Skip to main content

The Russo-Turkish Labyrinth and the Cyprus-Egypt-Israel-Greece Rapprochement

  • Chapter

Abstract

This chapter will attempt to identify tendencies and proclivities by a number of actors who are protagonistic, or aspire to be such, in the convoluted geopolitical developments of the Eastern Mediterranean and the adjacent region. Questions to be raised include whether Moscow and Ankara can go beyond their material embrace to some kind of more complex interdependence; what could be the — potentially damaging — role of Turkey’s idiosyncratic political culture in Russia-Turkey relations; how far might these developing relations affect negatively Russia’s pragmatic-idealist bonds with Cyprus; what are, after all, Turkey’s overambitious geopolitical designs and how could Cyprus react to Ankara’s gunboat diplomacy and other provocations; how promising is the tripartite association of Cyprus and Greece first with Egypt and then with Israel; what, in the final analysis, can be surmised about American and British geopolitical aspirations and designs vis-à-vis Cyprus, Israel, Egypt, Greece and Turkey; and how does the Russian Federation appear to fit in this grand regional chessboard. The final chapter will explore the immediate implications of all the above for Russia-Cyprus relations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Costas Melakopides, “Political Culture”, Dictionary of International Relations and Foreign Policy: History, Theory, Terminology (Athens: I. Sideris, 1998), pp. 391–393 (in Greek).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Selim Deringil, “Turkish Foreign Policy since Ataturk”, in Clement H. Dodd (ed.), Turkish Foreign Policy: New Prospects (Huntingdon: The Eothen Press, 1992), pp. 2–6.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hercule Millas, Images of Greeks and Turks: School Books, Historiography, Literature and National Stereotypes (Athens: Alexandria, 2001) (in Greek), pp. 39–40.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bahri Yilmaz, “Turkey’s New Role in International Politics,” Aussenpolitik, Vol. 45, No. 1, 1994, p. 90.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Deringil, op. cit., p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Niazi Kizilyurek, “Mumtaz Soysal: From Kemalism to Neoturkism,” in Theodore Couloumbis and Thanos Dokos (eds.), Review of Defense and Foreign Policy 2001: Greece and the World, 2000–2001 (Athens: ELIAMEP-Parateretes, 2001), p. 62 (in Greek).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Donald M. Payne, “Security in the Eastern Mediterranean: Bargaining with Law Breakers,” Mediterranean Quarterly, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2003, p. 25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Deringil, op. cit., p. 2 (emphasis added).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kemal Kirisci, “Turkey and the United States: Ambivalent Allies”, in Barry Rubin and Thomas Keaney (eds.), US Allies in a Changing World, BESA studies in international security (London: Frank Cass, 2001), p. 126.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Costas Melakopides, “Turkey’s Political Culture as a Necessary Condition for Decoding its Policies Towards Cyprus, Greece and the European Union”, Journal of Political and Military Sociology, Vol. 34, No. 2 Winter 2006, pp. 301–17.

    Google Scholar 

  12. For a perceptive introduction to Davutoglu’s thinking, see Ioannis N. Grigoriadis, “The Davutoglu Doctrine and Turkish Foreign Policy”, Working Paper No 8/2010, ELIAMEP, Athens, April 2010. On p. 4, Grigoriadis wrote: “In Davutoglu’s view, Turkey is a Middle Eastern, Balkan, Caucasian, Central Asian, Mediterranean, Gulf and Black Sea country, can simultaneously exercise influence in all these regions and thus claim a global strategic role”.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ahmet Davutoglu, Strategic Depth: Turkey’s International Position (Athens: Piotita, 2010) (in Greek), p. 200 (my translation).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ibid., p. 279, emphasis added.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zvi Magen and Gallia Lindenstrauss, “Russian-Turkish Relations: Contemporary Dilemmas of Past Empires”, INSS, Strategic Assessment, Vol. 16, No. 2, July 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ibid., p. 69.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 Costas Melakopides

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Melakopides, C. (2016). The Russo-Turkish Labyrinth and the Cyprus-Egypt-Israel-Greece Rapprochement. In: Russia-Cyprus Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137347152_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics