International Corporate Governance



In Chapter 2, we discussed corporate governance in theory and in practice in the United States. In essence, the shareholder approach is utilized in most corporate settings, that is, the belief in most boardrooms that the major, if not exclusive, duty of a corporation is to maximize the profits for its shareholders. We have seen that the theory is undergoing fundamental changes due to recent legislative enactments, especially the Dodd-Frank Act, and the rise in influence of large institutional investors. In this chapter, we will review types of stakeholder models that are applied in non-U.S. corporate settings.


Corporate Social Responsibility Corporate Governance Audit Committee Business Enterprise Supervisory Board 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alexander Kern, UK Corporate Governance and Banking Regulation: The Regulator’s Role as Stakeholder, 33 STETSON L.R. 991 (Spring, 2004).Google Scholar
  2. Alison Dabbs Garrett, Themes and Variations: The Convergence of Corporate Governance Practices in Major World Markets, 32 DENV. J. INT’L& POL’Y 147 (Spring, 2004).Google Scholar
  3. Amir Licht, Legal Plug-Ins: Cultural Distance, Cross-Listing, and Corporate Governance Reform, 22 BERKLEY J. INT’S L. 195 (2004).Google Scholar
  4. Amir Licht, The Maximands of Corporate Governance: A Theory of Values and Cognitive Style, 29 DEL. J. CORP. L. 649 (2004).Google Scholar
  5. Anupama J. Naidu, Was its Bite Worse Than its Bark? The Costs Sarbanes-Oxley Imposes on German Issuers May Translate into Costs to the United States, 18 EMORY INT’L L. REV. 271 (Spring, 2004).Google Scholar
  6. Bob Garrett, Thin on Top: Why Corporate Governance Matters and How to Measure and Improve Board Performance (London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing, 2003).Google Scholar
  7. Brian R. Cheffins, Current Trends in Corporate Governance: Going from London to Milan via Toronto, 10 DUKE J. of COMP. & INT’L L. 5 (2005).Google Scholar
  8. Chee Keong Low, A Road Map for Corporate Governance in Asia, 25 NW J. INT’L & BUS. 165 (Fall, 2004).Google Scholar
  9. Convergence and Persistence in Corporate Governance (Jeffrey N. Gordon & Mark J. Roed eds, Cambridge University Press 2004).Google Scholar
  10. Coro Strandberg, The Convergence of Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility (March, 2005), Scholar
  11. Joseph A, McChery, Piet Moerland, Theo Raaijmakers & Luc Renneboog, eds., 52 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE LAW No. 3, 770–776 (Summer 2004).Google Scholar
  12. Cynthia A. Williams & John M. Conley, An Emerging Third Way? The Erosion of the Anglo-American Shareholder Value Construct, 38 CORNELL INT’L L.J. 493 (2005).Google Scholar
  13. Daniel T. Ostas & T. Daniel, Cooperate, Comply, or Evade? A Corporate Executive’s Social Responsibilities with Regard to Law, 41 AM. BUS. L.J. 559 (Summer, 2004).Google Scholar
  14. Davis, Gerald F. & Christopher Marquis, The Globalization of Stock Markets and Convergence in Corporate Governance, in Economic Sociology of Capitalism (Victor Nee & Richard Swedberg eds., 2004), Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Diane K. Denis & John J. Mcconnell, International Corporate Governance (November 2002),…Google Scholar
  16. Edward S. Adams, Corporate Governance after Enron and Global Crossing: Comparative Lessons for Cross-National Improvement, 78 IND. L.J. 723 (Summer, 2003).Google Scholar
  17. Felicia H. Kung, The Regulation of Corporate Bond Offerings: A Comparative Analysis, 26 U. PA. INT’L ECON. L. 409 (Fall, 2005).Google Scholar
  18. Florian Stamm, A Comparative Study of Monitoring of Management in German and U.S. Corporations after Sarbanes-Oxley: Where are the German Enrons, WorldComs, and Tycos, 32 GA J. INT’L & COMP. 813 (Summer, 2004).Google Scholar
  19. Fred R. Kaen, A Blueprint for Corporate Governance: Strategy, Accountability, and the Preservation of Shareholder Value, American Management Association (2003).Google Scholar
  20. Goswami Omkar, The Tide Rises, Gradually: Corporate Governance In India, OECD Development Centre (2000). Harvard Business Review on Corporate Governance, Harvard Business School Press (2000).Google Scholar
  21. Howard Fisher, Making a Case for Outside Boards of Directors, Scholar
  22. Ira M. Millstein, Corporate Governance and Global Markets: The OECD Business Sector Advisory Group Report, THE METROPOLITAN CORPORATE COUNSEL (June, 1998).Google Scholar
  23. Jay Dahya & John J. McConnell, The Cadbury Committee, Corporate Performance and Top Management Turnover, 57 THE JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 461–483 (February 2002).Google Scholar
  24. John Colley, Jacqueline Doyle, Wallace Stettinius & George Logan, CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, McGraw Hill Executive MBA Series (McGraw Hill, 2003).Google Scholar
  25. Magdi R. Iskander & Nedereh Chamlou, Corporate Governance: A Framework for Implementation (The World Bank Group, 1999).Google Scholar
  26. Max B.E. Clarkson, A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance, 20 ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 92–117 (1995).Google Scholar
  27. Roberta S. Karmel, Reform of Public Company Disclosure in Europe, 26 U. PA. J. INT’L ECON. L. 379 (Fall, 2005).Google Scholar
  28. Roberta S. Karmel, The Securities and Exchange Commission Goes Abroad to Regulate Corporate Governance, 33 STETSON L. REV. 849 (Spring, 2004).Google Scholar
  29. Ronald J. Gilson, The Globalization of Corporate Governance: Convergence of Form or Function (Columbia Law School, Working Paper, May, 2000), Scholar
  30. Sanford M. Jacoby, Corporate Governance in Comparative Perspective: Prospects for Convergence, Symposium on Employees and Corporate Governance (October, 2001).Google Scholar
  31. Sean D. Murphy, Essay in Honor of Oscar Schachter: Taking Multinational Corporate Codes of Conduct to the Next Level, 43 COLUM J. TRANSNAT’L L. 389 (2005).Google Scholar
  32. Sibao Shen, Sibao & Jing Jia, Will the Independent Director Institution Work in China?, 27 LOY. LA. INT’L & COMP. L REV. 223 (Spring, 2005).Google Scholar
  33. Sorcha MacLeod, Corporate Responsibility within the European Union Framework, 23 WIS. INT’L L.J. 541 (Summer, 2005).Google Scholar
  34. Stijn Claessens, Djankov Simeon & Larry LLP. Lang, The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asian Corporations,…+and+Control+in+East+Asia.pdf.
  35. Timothy L. Fort, Timothy L. & Cindy A. Schipani, Competitive Corporations with Moral Integrity: A Blended Model of Corporate Governance, 1 ALSB INT’L BUSs. L.J. 62 (2000).Google Scholar
  36. Ugeux, Towards Global Convergence in Corporate Governance: An Assessment of the Current Situation, 1 INT’L J. OF DISCLOSURE AND GOVERNANCE 339, No. 4 (2004).Google Scholar
  37. Varma Jayanth Rama, Corporate Governance in India: Disciplining the Dominant Shareholder, IIMB MANAGEMENT REVIEW (October-December 1997, 9(4), 5–18),
  38. Many websites contain codes and other very pertinent dataGoogle Scholar
  39. African Management Services Company—
  40. AMED Director Development Network— Corporate Watch—
  41. European Corporate Governance Links——contains the international codes and principles and individual countries codes and principles including the U.S.,Asia-Pacific, South Africa, European, and many other codes.
  42. The First Principles of Corporate Governance for Public Enterprises in India,
  43. Global Corporate Governance Forum—
  44. Global Watch—
  45. Institute of Directors, London—
  46. International Corporate Governance Network—
  47. OECD Corporate Governance Principles—
  48. Transparency International——contains a listing of the least to the most corrupt countries worldwide in descending order.
  49. U.S. Corporate Governance Links—
  50. U.S. Corporate Governance Principles,

Copyright information

© Roy Girasa 2013

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations