society and Media.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Freeman, C. and Louca, F. (2001) As Time Goes By: From Industrial Revolution To Information Revolution. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hagel, J. and Seeley Brown, J. (2010) Cloud Computing — Storms on the Horizon. Boston, MA, Deloitte Center for the Edge.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Willcocks, L. P., Cullen, S. and Craig, A. (2011) The Outsourcing Enterprise. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Retana, G. F., Forman, C., Narasimhan, S., Niculescu, M. F. and Wu, D. J. (2012) ‘Technical Support and IT Capacity Demand: Evidence from the Cloud.’ Thirty-third International Conference on Information Systems, Orlando, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Xue, M. and Harker, P. T. (2002) ‘Customer Efficiency.’ Journal of Service Research, 4(4): 253–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Also Xue, M., Hitt, L. M., and Harker, P. T. (2007) ‘Customer Efficiency, Channel Usage and Firm Performance in Retail Banking.’ Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 9(4): 535–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Greenhalgh, T., Glenn, R., MacFarlane, F., Bate, P., and Kyriakidou, O. (2004) ‘Diffusion of Innovation in Service Organizations: Systematic Review and Recommendations.’ Milbank Quarterly, 82(4): 581–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Venters, W. and Whitley, E. A. (2012) ‘A Critical Review of Cloud Computing: Researching Desires and Realities.’ Journal of Information Technology, 27(3): 179–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Whitley, E. A. and Willcocks, L. P. (2011) ‘Achieving Step-change in Outsourcing Maturity: Toward Collaborative Innovation.’ MIS Quarterly Executive, 10(3): 95–109.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Greenhalgh, Glenn, MacFarlane, Bate, and Kyriakidou, op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  15. See also Lacity, M. and Willcocks, L. (2012) Advanced Outsourcing Practice: Rethinking ITO, BPO and Cloud Services. London, Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A recent paper shows that information technology innovations often move in packs and this seems to be the case with cloud. It is the interactions between base technology innovations, technology service innovations and technology process innovations that made Internet computing, and will make cloud, a disruptive, radical IT innovation. See Carlo, J., Lyytinen, K., and Rose, G. (2011) ‘Internet Computing as a Disruptive Technology: The Role of Strong Order Effects.’ Information Systems Journal, 21: 91–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Some research sees the cloud disruptive sequence being 1. new delivery models, 2. technology disruption, 3. restructuring the IT industry and 4. disruption of other industries. See Hagel and Seeley Brown, op. cit. We see technological disruption being cumulative and ongoing. Clearly cloud does introduce new delivery models, which we see as maturing over time. Here, we are particularly interested in how these delivery models will need to grow the service dimension and produce business services. Undoubtedly there is already disruption of the IT supply industry, as documented in our previous paper. In this chapter we focus on how businesses and government agencies will innovate in their practices, structures, processes, and market offerings.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Interview with Jimmy Harris, Accenture, November 2010. Quoted in Willcocks, L., Venters, W. and Whitley, E. (2011) Cloud and the Future of Business 4 — Innovation. London, Accenture/Outsourcing Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Interview with Steve Beck, December 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Barzilai-Nahon, K. and Mason, R. M. (2010) ‘How Executives Perceive the Net Generation.’ Information, Communication and Society, 13(3): 396–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Interview with Tim Barker, SalesForce.com, November 2010. Quoted in Willcocks, Venters and Whitley, op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Interview with Mike Dino DiPetrollo, November 2010. Quoted in Willcocks, Venters and Whitley, op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  23. See Willcocks, L. Petherbridge, P. and Olson, N. (2003) Making IT Count: Strategy, Delivery and Infrastructure, London, Palgrave, for a detailed assessment of how IT is managed and the typical problems IT functions face.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Interview with Tim Barker, SalesForce.com, op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Interview with Jim Spooner, November 2010. Quoted in Willcocks, Venters and Whitley, op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  27. One famous case is of a pharmaceutical company that paid for capability with a credit card and got the results of the analysis sooner and cheaper than via a formal, in-house request to computing resources.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Interview with Jimmy Harris, op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Interview with David Leyland, Glasshouse, July 2010. Quoted in Willcocks, Venters and Whitley, op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Interview with Jimmy Harris, op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Interview with Steve Furminger, December 2010. Quoted in Willcocks, Venters and Whitley, op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Interview with Kevin Lees, November 2010. Quoted in Willcocks, Venters and Whitley, op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Interview with Jim Rivera, SalesForce.com, November 2010. Quoted in Willcocks, Venters and Whitley, op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Interview with Russell Marsh, December 2010. Quoted in Willcocks, Venters and Whitley, op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Interview with Stephanie Lester, Glasshouse, November 2012. Quoted in Willcocks, L. and Lacity, M. (2012) The Emerging IT Outsourcing Landscape: From Innovation to Cloud Services. London, Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Interview with Jimmy Harris, op cit.

    Google Scholar 

  39. See O’Reilly III, C. and Tushman, M. (2004) ‘The Ambidextrous Organization.’ Harvard Business Review, 82(4): 74–81.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Brown, J. S. (2003) ‘Does IT Matter? Letter to the Editor.’ Harvard Business Review (July): 109–12.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Interview with Jim Rivera, op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Britton, D., P. Clark, et al. (2004) ‘A Grid for Par ticle Physics — From Testbed to Production.’ GridPP www.Gridpp.ac.uk.

  43. See also Berman, F. and Hey, T. (2004) ‘The Scientific Imperative.’ In: I. Foster and C. Kesselman (eds) The Grid 2. San Francisco, CA, Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Zheng, Y., Venters, W. and Cornford, T. (2011) ‘Agility, Paradox and Organizational Improvisation: The Development of a Par ticle Physics Grid.’ Information Systems Journal, 21(4): 303–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. For more information on our research on the innovative management practices of particle physicists at CERN see www.pegasus.lse.ac.uk — a five-year research study of their Grid Development. Pegasus is funded by the UK EPSRC research council — Grant no. EP/D049954/1.

  46. Traweek, S. (1988) Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physics. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999) Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  48. The examples are anonymous as at September 2013 as we were still researching the cases and seeking permissions. However, the Fortune 500 companies include two global retailers and the SMEs include a cloud-based business in the art industry. Relevant working papers can be accessed at www.outsourcingunit.org as they are published.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Leslie Willcocks, Will Venters and Edgar A. Whitley

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Willcocks, L., Venters, W., Whitley, E.A. (2014). Cloud and the Diffusion of Innovation. In: Moving to the Cloud Corporation. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137347473_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics