Skip to main content

Land Tenure Reforms, Land Market Participation and the Farm Size — Productivity Relationship in Uganda

  • Chapter

Abstract

Historical circumstances and colonial policies in Uganda are well known to have created land tenure insecurity and other unintended consequences, including establishment of the overlapping land ownership rights, conflicts on land, poor land management, and skewed land distribution (Rugadya, 1999; Coldham, 2000; Deininger, 2003, 2005; Green, 2006; Deininger and Ayalew, 2007; Ahene, 2009). Customary land is estimated to comprise at least 75 percent of land in Uganda (Busingye, 2002) and was for a long time not legally recognized (Bosworth, 2003; Hunt, 2004). It was administered based on traditional institutional arrangements that discouraged the functioning of land rental and sales markets, while focusing on preserving the cultural identity of different lineage groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ahene, A.R. (2009) Measures to Improve Equal Access to Land Resources and Related Benefits in Uganda, Proceedings: Land Governance in Support of the MDGs: Responding to New Challenges, RIG-World Bank Conference, Washington, DC, USA, 9–10 March 2009, International Federation of Surveyors, FIG and the World Bank, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, C.B., Bellemare, M. and Hou, J.Y. (2010) ‘Reconsidering Conventional Explanations of the Inverse Productivity-Size Relationship’, World Development, 38(1), 88–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, D. (1995) ‘Can Unobserved Land Quality Explain The Inverse Productivity Relationship?’ Journal of Development Economics, 46, 51–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhalla, S.S. and Roy, P. (1988) ‘Mis-Specification in Farm Productivity Analysis: The Role of Land Quality’, Oxford Economic Papers, 40, 55–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binswanger, H.P., Deininger, K. and Feder, G. (1995) ‘Power, Distortions Revolt and Reform in Agricultural Land Relations’, inj. Berhman and T.N. Srinivasan (eds), Handbook of Development Economics, Vol. HIB, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp.2659-772.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binswanger, H.P. and Rosenzweig, M. (1986) ‘Behavioural and Material Determinants of Production Relations in Agriculture’, Journal of Development Studies, 22, 503–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, J. (2003) ‘Integrating Land issues into the Broader Development Agenda: Uganda’, Land Reform, Land Settlement, and Cooperatives — Special Edition, 11, 233–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brett, E.A. (1973) Colonialism and Underdevelopment in East Africa: The Politics of Economic Change (London: Heinemann). Available at: http://www.getcited.org/pub/101453454.

  • Busingye, H. (2002) Customary Land Tenure Reform in Uganda: Lessons for South Africa. International symposium on communal tenure reform, Land reform in Africa: lessons for South Africa, Johannesburg, 12–13 August 2002, pp. 1–12: Uganda Land Alliance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carletto, C, Savastano, S. and Zezza, A. (2011) ‘Fact or Artefact: The Impact of Measurement Enors on the Farm Size-Productivity Relationship’, Policy Research Working Paper No. 5908, The World Bank, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coldham, S. (2000) ‘Land Reform and Customary Rights: The Case of Uganda’, Journal of African Law, 44, 65–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, A. (1997) The Analysis of Household Surveys: A Microeconometric Approach to Development Policy (Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deininger, K. (2003) ‘Land Policies for Growth and Poverty Reduction’, A World Bank Policy Research Report 26384, a copublication of the World Bank and Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deininger, K. (2005) ‘Land Policy Reforms’, in A. Coudouel and S. Paternostro (eds), Analyzing the Distributional Impact of Reforms: A Practitioner’s Guide to Trade, Monetary and Exchange Rate Policy, Utility Provision, Agricultural Markets, Land Policy, and Education, Vol. 1 (Washington D.C: The World Bank).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deininger, K. and Ayalew, A.D. (2007) ‘Do Overlapping Land Rights Reduce Agricultural Investment? Evidence from Uganda’, Policy Research Working Paper 4310, The World Bank Development Research Group and the Sustainable Rural and Urban Development Team.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deininger, K. and Feder, G. (1998) ‘Land Institutions and Land Markets’, Policy Research Working Paper 2014, prepared as background for the forthcoming Handbook on Agricultural Economics, 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deininger, K. and Mpuga, P. (2008) ‘Land Markets in Uganda: What is Their Impact and Who Benefits?’ In TS. Holden, K. Otsuka and M.F. Place (eds), The Emergence of Land Markets in Africa: Impacts on Poverty, Equity and Efficiency (Washington, DC: Resources for the Future)

    Google Scholar 

  • de Janvry A., Platteau, J.-P., Gordillo, G. and Sadoulet, E. (2001) ‘Access to Land and Land Policy Reforms’, in A. de Janvry, G. Gordillo., J.-P. Platteau and S. Elizabeth (eds), Access to Land, Rural Poverty and Public Action (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Finan, F, Sadoulet, E. and de Janvry, A. (2005) ‘Measuring the Poverty Reduction Potential of Land in Rural Mexico’, Journal of Development Economics, 77(1), 27–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, D.E. (2006) ‘Ethnicity and the Politics of Land Tenure Reform in Central Uganda’, Commonwealth ana Comparative Politics, 44, 370–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heltberg, R. (1998) ‘Rural Market Imperfections and the Farm Size-Productivity Relationship: Evidence from Pakistan’, World Development, 26(10), 1807–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden, S.T. (2009) ‘Power Traps or Poverty Traps? Institutions, Markets, and Environmental and Livelihood Restoration’, Paper presented at the NFU Conference, 23–24 November 2009, University of Agder, Kristiansand, pp. 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holden, S.T., Otsuka, K. and Place, M.F. (2008a) ‘Land Markets and Development in Africa’, in TS. Holden, K. Otsuka and M.F. Place (eds), The Emergency of Land Markets in Africa (Washington, DC: Resources for the Future).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holden, S.T., Otsuka, K. and Place, M.F. (2008b) ‘Land markets and Poverty in Perspective’, in TS. Holden, K. Otsuka and M.F. Place (eds), The Emergence of Land Markets in Africa: Assessing the Impacts on Poverty, Equity and Efficiency (Washington, DC: Resources for the Future).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, D. (2004) ‘Unintended Consequences of Land Rights Reform: The Case of the 1998 Uganda Land Act’, Development Policy Review, 22(2), 173–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, R.L. (2003) ‘Inverse Productivity: Land Quality, Labor Markets, and Measurement Error’, Journal of Development Economics, 71, 71–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otsuka, K. (2007) ‘Efficiency and Equity Effects of Land Markets’, in R. Evenson and P. Pingali (eds), Handbook of Agricultural Economics, 3, 2671–703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugadya, A.M., Nsamba-Gayiiya, E. and Kamusiime, H. (2008) ‘Analysis of Post Conflict Land Policy and Land Administration: A Survey of IDP Return and Resettlement Issues and Lesson: Acholi and Lango Regions’, in Northern Uganda Land Study, for the World Bank to input into Northern Uganda Peace, Recovery and Development Plan (PRDP) and the draft national land policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugadya, M. (1999) ‘Land Reform: The Ugandan Experience’, paper presented at Land Use and Villagisation Workshop, Hotel De Mille Collines, Kigali, Uganda, 20–21 September 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugadya, M., Obaikol, E. and Kamusiime, H. (2004) ‘Gender and the Land Reform Process in Uganda: Assessing Gains and Losses for Women in Uganda’, Associates for development: Land Research Series No. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, T.S. and Ryan, J.G. (1990) Village and Household Economies in India’s Semiarid Tropics (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • West, H.W. (1972) Land policy in Buganda (London: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Alex Tatwangire and Stein T. Holden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tatwangire, A., Holden, S.T. (2013). Land Tenure Reforms, Land Market Participation and the Farm Size — Productivity Relationship in Uganda. In: Holden, S.T., Otsuka, K., Deininger, K. (eds) Land Tenure Reform in Asia and Africa. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137343819_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics