Skip to main content
  • 108 Accesses

Abstract

Nuclear energy and nuclear weapons have been historically connected in Japan and elsewhere. Japan’s nuclear energy program, particularly, its breeder reactor program and used fuel reprocessing, has been directly linked to its national security. This chapter explores how nuclear energy became an important foundation of Japan’s national security and considers the implications given Japan’s earthquake and tsunami activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See H. J. Morgenthau (1960) “The Four Paradoxes of Nuclear Strategy,” The American Political Science Review, 58.1, 23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. D. Elliott (2013) Fukushima: Impacts and Implications (Palgrave Pivot: Houndmills, Basingstoke), p. 66.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. Bracken (2000) “The Second Nuclear Age,” Foreign Affairs, 79.1, 146–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. W. Lanouette (1985) “Atomic Energy: 1945–1985,” The Wilson Quarterly, 9.5, 100.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Enrichment processing increases the proportion of uranium-235, which is fissile, to Uranium 238. A. Makhijani and S. Saleska (1999) The Nuclear Power Deception (The Apex Press: New York), p. 219.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Von Hippel “The Rise and Fall of the Plutonium Breeder Reactors,” in T. Cochran, H. Feiveson, W. Patterson, G. Pshakin, M. Ramana, M. Schneider, T. Suzuki, and F. von Hippel (eds) Fast Breeder Reactor Programs: History and Status: A Research Report of the International Panel on Fissile Materials (pp. 1–16), http://fssilematerials.org/library/rr08.pdf, date accessed 17 2012, date accessed 17 July 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  7. H. Caldicott (2006) Nuclear Power Is Not the Answer (The New Press: New York), 124.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. Valentine and B. Sovacool (2010) “The Socio-Political Economy of Nuclear Power Development in Japan and South Korea,” Energy Politics, 38, 7971–7979, p. 7973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. P. Pringle and J. Spigelman (1981) The Nuclear Barons, 2nd edn (New York: Avon), p. 173.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See H. Funabashi (2012) “Why the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster Is a Man-Made Calamity,” The International Journal of Japanese Sociology, 21, 65–75. Also see Valentine and Sovacool “The Socio-Political Economy,” p. 7974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. T. Suzuki (February 2010) “Japan’s Plutonium Breeder Reactor and Its Fuel Cycle” in T. Cochran, H. Feiveson, W. Patterson, G. Pshakin, M. Ramana, M. Schneider, T. Suzuki, and F. von Hippel (eds) Fast Breeder Reactor Programs: History and Status: A Research Report of the International Panel on Fissile Materials (pp. 53–61), http://fssilematerials.org/library/rr08.pdf, date accessed 17 July 2012

    Google Scholar 

  12. W. Sweet (1988) “Japan’s Nuclear Program Stresses Breeders, Plutonium, and Safeguards,” Physics Today, 41.1, 71–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. S. Tatsujiro (2010) “Japan’s Plutonium Breeder Reactor and Its Fuel Cycle,” in T. B. Cochran, H. A. Feiveson., W. Patterson, G. Pshakin, M. V. Ramana, M. Schneider, T. Suzuki, F. von Hippel (eds) Fast Breeder Reactor Programs: History and Status: A Research Report of the International Panel on Fissile Materials (pp. 53–61), http://fssilematerials.org/library/rr08.pdf, date accessed 17 July 2012

    Google Scholar 

  14. See S. Carpenter (2012) Japan’s Nuclear Crisis: The Routes to Responsibility (Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 1–223.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Takagi and B. Nishio (1990) “Nishio Japan’s Fake Plutonium Shortage,” The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, 46.8, 34–38.

    Google Scholar 

  16. USGS (2012) Fission Products in National Atmospheric Deposition Program-Wet Deposition Samples Prior to and Following the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Incident, March 8–April 5, 2011. Open File Report 2011–1277.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2013 Majia Holmer Nadesan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nadesan, M.H. (2013). Why Nuclear Power. In: Fukushima and the Privatization of Risk. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137343123_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics