Abstract
The caste system is an inherent part of Nepal’s institutional structure, as are class formation, political instability and conflict. The group the caste system discriminates against the most forcefully is the Dalit, the so-called ‘untouchables’. Dalits have for many centuries faced religious, occupational and even territorial discrimination; they were traditionally excluded from receiving education and using public resources, and had no rights to own land (Dahal, 1995; CHRGJ, 2005; Haug et al., 2009). The situation of the Dalits in Nepal, especially before 1951, can best be explained by a patron-client dependency in which landed patrons (high-caste households) provided the Dalits with access to small pieces of land and other basic requirements for subsistence living — and in return for that, they were bound to provide their services to their patron; in essence, a feudal system. Although caste discrimination is outlawed now, it still has impacts on their lives, because it restricts their access to economic resources; as a result, nearly 75 per cent of Dalits in Nepal are functionally landless (Wily et al., 2008). Traditional religious justification combined with poverty and landlessness contribute substantially to the social ostracism of the Dalits (Banerjee and Knight, 1985).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Acharya, R.N. and Ekelund, J.R.B. (1998) ‘Mixed and Pure Sharecropping in Nepal: Empirical Evidence Supporting the Traditional Hypothesis’, Applied Economics, 30, 37–50.
Aryal, J.P. (2011) ‘Caste Discrimination, Land Tenure, and Natural Resource Management in Nepal’, Department of Economics and Resource Management. Norwegian University of Life Sciences, As.
Aryal, J.P. and Holden, S.T. (2009) ‘Caste and Land Productivity in Rural Nepal’, Nordic Conference in Development Economics, 18–19 June 2009, Oscarberg, Norway.
Aryal, J.P. and Holden, S.T. (2010) ‘Caste, Marshallian Inefficiency, and the Farm Size-Productivity Relationship’, Department of Economics and Resource Management. Norwegian University of Life Sciences, As.
AryalJ.P. and Holden, S.T. (201a) ‘Caste, Investment and Intensity of Production’, 18th Annual Conference of the European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists (EAERE), 29 June-2 July 2011, Rome, Italy.
Aryal, J.P. and Holden, S.T. (2011b) ‘Caste, Land and Labor Market Imperfections, and Land Productivity in Rural Nepal’, Department of Economics and Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, As, Norway.
Banerjee, B. and Knight, J.B. (1985) ‘Caste discrimination in the Indian Urban Labour Market’, Journal of Development Economics, 17(3), 277–307.
Bhandari, R. (2006) ‘Searching for a Weapon of Mass Production: The Case of Market-Assisted Land Reforms in Nepal’, International Conference on ‘Land, Poverty, Social Justice and Development’, 9–14 January 2006. Institute of Social Studies (ISS), The Hague, The Netherlands.
Bhandari, R. (2007) ‘The Role of Social Distance in Sharecropping Efficiency: The Case of Two Rice-Growing Villages in Nepal’, Journal of Economic Studies, 34(4), 290–310.
CHRGJ (2005) ‘The Missing Piece of Puzzle: Caste Discrimination and the Conflict of Nepal’, Center for Human Rights and Global Justice.
CSRC (2007) ‘Reflections: Land Rights Movements in Nepal’, Community Self-Reliance Centre (CSRC), Kathmandu.
Dahal, D.R. (1995) ‘Ethnic Couldron, Demography and Minority Politics: The Case of Nepal’, in D. Kumar (ed.), States, Leadership and Politics of Nepal (Centre for Nepal and Asian Studies (CNAS), Kathmandu).
Deininger, K. and Jin, S. (2005) ‘The Potential of Land Rental Markets in the Process of Economic Development: Evidence from China’, Journal of Development Economics, 78, 241–70.
Deininger, K., Jin, S. and Nagarajan, H.K. (2008) ‘Efficiency and Equity Impacts of Rural Land Rental Restrictions: Evidence from India’, European Economic Review, 52, 892–918.
Deininger, K. Jin, S. and Nagarajan, H.K. (2009) ‘Determinants and Consequences of Land Sales Market Participation: Panel Evidence from India’, World Development, 37(2), 410–21.
DFID, World Bank (2006) ‘Unequal Citizens: Gender, Caste and Ethnic Exclusion in Nepal’, Department for International Development (DFID) and The World Bank (WB), Kathmandu.
Hatlebakk, M. (2007) ‘Economic and Social Structures That May Explain the Recent Conflicts in the Terai of Nepal’, CMI, Bergen, Norway.
Hatlebakk, M. (2008) ‘Inclusive Growth in Nepal’, CMI, Bergen, Norway.
Haug, M., Aasland, A. and Dahal, D.R. (2009) ‘Patterns of Socio-Political Participation in Nepal and Implications for Social Inclusion’, The Nordic Journal of Development Research, 36(1), 105–36.
Holden, S.T., Otsuka, K. and Place, RM. (eds) (2008) The Emergence of Land Markets in Africa: Assessing the Impacts on Poverty, Equity, ana Efficiency (Washington D.C.: Resources for the Future (RFR)).
IDS (1986) ‘Study on Land Tenure System of Nepal’, Integrated Development Systems (IDS), Kathmandu.
Jin, S. and Deininger, K. (2009) ‘Land Rental Markets in the Process of Rural Structural Transformation: Productivity and Equity Impacts from China’, Journal of Comparative Economics, 37(4), 629–46.
Jolly, J. (2009) ‘Growing Fragility of Nepal’s Peace Process’, BBC News. British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC), News, Kathmandu.
Joshi, M. and Mason, T.D. (2008) ‘Between Democracy and Revolution: Peasant Support or Insurgency versus Democracy in Nepal’, Journal of Peace Research, 45(6), 765–82.
Kühnen, F. (1971) ‘Land Tenure and Agrarian Reform in Asia: A Re-appraisal of Priorities in Agrarian Re-organization for Rural Development’, Asian Regional Seminar on the Contribution of Rural Institutions to Rural Development, Particularly Employment, 3–16 November 1971. International Labor Organization, New Delhi, pp. 162–182.
Kung, J.K.S. (2002) ‘Off-farm Labor Markets and the Emergence of Land Rental Markets in Rural China’, Journal of Comparative Economics, 30(2), 395–414.
Land Watch Asia (2009) ‘tAsserting Freedom from Central Control: Nepal Country Paper’, Land Watch Asia.
Murshed, S.M. and Gates, S. (2005) ‘Spatial-Horizontal Inequality and the Maoist Insurgency in Nepal’, Review of Development Economics, 9, 121–34.
Otsuka, K. (2007) ‘Efficiency and Equity Effects of Land Markets’, in R. Evenson and P. Pingali (eds), Handbook of Agricultural Economics (Amsterdam: Elsevier).
Otsuka, K., Chuma, H. and Hayami, Y. (1992) ‘Land and Labor Contracts in Agrarian Economies: Theories and Facts’, Journal of Economic Literature, 30(4), 1965–2018.
Pandey, T.R. (1993) ‘The Failure of Confidence Mechanism: Reflections on the 1990’s Social Change Movement in the Light of Policy Measures Affecting Farming System in Nepal’, Occasional Papers in Sociology and Anthropology, 3, 96–127.
Regmi, M.C. (1976) Landowner ship in Nepal (Berkeley: University of California Press).
Tiejun, W. and Kinchi, L. (2008) ‘Land Reform and National Development in Nepal’, Land Research Action Network.
UNDP (2008) ‘The Dalits of Nepal and a New Constitution. A Resource on the Situation of Dalits in Nepal, Their Demands and the Implications for a New Constitution’, United Nations Development Programme, Kathmandu.
Wily, L.A., Chapagain, D. and Sharma, S. (2008) ‘Land Reform in Nepal: Where Is It Coming from and Where Is It Going?’ DFID Nepal.
World Bank (2003) ‘Land Policies for Growth and Poverty Reduction’, A World Bank Policy Research Report. The World Bank and Oxford University Press.
Yadav, R.P. (1999) ‘Land Tenure Situation in Nepal’, HMG Ministry of Agriculture/ Winrock International Kathmandu, Nepal.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Jeetendra P. Aryal and Stein T. Holden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Aryal roresearcher, J.P., Holden, S.T. (2013). Land Reforms, Caste Discrimination and Land Market Performance in Nepal. In: Holden, S.T., Otsuka, K., Deininger, K. (eds) Land Tenure Reform in Asia and Africa. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137343819_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137343819_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-46586-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-34381-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)