• Clara Fischer
Part of the Breaking Feminist Waves book series (BFW)


This book concerns itself with change—perhaps not the unlimited improvement John Dewey had in mind, but nonetheless with change. It, too, takes as its starting point the necessity for social transformation, and affords human nature a central role in an elucidation of change. The impetus to do so stems from feminism, which in its normativity requires the realization of change. For, although feminism is many things to many people, it uniformly presumes a lack, dysfunction, or inadequacy in current states of affairs, and seeks to redress these—whether this be called the realization of gender equality, the dismantling of capitalist-patriarchy, or the destruction of the “master’s house,” 1 underpinning the manifold of feminisms is a belief in the need for change.


Greek Mythology Oppressive System Feminist Literature Feminist Consciousness Sociopolitical Change 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Lorde, A., “The Master’s Tools Will Never Dismantle the Master’s House” in Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches, Crossing Press, Trumansburg, NY, 1984.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Seigfried, C. H., “Shared Communities of Interest: Feminism and Pragmatism,” Hypatia, Vol. 8, No. 2, Spring 1993, pp. 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dickstein, M. (ed.), The Revival of Pragmatism: New Essays on Social Thought, Law, and Culture, Duke University Press, Durham & London, 1998.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Even where these texts are not directly quoted, their influence on my development of a feminist-pragmatism has been invaluable—see, for example, Addams, J., Democracy and Social Ethics, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1964;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Addams, J., Writings on Peace, Fischer, M. and Whipps, J. D. (eds.), Continuum, London, 2005;Google Scholar
  6. Addams, J., Twenty Years at Hull House: With Autobiographical Notes, University of Illinois Press, Urbana & Chicago, 1990;Google Scholar
  7. Seigfried, C. H., Pragmatism and Feminism: Reweaving the Social Fabric, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1996;Google Scholar
  8. Seigfried, C. H. (ed.), Feminist Interpretations of John Dewey, The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, 2002;Google Scholar
  9. Seigfried, C. H., “The Missing Perspective: Feminist Pragmatism,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, Vol. 27, No. 4, Autumn 1991, pp. 405–417;Google Scholar
  10. Sullivan, S., Living Across and Through Skins: Transactional Bodies, Pragmatism, and Feminism, Indiana University Press, Bloomington & Indianapolis, 2001;Google Scholar
  11. Sullivan, S., Revealing Whiteness: The Unconscious Habits of Racial Privilege, Indiana University Press, Bloomington & Indianapolis, 2006;Google Scholar
  12. and Sullivan, S., “From the Foreign to the Familiar: Confronting Dewey Confronting Racial Prejudice,” Journal of Speculative Philosophy, Vol. 18, No. 3, 2004, pp. 193–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 5.
    Miller, P. H., “Contemporary Perspectives from Human Development: Implications for Feminist Scholarship,” Signs, Vol. 31, No. 2, Winter 2006, pp. 445–471, p. 449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 6.
    Boisvert, R. D., “Heteronomous Freedom” in Philosophy and the Reconstruction of Culture: Pragmatic Essays after Dewey, Stuhr, J. J. (ed.), State University of New York Press, Albany, 1993, p. 132.Google Scholar
  15. 7.
    Lloyd, G. E. R., Polarity and Analogy, Cambridge University Press, London, 1966;Google Scholar
  16. du Bois, P., Centaurs and Amazons: Women and the Pre-History of the Great Chain of Being, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 1994.Google Scholar
  17. 9.
    See Nye, A., Words of Power: A Feminist Reading of the History of Logic, Routledge, London, 1990;Google Scholar
  18. Songe-Møller, V., Philosophy Without Women: The Birth of Sexism in Western Thought, Continuum, London, 2002.Google Scholar
  19. 10.
    Alderman, H., “By Virtue of a Virtue” in Virtue Ethics: A Critical Reader, Statman, D. (ed.), Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC, 1997, p. 160.Google Scholar
  20. 11.
    Dewey, J., Human Nature and Conduct in John Dewey: The Middle Works, 1899–1924, Vol. 14: 1922, Boydston, J. A. (ed.), Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale & Edwardsville, 2008, p. 36.Google Scholar
  21. 12.
    As will be elaborated upon later, Dewey outlines the self by means of an analogy with a house—see Dewey, J., Experience and Nature in John Dewey: The Later Works, 1925–1953, Vol. 1: 1925, Boydston, J. A. (ed.), Southern Illionois University Press, Carbondale & Edwardsville, 1981, p. 64.Google Scholar
  22. 13.
    Dewey, J., How We Think in John Dewey: The Middle Works, 1899–1924, Vol. 6: 1910–1911, Boydston, J. A. (ed.), Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale & Edwardsville, 2008, p. 191.Google Scholar
  23. 14.
    Ferguson, A., “Moral Responsibility and Social Change: A New Theory of Self,” Hypatia, Vol. 1, No. 3, Summer 1997, pp. 116–142, p. 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 15.
    Hill Collins, P., “The Social Construction of Black Feminist Thought,” Signs, Vol. 14, No. 4, Summer 1989, pp. 745–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 16.
    For more on the history ofthis concept see Davis, K., “Intersectionality as Buzzword: A Sociology of Science Perspective on What Makes a Feminist Theory Successful,” Feminist Theory, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2008, pp. 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 17.
    Epp, R. H., “Review of J. J. Chambliss: The Influence of Plato and Aristotle on John Dewey’s Philosophy,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, Vol. 28, No. 1, Winter 1992, pp. 156–159.Google Scholar
  27. 18.
    See Chambliss, J. J., The Influence of Plato and Aristotle on John Dewey’s Philosophy, Edwin Mellen Press, Lewiston, Queenston, & Lampeter, 1990;Google Scholar
  28. Veazie, W. B., “John Dewey and the Revival of Greek Philosophy,” University of Colorado Studies / Series in Philosophy, 1961, pp. 1–10;Google Scholar
  29. Anderson, F. M., “Dewey’s Experiment with Greek Philosophy,” International Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 7, No. 1, 1967, pp. 86–100;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. and Anton, J. P., “John Dewey and Ancient Philosophies,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. 25, No. 4, 1965, pp. 477–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 19.
    Fahy, G. M., “A Comparison of the Ethical Thought of Aristotle and John Dewey,” PhD thesis, Boston University, 1998.Google Scholar
  32. 20.
    Pagan, N. O., “Configuring the Moral Self: Aristotle and Dewey,” Foundations of Science, Vol. 13, Nos. 3/4, 2008, pp. 239–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 21.
    Welchman, J., Dewey’s Ethical Thought, Cornell University Press, New York, 1995.Google Scholar
  34. 22.
    Gouinlock, J., John Dewey’s Philosophy of Value, Humanities Press, New York, 1972.Google Scholar
  35. 23.
    Fesmire, S., John Dewey and Moral Imagination: Pragmatism in Ethics, Indiana University Press, Bloomington & Indianapolis, 2003.Google Scholar
  36. 24.
    Pappas, G. F., John Dewey’s Ethics: Democracy as Experience, Indiana University Press, Bloomington & Indianapolis, 2008.Google Scholar
  37. 25.
    For early moral theorizing see Dewey, J., The Study of Ethics: A Syllabus in John Dewey: The Early Works, 1882–1898, Vol. 4, 1893–1894, Boydston, J. A. (ed.), Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, 1975;Google Scholar
  38. for a rather textbook like exposition see Dewey, J. and Tufts, J., Ethics in John Dewey: The Later Works, 1925–1953, Vol. 7: 1932, Boydston, J. A. (ed.), Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale & Edwardsville, 1985;Google Scholar
  39. for a brief comparative analysis of ethical theories see Dewey, J., “Three Independent Factors in Morals” in John Dewey: The Later Works, 1925–1953, Vol. 5: 1929–1930, Boydston, J. A. (ed.), Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale & Edwardsville, 1984;Google Scholar
  40. 26.
    See for example, Aboulafia, M., Bookman, M., and Kemp, C. (eds.), Habermas and Pragmatism, Routledge, London, 2002;Google Scholar
  41. 29.
    See for example, Stacey, J., “Sexism by a Subtler Name? Postindustrial Conditions and Postfeminist Consciousness in Silicon Valley” in Women, Class, and the Feminist Imagination, Hansen, K. V. and Philipson, I. J. (eds.), Temple University Press, Philadelphia, 1990;Google Scholar
  42. and Coppock, V., Haydon, D., and Richter, I., The Illusions of “Post-Feminism”: New Women, Old Myths, Taylor & Francis, London, 1995.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Clara Fischer 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Clara Fischer

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations