Abstract
Are there wrongs for which states cannot apologise? In this chapter, I argue that the answer is βYesβ. I begin with the simple observation that reasoning as a state official requires a conception of what officials do, and so a conception of what is β and is not β properly undertaken on behalf of the state. To act as an official, then, requires a theory of what happens in a well functioning state: it requires a normative theory of the state. Whether state officials can recognise their own actions or the actions of past state officials as wrongs for which apology is required will depend on their theory of the ends and interests that state actors may, and must, have. What officials believe to be necessary for a state to be a good example of its kind will affect what they recognise as outside the bounds of what a state official ought to do.
The author thanks Mihaela Mihai, Mathias Thaler, Alice MacLachlan and Matt James for insights and comments on earlier drafts of this chapter.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
On this, see Jean Hampton, βRethinking Reasonβ, American Philosophical Quarterly 29, no. 3 (1992): 219β236;
Jean Hampton, The Authority of Reason (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998);
Christine Korsgaard, βThe Normativity of Instrumental Reasonβ, in Ethics and Practical Reason, ed. Garrett Cullity and Berys Nigel Gaut (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997), 215β254;
Christine Korsgaard, The Constitution of Agency: Essays on Practical Reason and Moral Psychology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).
Jean Hampton, βHobbes and Ethical Naturalismβ, Philosophical Perspectives 6 (1992): 343; Hampton, βRethinking Reasonβ.
For a discussion of this in the context of debates about public reason see Cindy Holder, βRethinking Political Justificationβ, Journal of Value Inquiry 38 (2004): 511β529.
On this see Dennis Thompson, Political Ethics and Public Office (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1987);
Andrew Sabl, Ruling Passions: Political Offices and Democratic Ethics, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009).
Jennifer J. Llewellyn, βDealing with the Legacy of Native Residential School Abuse in Canada: Litigation, ADR, and Restorative Justiceβ, The University of Toronto Law Journal 52, no. 3 (2002): 253β300.
Zia Akhtar, βCanadian Genocide and Official Culpabilityβ, International Criminal Law Review 10 (2010): 115.
Bradford Morse, βGovernment Responses to the Residential Schools Settlement in Canada: Implications for Australiaβ, Australian Indigenous Law Review 12, no. 1 (2008): 44.
See, for example, James Matt, βWrestling with the Past: Apologies, Quasi-Apologies, and Non-Apologies in Canadaβ, in The Age of Apology: Facing Up to the Past, ed. Mark Gibney et al., Pennsylvania Studies in Human Rights (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008), 137β153;
Jeff Corntassel, Chaw-win-is, and Tβlakwadzi, βIndigenous Storytelling, Truth-telling, and Community Approaches to Reconciliationβ, ESC: English Studies in Canada 35, no. 1 (2009): 137β159;
Matthew Dorrell, βFrom Reconciliation to Reconciling: Reading What βWe Now Recognizeβ in the Government of Canadaβs 2008 Residential Schools Apologyβ, ESC: English Studies in Canada 35, no. 1 (2009): 27β45.
First Nations Child and Family Caring Society, βHuman Rights Complaintβ submitted to Canadian Human Rights Commission 23 February 2007, accessed 28 June 2013 http://www.fncaringsociety.com/i-am-witness; Jennifer Henderson and Pauline Wakeham, βColonial Reckoning, National Reconciliation?: Aboriginal Peoples and the Culture of Redress in Canadaβ, ESC: English Studies in Canada 35, no. 1 (2009): 1β26, Committee on the Rights of the Child. βConsideration of Reports Submitted by States Parties under Article 44 of the Convention. Concluding Observations: Canada.β U.N. Doc CRC/C/CAN/CO/3β4, 5 October 2012, p. 7.
First Nations Child and Family Caring Society, βHuman Rights Complaintβ, Cindy Blackstock, βThe Canadian Human Rights Tribunal on First Nations Child Welfare: Why If Canada Wins, Equality and Justice Loseβ, Children and Youth Services Review 33, no. 1 (2011): 187β194; Committee on the Rights of the Child, βConsideration of reportsβ, 7.
Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples, Report of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal People, Vol. 1: Looking Forward, Looking Back (Ottawa: Canada Communication Group, 1996).
David Miller, On Nationality (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995).
Will Kymlicka, Multicultural Citizenship (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995) and Politics in the Vernacular: Nationalism, Multiculturalism, and Citizenship (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), 49β66, 311β316.
Thomas Christiano, The Constitution of Equality (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), 78β79.
Elizabeth Anderson, The Imperative of Integration (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2011), 94, 97.
Will Kymlicka, βWestern Political Theory and Ethnic Relations in Eastern Europeβ, in Can Liberal Pluralism Be Exported? Western Political Theory and Ethnic Relations in Eastern Europe, ed. Will Kymlicka and Magdalena Opalski (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001), 13β105, and Multicultural Odysseys (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).
Eva Mackey, The House of Difference: Cultural Politics and National Identity in Canada (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1999.)
On this, see Jane Jenson and Susan D. Philips, βRedesigning the Canadian Citizenship Regime: Remaking the Institutions of Representationβ, in Citizenship, Markets, and the State, ed. Colin Crouch, Klaus Eder, and Damian Tambini (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), 69β89;
Reeva Joshee, βCitizenship and Multicultural Education in Canada: From Assimilation to Social Cohesionβ, in Diversity and Citizenship Education: Global Perspectives, ed. James A. Banks (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2004), 127β156;
Reeva Joshee and Lori Johnson, βMulticultural Education in the United States and Canada: The Importance of National Politicsβ, in International Handbook of Educational Policy, ed. Nina Bascia et al. (Dordrecht: Springer, 2005), 53β74;
Sunera Thobani, Exalted Subjects: Studies in the Making of Race and Nation in Canada (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2007); Maryam Nabavi, βConstructing the βCitizenβ in Citizenship Educationβ, Canadian Journal for New Scholars in Education/ Revue Canadienne Des Jeunes Chercheures et Chercheurs En Γducation 3, no. 1 (2010), http://www.cjnse-rcjce.ca/ojs2/index.php/cjnse/article/view/135.
Andrew Hughes and Alana Sears, βThe Struggle for Citizenship Education in Canada: The Centre Cannot Holdβ, in The SAGE Handbook of Education for Citizenship and Democracy, ed. James Arthur, Ian Davies, and Carole Hahn (Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, 2008), 127.
Yvonne HΓ©bert and Lori Wilkinson, βThe Citizenship Debates: Conceptual, Policy, Experiential and Educational Issuesβ, in Citizenship in Transformation in Canada, ed. Yvonne HΓ©bert (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2002), 4.
Jennifer Henderson and Pauline Wakeham, βColonial Reckoning, National Reconciliation?: Aboriginal Peoples and the Culture of Redress in Canadaβ, ESC: English Studies in Canada 35, no. 1 (2009): 8.
Tina Loo, βDan Cranmerβs Potlatch: Law as Coercion, Symbol, and Rhetoric in British Columbia, 1884β1951β, Canadian Historical Review 2 (1992): 125β165.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
Β© 2014 Cindy Holder
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Holder, C. (2014). Reasoning Like a State: Integration and the Limits of Official Regret. In: Mihai, M., Thaler, M. (eds) On the Uses and Abuses of Political Apologies. Rhetoric, Politics and Society Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137343727_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137343727_12
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-46582-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-34372-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political Science CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)