Skip to main content

Abstract

Gender and sexuality invoke a wide spectrum of topics which attract the interest of both the media and academia, but the impact of our gender and sexuality is also an everyday presence for many of us. One example of this is outlined in Liz Peel’s (2001) work on what she refers to as “mundane heterosexism”. Peel’s argument is that overt forms of sexism are easy to challenge due to their easily identifiable quality, whereas more subtle forms of heterosexism are not as easy to address. Peel (2001) makes the point that in the Western social context heterosexist views are normative yet still impact on the lives of those who do not ‘fit’ into the norm, but responding to such sexism is difficult due to its pervasive presence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Further reading

  • Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners.London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonester, M. A. (2010). Doing qualitative research in psychology: A practical guide.London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, A. & Coy le, A. (Eds.) (2007). Analysing qualitative data in psychology.London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (2005). Doing qualitative research: A practical guide.London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willig, C. (2005). Introducing qualitative research in psychology: Adventures in theory and method.Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

References

  • Allen, L. (2010). Queer(y)ing the straight researcher: The relationship between researcher identity and anti-normative knowledge. Feminism & Psychology, 20, 147–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, M. & Langdridge, D. (2008). Bisexuality: Working with a silenced sexuality. Feminism Sc Psychology, 18(3), 389–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, M., Yockney J., Richards, C., Jones, R., Bowes-Catton, H., & Plowman, T. (2012). Guidelines for researching and writing about bisexuality. Journal of Bisexuality, 22(3), 376–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners.London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1987). Life as narrative. Social Research, 54(1), 109–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis.London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, V., Ellis, S. J., Peel, E., & Riggs, D. (2010). Lesbian, gay bisexual, trans and queer psychology: An introduction.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, V. & Peel, E. (2004). The social construction of lesbianism: A reappraisal. Feminism Sc Psychology, 14(4), 485–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cormell, R. (1987). Gender and power.Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, M. L. (2000). Introducing narrative psychology: Self, trauma and the construction of meaning.Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology.London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flowers, P., McGreggor, D., Larkin, M., Church, S., & Marriott, C. (2011). Understanding the impact of HIV diagnosis amongst gay men in Scotland: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Psychology Sc Health, 26(10), 1378–1391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1978 [1976]). The history of sexuality: Volume 1: An introduction(trans. R. Hurley). London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, A. (1995). The wounded storyteller: Body, illness and ethics.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gavey, N. (2005). Just sex? The cultural scaffolding of rape.London and New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K.J. (1999). An invitation to social constructionism.London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Health Prevention Agency (2010). Retrieved from http://www.hpa.org.uk/web/HPA webFile/HPAweb_C/123 7970242135.

  • Health Protection Agency (2010). Retrieved from http://www.hpa.org.uk/web/HPAwebFile/HPAweb_C/12379 70242135.

  • Jarviluoma, H., Moisala, P., & Vilko, A. (2003). Gender and qualitative methods.London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1948). Sexual behaviour in the human male.Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., Martin, C. E., & Gebherd, P. H. (1953). Sexual behaviour in the human female.Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitzinger, C. (1987). The social construction of lesbianism.London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitzinger, C. & Frith, H. (1999). Just say no? The use of conversation analysis in developing a feminist perspective on sexual refusal. Discourse & Society, 10, 293–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kong, S. K., Mahoney, D., & Plummer, K. (2003). Queering the interview. In J. A. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.) Inside interviewing: New lenses, new concerns.(pp. 91–110). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labov, W. (1982). Speech actions and reactions in personal narrative. In D. Tannen (Ed.) Analysing talk and text.(pp. 219–247). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, M. A. (2008). Gender and online cancer support groups: Issues facing male cancer patients. Journal of Cancer Education, 23, 167–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linde, C. (1993). The creation of coherence.Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, M. (2008). Narrative psychology. In J. Smith (Ed.) Qualitative psychology. A practical guide to research methods, (pp. 111–131). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Byrne, R., Rapley M., & Hansen, S. (2006). “You couldn’t say ‘no’, could you?”: Young men’s understanding of sexual refusal. Feminism & Psychology, 16, 133–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Byrne, R., Hansen, S., & Rapley, M. (2008). “If a girl doesn’t say ‘no’...”. Young men, rape and claims of’insufficient knowledge’. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 18, 168–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peel, E. (2001). Mundane heterosexism: Understanding incidents of the everyday. Women’s Studies International Forum, 24(5), 541–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J. & Hepburn, A. (2005). Qualitative interviews in psychology: Problems and possibilities. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2, 281–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J. & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour.London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J. & Wiggins, S. (2007). Discursive psychology. In C. Willig & W. Stainton-Rogers (Eds.) The Sage handbook of qualitative research.London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, C., Barker, M., Lenihan, P., & Iantaffi, H. (2014). Who watches the watchman? A critical perspective on the theorization of trans people and clinicians. Feminism& Psychology, 24, 248–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riessman, C. K. (1993). Narrative analysis.London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringrose, J. & Reynold, E. (2012). Slut-shaming, girl power and’ sexualisation’: Thinking through the politics of the international Slut Walk with teen girls. Gender & Education, 24(2), 333–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochlin, M. (1972). Heterosexual questionnaire.The Gender and Sexuality Centre. Retrieved from https://www.utexas.edu/diversity/ddce/gsc/downloads/resources/Heterosexual_Questionnaire.pdf.

  • Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation(Vol. 1 & 2). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour-Smith, S. (2013). A reconsideration of the gendered mechanisms of support in online interactions about testicular implants: A discursive approach. Health Psychology, 32(1), 91–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, L., Butler, C., Langdridge, D., Gibson, S., Barker, M., Lenihan, P., Nair, R., & Richards, C. (2012). Guidelines for psychologists working therapeutically with sexual and gender minority clients.Leicester: British Psychological Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, R. (2010). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In M. Fonester (Ed.) Doing qualitative research in psychology: A practical guide, (pp. 39–55). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidnell, J. & Stivers, T. (2012). The handbook of conversation analysis.Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. & Sparkes, A. C. (2008). Changing bodies, changing narratives and the consequences of tellability: A case study of becoming disabled through sport. Sociology of Health& Illness, 30(2), 217–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. & Eatough, V. (2007). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In E. Lyons, & A. Coyle (Eds.) Analysing qualitative data in psychology, (pp. 35–50). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research.London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speer, S. (2011). On the role of reported, third party, compliments in passing as a ‘real’ woman. In S. Speer & L. Stokoe (Eds.) Gender and conversation.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 155–182.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Speer, S. & Stokoe, L. (Eds.) (2001). Gender and conversation.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannen, D. (1992). You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation.London: Virago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, D. P. (2003). Methodological issues in conducting community-based health and social service research among urban black and African American LBGT populations. In W. Mezzan &J. I. Martin (Eds.) Research methods with gay lesbian, bisexual and transgender populations, (pp. 65–78). New York, NY: Harrington Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M. & Epston, D. (1990). Narrative means to therapeutic ends.London: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, S. & Riley, S. (2010). Discourse analysis. InM. A. Forrester (Ed.) Doing qualitative research in psychology: A practical guide, (pp. 135–153). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, S. & Kitzinger, C. (1996). Representing the Other: A feminist and psychology reader.London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willig, C. (2005). Introducing qualitative research in psychology: Adventures in theory and method.Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Sarah Seymour-Smith

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Seymour-Smith, S. (2015). Qualitative Methods. In: Richards, C., Barker, M.J. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of the Psychology of Sexuality and Gender. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137345899_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics