Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Corporate Security at Ford Motor Company: From the Great War to the Cold War

  • Chapter
Corporate Security in the 21st Century

Part of the book series: Crime Prevention and Security Management ((CPSM))

Abstract

In the history of industrialization, few security challenges were as important or vexing to employers as labor discipline. Quaintly called ‘the labor question’ by Gilded Age and Progressive Era observers, employers’ need for a ready supply of workers and their desire to obtain maximum surplus value from them incited perpetual confrontation over wages, hours, working conditions, and productivity. Nowhere in the industrial world did this struggle play out more violently than in the US. A National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) report from 1936 (U.S. Senate, 1936: 71–77; NLRB, 1941) listed over 200 contemporary detective agencies engaged in industrial espionage and strikebreaking services, accounting for an estimated 10,000 ‘agents,’ not including the private ‘secret service systems’ maintained by many large industrial corporations (Weiss, 1986). Among the fiercest fighting occurred in the auto-making industry, where by 1937 employers spent millions of dollars annually on hundreds of thousands of spies, provocateurs, and strikebreakers, supported by munitions fit for serious warfare, including tear gas and Gatling guns (Huberman, 1937; U.S. Senate, 1937c, 1939c).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ackerman, K.D. (2007) Young J. Edgar: Hoover, the Red Scare, and the Assault on Civil Liberties. New York: Carroll & Graf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, O. (1997) ‘Depression of 1920–1921.’ in D. Glasner and T. F. Cooley (eds) Business Cycles and Depressions: An Encyclopedia. New York: Garland Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonio, R.J. and A. Bonanno (1996) ‘Post-Fordism in the United States: The Poverty of Market-centered Democracy.’ in J.M. Lehmann (ed.) Current Perspectives in Social Theory. vol. 16 Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arensen, E. (2003) ‘Specter of the Black Strikebreaker: Race, Employment, and Labor Activism in the Industrial Era.’ Labor History 44/3: 319–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailer, L.H. (1943) ‘The Negro Automobile Worker.’ Journal of Political Economy 51/5:415–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, J.E. (1964) ‘Inmate Self-Government.’ Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science 55/1: 39–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, H. (1987) FORD: We Never Called Him Henry. New York: TOR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beynon, H. (1973) Working for Ford. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brecher, J. (1977) Strike! Boston: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, D. (1993) In Labor’s Cause. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brueggemann, J. (2000) ‘The Power and Collapse of Paternalism: The Ford Motor Company and Black Workers, 1937–1941.’ Social Problems 47/2: 220–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan, F.R. (1993) Henry’s Lieutenants. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Business Week (1941) ‘Ford’s Partner.’ 28 June 1941: 40–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Business Week (1945a) ‘Ford Runs Ford.’ 6 October 1945: 18–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Business Week (1945b) ‘Ford Employs New Strategy.’ 8 December 1945: 96–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Business Week (1946) ‘BI’s Old Grads.’ 20 July 1946: 19–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coopey, R. and A. McKinlay (2010) ‘Power without Knowledge? Foucault and Fordism: 1900–50.’ Labor History 51/1: 107–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, R.W. (1929) Labor and Automobiles. New York: International Publishers Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, S. (1958) ‘The Ford Motor Company and the N.R.A.’ The Business History Review 32/4 (Winter): 353–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foner, S. (1974) Organized Labor and the Black Worker. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, R.B. (1993) Henry’s Lieutenants. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1979) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartman, D. (1986) Auto Slavery; The Labor Process in the American Automobile Industry, 1897–1950. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1961) Asylums. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci, A. (1934/2011) Prison Notebooks. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough, E. (1919) The Authorized History of the American Protective League. Chicago: The Reilly & Lee Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hounshell, D.A. (1984) From the American System to Mass Production — 1800–1932. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huberman, L. (1937) The Labor Spy Racket. New York: Modern Age Books, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joh, E.E. (2004) ‘The Paradox of Private Policing.’ Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 95/1 (Fall): 49–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joh, E.E. (2006) ‘The Forgotten Threat, Private Policing and the State.’ Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 13/2: 357–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, T. B. (2008) ‘Power, Institutions and Organizations.’ in R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, and K. Sahlin (eds) The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.L. (1979) ‘Ford Motor Company and the Unions.’ Working Paper No. 181, Graduate School of Business Administration, The University of Michigan. Digitalized 30 November. 2005–2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, N. (1982) Labor’s War at Home: The CIO in World War II. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, N. and Stephen Meyer (1989) On the Line: Essays in the History of Auto Work. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarten, J. (1940a) ‘The Little Man in Henry Ford’s Basement, Part I.’ The American Mercury 50: 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarten, J. (1940b) ‘The Little Man in Henry Ford’s Basement, Part II.’ The American Mercury 50: 200–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinlay, A. and J. Wilson (2012) ‘All they Lose is the Scream’: Foucault, Ford and Mass Production.’ Management and Organizational History 7/4: 45–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, E.A. (2007) ‘Detroit and the Great Migration 1916–1929,’ Bentley Historical Library, University of Michigan. http://bentley.umich.edu/research/publications/migration/ch3.php

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, S. (1981) The Five Dollar Day: Labor Management and Social Control in the Ford Motor Company 1908–192. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, S. (1989) ‘The Persistence of Fordism: Workers and Technology in the American Automobile Industry, 1900–1960.’ in N. Lichtenstein and S. Meyer (eds) On The Line: Essays in the History of Auto Work. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, D. (1987) The Fall of the House of Labor: The Workplace, the State, and American Labor Activism, 1865–1925. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • National Industrial Conference Board (2009) ‘Wartime Changes in the Cost of Living, July, 1914-November, 1918.’ Reprint, Cornell University Library 6 April (Org. 1919).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Labor Relations Board (1941) Fifth Annual Report of NLRB: Interference, Restraint, and Coercion in the Exercise of the Rights Guaranteed in Section 7 of the Act.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevins, Allan and Frank Ernest Hill (1954) FORD: Expansion and Challenge, 1915–1933. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevins, Allan and Frank Ernest Hill (1963) FORD: Decline and Rebirth. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York Times (1903) ‘United War on Unions.’ 5 December: A1.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York Times (1920) ‘Quitting of Ford By Many Officials Causes Commotion.’ 31 January: 1A.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York Times (1930) ‘Keep Dearborn Dry, Ford Officers Urge;Motor Company’s Service Department Cooperates with Police at Chief’s Request,’ 18 April: A1.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York Times (1931) ‘Ford Charges Heeded. Detroit Mayor Considers Check of 32,000 Families Getting Dole.’ 16 June: A1.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York Times (1937a) ‘Ford’s Men form own Union of 7,000.’ 5 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York Times (1937b) ‘Ford Men Called Typical Hoodlums.’ 19 July: 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York Times (1937c) ‘NLRB Finds Ford Guilty of Violating Labor Law.’ 24 December: A1.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York Times (1941) ‘Charges Ford Put Spies in Factory.’ 29 April: A1

    Google Scholar 

  • New York Times (1945) ‘Ford Appoints Bugas to Supplant Bennett.’ 28 September: A1.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York Times (1947) ‘Post to FBI Ex-Agent.’ 25 September: 44.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York Times (1955) ‘Ford Among Last to Accept Union.’ 7 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York Times (1968) ‘John Bugas, near 60, to Retire from 2 Executive Posts at Ford.’ 23 April: 1A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norwood, S. (1996) ‘Ford’s Brass Knuckles.’ Labor History 37/3: 365–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novak, W.J. (2008) ‘The Myth of the “Weak” American State.’ American Historical Review June: 752–772.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, W. J. (2010) ‘Law and the Social Control of American Capitalism.’ Emory Law Journal 60: 377–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole, G. (1978) The Private Sector. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, R.B. (1932) ‘Ford’s Voice Potent in Dearborn Affairs.’ New York Times 10 April: 1A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roediger, D. R. and E. D. Esch (2012) The Production of Difference: Race and the Management of Labor in U.S. History. New York: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, L. (1937) ‘Five Ford Workers Named in Attack;Ford Men Called “Typical Hoodlums.” ‘New York Times 8 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, L. (1941a) ‘River Rouge Strikers Wrecked Airplane Tools, Company States.’ New York Times 5 April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, L. (1941b) ‘Henry Ford Signs C.I.O Contract, Giving All It Asks.’ New York Times 21 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stefanick, Adam (2011) ‘Personality and Power in the Ford Motor Company Hierarchy: The Story of Harry Bennett, 1916–1945.’ Bachelor of Arts Honors Thesis, Department of History, University of Michigan, 30 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sward, Keith (1968) The Legend of Henry Ford. New York: Russell & Russell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, G. (1958) The Society of Captives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Senate. Violations of Free Speech and Right of Labor. Subcommittee on Education and Labor. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Senate. (1936) Hearing before a Subcommittee on Education and Labor on S. Res. 266. United States Government Printing Office: 1936. 74th Cong., First Sess.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Senate. (1937a) Industrial Espionage. Report No. 46, Part 3. 75th Cong., Second Sess.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Senate. (1937b) Corporations Auxiliary Co. Chrysler Corporation. Part 4. 75th Cong. First Sess.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Senate. (1937c) Labor Espionage. General Motors Corporation (Concluded). Part 7. Open Shop Activities. Industrial Munitioning. 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Senate. (1939a) Strikebreaking Services. Report No. 6, Part 1. 76th Cong., 1st Sess.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Senate. (1939b) Private Police Systems. Report No. 6, Part 2. 76th Cong., 1st Sess.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Senate. (1939c) Industrial Munitions. Report No. 6, Part 3. 75th Cong., 1st Sess.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Senate. (1939d) Labor Espionage and Strikebreaking. Reports No. 6, Part 2. 76th Cong., 1st Sess.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waskow, A.I. (1967) From Race Riot to Sit-in: 1919 and the 1960s: A Study in the Connections Between Conflict and Violence. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, J. (1968) The Corporate Ideal in the Liberal State: 1900–1918. Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weir, S. (1975) ‘American Labor on the Defensive: A 1940’s Odyssey.’ Radical America 9/4–5: 163–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, R.P. (1986) ‘Private Detective Agencies and Labour Discipline in the United States, 1855–1946.’ The Historical Journal 29/1: 87–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, R.P. (1987) ‘From “Slugging Detectives” to “Labor Relations”: Policing Labor at Ford, 1930–1947.’ in C. Shearing and P. Stenning (eds) Private Policing. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, R.P. (2008) ‘From Cowboy-Detectives to Soldiers of Fortune: The Recrudescence of Primitive Accumulation Security and Its Contradictions on the New Frontiers of Capitalist Expansion.’ Social Justice 34/3–4: 1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, R.P. (2014) ‘Vanishing Boundaries of Control: Implications for Security and Sovereignty of the Changing Nature and Global Expansion of Neoliberal Criminal Justice Provision.’ in A. Hucklesby and S. Lister (eds) The Private Sector and Criminal Justice. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whatley, W.C. (1993) ‘African-American Strikebreaking from the Civil War to the New Deal.’ Social Science History 17/4: 525–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, A. (2003) ‘Harry Bennett: Henry Ford’s Chief Thug Targets UAW, Later Threatens Family Peace.’ Automotive News 16 June 2006.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Robert P. Weiss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Winnipeg, Canada

    Kevin Walby (Assistant Professor) (Assistant Professor)

  2. University of Windsor, Canada

    Randy K. Lippert (Professor) (Professor)

Copyright information

© 2014 Robert P. Weiss

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Weiss, R.P. (2014). Corporate Security at Ford Motor Company: From the Great War to the Cold War. In: Walby, K., Lippert, R.K. (eds) Corporate Security in the 21st Century. Crime Prevention and Security Management. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137346070_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation