Advertisement

Two Mexicos or Beyond Mexico? Comparative Cross-Border Governance

  • Imtiaz Hussain
Chapter
  • 44 Downloads

Abstract

The United States is not alone with a “southern immigration problem.” Mexico both mirrors the US predicament and feeds into it: Vast and loosely patrolled borders have witnessed illegal migrants cross over from the less-developed southern neighbors to both Mexico and the United States, while the one-size-fits-all neoliberal flavor (without necessarily becoming a causal factor) from the 1990s converted the United States into the be-all and end-all illegal migrant destination and Mexico into the migrant platform country par excellence.

Keywords

North American Free Trade Agreement Mexican Immigration Mexican Migration Mexican Government Central American Country 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Azpuru, Dinorah. “Peace and Democratization in Guatemala: Two Parallel Processes.” In Contemporary Peace Processes in Latin America, edited by Cynthia J. Armson. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center, 1999.Google Scholar
  2. Borjas, Georges J. “The Economic iImpact of Mexican Immigration.” In Coming Together? Mexico—U.S. Relations, edited by Barry P. Bosworth, Susan M. Collins, and Nora Claudia Lustig. Washington, DC: Brookings, 1997.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, Timothy C. “The Fourth Member of NAFTA: The U.S.—Mexico Border.” Annals of the American Political and Social Sciences 550.1 (1997): 105–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burgos, Vanessa. “Mexico—Guatemala: The Other Border.” Upside-down World, November 14. http://upsidedownworld.org/main/mexico-archives-79/1004-mexico-guatemala-the-other-.
  5. Bustamante, Jorge A. “Measuring the Flows of Undocumented Immigrants.” In Mexican Migration to the United States: Origins, Consequences, and Policy Options, edited by Wayne A. Cornelius and Bustamante. La Jolla: Center for Mexican—U.S. Studies, University of California, San Diego, 1989.Google Scholar
  6. Castillo, Manuel Angel. “Mexico: Caught between the United States and Central America.” Migration Information Source, April 2006. http://wwwmigrationinformation.org/Feature/display.cfn?id=389.Google Scholar
  7. —. “The Mexico—Guatemala Border: New Controls on Transborder Migrations in View of Recent Integration Schemes?” Frontera Norte 15.29 (January–June 2003): 35–65.Google Scholar
  8. Donnelly, Thomas. “Homeland Defense and the U.S. Military.” American Enterprise Institute Outlook Series. (October 2004). http://www.aei.org/outlook21484.Google Scholar
  9. Ganster, Paul, and David E. Lorey. The U.S.—Mexican Border into the Twenty-First Century. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2008.Google Scholar
  10. Huntington, Samuel P. The Clash of Civilization and the Remaking of World Order. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster, 1998.Google Scholar
  11. Hussain, Imtiaz A. Reevaluating NAFTA: Theory and Practice. New York, NY: Palgrave, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. —. Running on Empty in Central America? Canadian, Mexican, and U.S. Integrative Efforts. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 2006.Google Scholar
  13. —. Globalization, Indigenous Groups, and Mexico’s Panama-Puebla Plan: Marriage or Miscarriage? New York, NY: Edwin Mellen Press, 2006.Google Scholar
  14. Katzenstein, Peter, ed. Between Power and Plenty: Foreign Economic Policies of Advanced Industrialized States. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  15. Krasner, Stephen D. “Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables.” In International Regimes, edited by Stephen Krasner. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  16. LeMay, Michael C. U.S. Immigration: A Reference Handbook. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC CLIO, 2004.Google Scholar
  17. Lowndes, Vivien. “Institutionalism.” In Theory and Methods in Political Science, edited by David Marsh and Gerry Stoker. London: Palgrave, 2002.Google Scholar
  18. Lozano Ascencio, Fernando. Bringing it Back: Remittances to Mexico from Migrant Workers in the United States. La Jolla: Center for Mexican—U.S. Studies, University of California, San Diego, 1993.Google Scholar
  19. Marks, Gary, Liesbet Hooge, and Kermit Blank. “European Integration from the 1980s: State-centric v. Multi-centric Governance.” Journal of Common Market Studies 34.5 (September 1996): 341–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. —, “Mexico Sees Record Drop in Remittances: Money Sent Home by Mexicans Abroad Plunged 15.7 Percent during Economic Slowdown.” CBS News, January 27, 2010. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/01/27/world/main6148649.shtml.
  21. Morgenthau, Hans J. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf, 1948.Google Scholar
  22. Payan, Tony. The Three U.S.—Mexico Border Wars: Drugs, Immigration, and Homeland Security. Westport, CT: Praeger Security International, 2006.Google Scholar
  23. Rosenau, James N. Along the Domestic-Foreign Frontier: Exploring Governance in a Turbulent World. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schmidt, Henry C. The Roots of Lo Mexicano: Self and Society in Mexican Thought, 1900–1934. College Station: Texas A & M University, 2000.Google Scholar
  25. Snidal, Duncan. “Public Goods, Property Rights, and International Organizations.” International Studies Quarterly 23 (December 1979): 532–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Spalding, Rose J. “From Low-Intensity War to Low-Intensity Peace: The Nicaraguan Peace Process.” In Contemporary Peace Processes in Latin America, edited by Cynthia J. Armson. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center, 1999.Google Scholar
  27. U.S. Congress. Immigration Commission Report. Senate Immigration Commission. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Office, 1911.Google Scholar
  28. —, “U.S. ‘is responsible too’: Obama: US Intensifies Mexican Security Crisis, FCH ‘Outstanding Partner.’” The News, May 20, 2010, 1. This is Mexico City’s leading/only English daily. FCH refers to the country’s president, Felipe Calderón Hinosoja.Google Scholar
  29. Waltz, Kenneth N. Theory of International Politics. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley, 1979.Google Scholar
  30. Wehr, Paul, and John Paul Lederach. “Mediating Conflict in Central America.” In Resolving International Conflicts: The Theory and Practice of Mediation, edited by Jacob Bercovitch, 55–74. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1996.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Imtiaz Hussain 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Imtiaz Hussain

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations