Abstract
Teachers are more than technicians, more than doers. The old saying that “those who can do, those who can’t teach” can no longer be applied to teachers in the twenty-first century. Those who engage in teaching, whatever their title (educator, carer, teacher, pedagogista), are required to understand why they do what they do at both the theoretical and the technical levels. The authors in this collection have discussed how teachers engaged in research, at various levels of engagement, are supported in new ways to rethink their taken-for-granted ways of working, to be troubled within their pedagogical habits, to encounter tensions and uncertainties around and about best practice or evidence-based practices. Alongside the teachers, the partners in the research, whatever their title (university researcher, academic researcher, outsider, expert researcher, research associate), are challenged to rethink their areas of expertise, to reassess what counts as knowledge, to encounter uncertainty, diversity, innovation in ways and forms that challenge traditional research methods, traditional ways of writing in the academic world, and more familiar forms of knowledge, understanding, and learning. Across the chapters the authors have provided examples where the partnership of teachers and researchers has challenged predictable, linear, causal links among professional development, research, and teacher transformation. Each chapter has provided the context and examples that highlight the importance of teachers engaged in research—whatever method or form that this may have taken.
[T]eaching as profession in itself nowadays is seen as an area of knowledge, being a subject of inquiry and research. The dichotomy between head and hand is in this respect a thing of the past. Teachers should be good doers because they are qualified as good ‘knowers’. Not all teachers are expected to be scholars but all teacher students urgently need to be trained in critical thought and theoretical reasoning. This is the major task and possibility of educational research today.
(Franck, 2006, p. 9)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Brennan, M., Everiss, L., & Mara, D. (2011). Field-based early childhood teacher education: “But they are already teachers …” Summary report. Wellington, NZ: Teaching Learning Research Initiative. Retrieved from http://www.tlri.org.nz/cross-sector-list.
Brown, T., & Jones, L. (2001). Action research and postmodernism: Congruence and critique. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Clarkin-Phillips, J., & Carr, M. (n. d.). Strengthening responsive and reciprocal relationships in a Whānau Tangata centre: An action research project. Summary report. Wellington, NZ: Teaching Learning Research Initiative. Retrieved from http://www.tlri.org.nz/strengthening-responsive-and-reciprocal-relationshipswh%C3%A4nau-tangata-centre-action-research-project/.
Cochrane-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999). The teacher research movement: A decade later. Educational Researcher, 28 (7), 15–25.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Franck, E. (2006). Foreword. In T. S. Popkewitz, K. Petersson, U. Olsson, & J. Kowalczyk (Eds.), “The future is not what it appears to be.” Pedagogy, genealogy and political epistemology. In honor and in memory of Kenneth Hultqvist (p. 9). Stockholm, Sweden: HLS Förlag.
Garvey Berger, J., & Baker, R. (2008). Developing new knowledge and practice through teacher—researcher partnerships? Discussion paper. Wellington, NZ: Teaching and Learning Initiative, New Zealand Council for Educational Research. Retrieved from http://www.tlri.org.nz/tlri-research/discussion-papers.
Gilmore, A. (2007). Review of the teachingand learning research initiative: Discussion paper Wellington, NZ: Teaching and Learning Research Initiative. Retrieved from http://www.tlri.org.nz/tlri-research/discussion-papers.
Mayo, E. (2006). Researching together: Praxis-based research among practitioners. In C. Mutch (Ed.), Challenging the notion of “other.” Reframing research in the Aotearoa New Zealand context (pp. 119–140). Wellington, NZ: NZCER Press.
Meade, A. (2010, November). The contribution of ECE Centres of Innovation to building knowledge about teaching and learning 2003–2010. Paper presented to TLRI Early Years Symposium. Wellington, NZ: Teaching and Learning Research Initiative.
Nuttall, J. (2010, November). The contribution of The Teaching And Learning Research Initiative to building knowledge about teaching and learning: A review of early years projects, 2004–2010. Paper presented to TLRI Early Years Symposium. Wellington, NZ: Teaching and Learning Research Initiative.
Oliver, A. (2005). The TLRI: Teachers’ perspectives on partnership and research. Final summary. Wellington, NZ: Teaching and Learning Research Initiative. Retrieved from http://www.tlri.org.nz/tlri-research/discussion-papers.
Olsson, L. M. (2009). Movement and experimentation in young children’s learning: Deleuze and Guattari in early childhood education. London, UK: Routledge.
Potter, G. (2001). The power of collaborative research in teacher’s professional development. Australian Journal of Early Childhood Education, 26 (2), 8–13.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Judith Duncan and Lindsey Conner
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Duncan, J., Conner, L. (2013). Conclusion: Research Partnerships in Early Years Education. In: Duncan, J., Conner, L. (eds) Research Partnerships in Early Childhood Education. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137346889_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137346889_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-46851-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-34688-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Education CollectionEducation (R0)