Abstract
Nuclear energy and nuclear weapons have been historically connected in Japan and elsewhere. Japan’s nuclear energy program, particularly, its breeder reactor program and used fuel reprocessing, has been directly linked to its national security. This chapter explores how nuclear energy became an important foundation of Japan’s national security and considers the implications given Japan’s earthquake and tsunami activity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See H. J. Morgenthau (1960) “The Four Paradoxes of Nuclear Strategy,” The American Political Science Review, 58.1, 23–35.
D. Elliott (2013) Fukushima: Impacts and Implications (Palgrave Pivot: Houndmills, Basingstoke), p. 66.
P. Bracken (2000) “The Second Nuclear Age,” Foreign Affairs, 79.1, 146–150.
W. Lanouette (1985) “Atomic Energy: 1945–1985,” The Wilson Quarterly, 9.5, 100.
Enrichment processing increases the proportion of uranium-235, which is fissile, to Uranium 238. A. Makhijani and S. Saleska (1999) The Nuclear Power Deception (The Apex Press: New York), p. 219.
Von Hippel “The Rise and Fall of the Plutonium Breeder Reactors,” in T. Cochran, H. Feiveson, W. Patterson, G. Pshakin, M. Ramana, M. Schneider, T. Suzuki, and F. von Hippel (eds) Fast Breeder Reactor Programs: History and Status: A Research Report of the International Panel on Fissile Materials (pp. 1–16), http://fssilematerials.org/library/rr08.pdf, date accessed 17 2012, date accessed 17 July 2012.
H. Caldicott (2006) Nuclear Power Is Not the Answer (The New Press: New York), 124.
S. Valentine and B. Sovacool (2010) “The Socio-Political Economy of Nuclear Power Development in Japan and South Korea,” Energy Politics, 38, 7971–7979, p. 7973.
P. Pringle and J. Spigelman (1981) The Nuclear Barons, 2nd edn (New York: Avon), p. 173.
See H. Funabashi (2012) “Why the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster Is a Man-Made Calamity,” The International Journal of Japanese Sociology, 21, 65–75. Also see Valentine and Sovacool “The Socio-Political Economy,” p. 7974.
T. Suzuki (February 2010) “Japan’s Plutonium Breeder Reactor and Its Fuel Cycle” in T. Cochran, H. Feiveson, W. Patterson, G. Pshakin, M. Ramana, M. Schneider, T. Suzuki, and F. von Hippel (eds) Fast Breeder Reactor Programs: History and Status: A Research Report of the International Panel on Fissile Materials (pp. 53–61), http://fssilematerials.org/library/rr08.pdf, date accessed 17 July 2012
W. Sweet (1988) “Japan’s Nuclear Program Stresses Breeders, Plutonium, and Safeguards,” Physics Today, 41.1, 71–74.
S. Tatsujiro (2010) “Japan’s Plutonium Breeder Reactor and Its Fuel Cycle,” in T. B. Cochran, H. A. Feiveson., W. Patterson, G. Pshakin, M. V. Ramana, M. Schneider, T. Suzuki, F. von Hippel (eds) Fast Breeder Reactor Programs: History and Status: A Research Report of the International Panel on Fissile Materials (pp. 53–61), http://fssilematerials.org/library/rr08.pdf, date accessed 17 July 2012
See S. Carpenter (2012) Japan’s Nuclear Crisis: The Routes to Responsibility (Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 1–223.
J. Takagi and B. Nishio (1990) “Nishio Japan’s Fake Plutonium Shortage,” The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, 46.8, 34–38.
USGS (2012) Fission Products in National Atmospheric Deposition Program-Wet Deposition Samples Prior to and Following the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Incident, March 8–April 5, 2011. Open File Report 2011–1277.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Majia Holmer Nadesan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nadesan, M.H. (2013). Why Nuclear Power. In: Fukushima and the Privatization of Risk. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137343123_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137343123_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-46549-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-34312-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)