Skip to main content

Introduction to Fukushima and the Privatization of Risk

  • Chapter
Fukushima and the Privatization of Risk
  • 114 Accesses

Abstract

The public health risks from the Fukushima nuclear disaster will take decades to unfold and will be difficult to measure because of uncertainty about the extent of atmospheric and oceanic emissions and because of the challenges of mapping fallout patterns and bio-accumulation. The effect of uncertainty is that risk is privatized, or shifted away from Japanese industry and government, to impacted individuals in Japan and elsewhere.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. J. S. Hacker (May 2004) ‘Privatizing Risk without Privatizing the Welfare State: The Hidden Politics of Social Policy Retrenchment in the United States’, American Political Science Review, 98, 243–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. N. Klein (2008) The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism (New York: Picador).

    Google Scholar 

  3. See B. Rockhill’s (2001) discussion of these characteristics of privatization processes in “The Privatization of Risk,” American Journal of Public Health, 91, 365–368, p. 365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J. J. Lafont (10 December 2012) “Externalities,” in S. Durlauf and L. Blume (eds) The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics 2nd edn (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008), http://www.dictionaryofeconomics.com/article?id=pde2008_E000200>, date accessed 10 December 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Detections of plutonium in Lithuania available here. G. Lujanienė, S. Byčenkienė, P. Povinec, M. Gera (27 December 2011) “Radionuclides from the Fukushima Accident in the Air over Lithuania: Measurement and Modeling Approaches,” Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 114, 71–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. See Y-G Zhu and E. Smolders (2000) “Plant Uptake of Radiocaesium: A Review of Mechanisms, Regulation and Application,” Journal of Experimental Botany, 51(351), 1635–1645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. A study challenging TEPCO’s early estimates of radiation released: A. Stohl, P. Seibert, G. Wotawa, D. Arnold, J. F. Burkhart, S. Eckhardt, C. Tapia, A. Vargas, and T. J. Yasunari (2011) “Xenon-133 and Caesium-137 Releases into the Atmosphere from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant: Determination of the Source Term, Atmospheric Dispersion, and Deposition,” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 12, 2313–2343. The French anti-nuclear organization AIPRI (Association Internationale pour la Protection contre les Rayons Ionisants [International Association for Protection against Ionizing Rays]) calculated 400.8 million toxic doses from xenon alone were released from Fukushima. AIPRI (4 November 2011) “Le Xenon 133 Très Faiblement Radiotoxique de Fukushima,” http://aipri. blogspot.com/2011/11/le-xenon-133-tres-faiblement.html, date accessed 27 November 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. For research on the transportability of radioisotopes see C. Armstrong, M. Nyman, T. Shvareva, G. Sigmon, P. Burns, and A. Navrotsky (2012) “Uranyl Peroxide Enhanced Nuclear Fuel Corrosion in Seawater,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109.6, 1874–1877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Japanese municipal entities have been reporting concentrations of Iodine-131 in sewage sludge. For instance, Tokyo’s report for contamination in sludge and incineration ash dated 6 December 2011 for many areas of Japan is available at www.gesui.metro.tokyo.jp/oshi/infn0579.htm. Gunma’s report is available at http://www.pref.gunma.jp/cate_list/ct00005089.html. Increasing detections of Iodine-131, which has an eight-day half-life, indicate ongoing fission. C. Busby (27 December 2011) Russia Today, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1F0uFAWV7uc, date accessed 30 December 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. Friedberg, G. Walker, W. Siede, R. Wood, R. Schultz, and T. Ellenberger (2006) DNA Repair and Mutagenesis, 2nd edn (Washington DC: ASM Press), p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. O. Smith and J. S. Robert (2008) “Conceptual and Normative Dimensions of Toxicogenomics,” in R. Sharp, G. Marchant, and J. Grodsky (eds), Genomics and Environmental Regulation: Science, Ethics, and Law (Baltimore: John Hopkins), p. 230.

    Google Scholar 

  12. H. J. Muller (1927) “Artificial Transmutation of the Gene,” Science, 46, 84–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. R. L. Miller (1986) Under the Cloud: The Decades of Nuclear Testing (New York: The Free Press), p. 203.

    Google Scholar 

  14. As documented here: A. Froggatt, D. McNeill, S. Tomas and R. Teul (February 2013) “Fukushima Fallout: Nuclear Business Makes People Pay and Suffer” (Amsterdam: Greenpeace), http://www.greenpeace.org/international/Global/international/publications/nuclear/2013/FukushimaFallout.pdf, date accessed 28 February 2013.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2013 Majia Holmer Nadesan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nadesan, M.H. (2013). Introduction to Fukushima and the Privatization of Risk . In: Fukushima and the Privatization of Risk. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137343123_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics