Advertisement

Governance, Networks, and Drug Trafficking in North America

  • Roberto Domínguez
Chapter
  • 41 Downloads

Abstract

The consumption of prohibited substances has been inextricably linked to human societies and each one has historically found channels to subtly control the effects of illegal markets on their political, economic, and social structures. While the consumption of illicit drugs is not a novelty, particularly in the United States, the violence in Mexico associated with drug trafficking has reached unprecedented levels with over 70 thousand killings from the end of 2006 to early 2013. From the perspective of national and regional security, the problem of drug trafficking at the US—Mexico border is becoming unmanageable and has crossed a threshold of tolerance whereby the authority of the state, particularly in Mexico, has been eroded and, in some cases, controlled by drug cartels.

Keywords

Organize Crime Drug Trafficking Global Governance Alternative Development Mexican Government 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Allison, Graham. “The Impact of Globalization on National and International Security.” In Governance in a Globalized World, edited by Joseph Nye and John Donahue. Washington DC: Brookings Institution, 2000.Google Scholar
  2. Binkley, Joel. “US lists its Pluses and Minuses in Fighting Narcotics Worldwide.” New York Times, March 2, 2006.Google Scholar
  3. Bureau for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs. Memorandum of Justification Concerning the Secretary of State’s 2006 Certification of Conditions Related to the Aerial Eradication of Illicit Coca and Opium Poppy in Colombia, Washington, DC, August 22, 2006. Accessed June 12, 2010. http://www.state.gov/p/inl/rls/rpt/aeicc/70974.htm.Google Scholar
  4. Buxton, Julia. The Political Economy of Narcotics. London: Zed Books, 2006.Google Scholar
  5. Cardoso, Fernando Henrique, Cesar Gaviria, and Ernesto Zedillo. “The War on Drugs Is a Failure.” Wall Street Journal, February 23, 2009.Google Scholar
  6. Chabat, Jorge. “La iniciativa Mérida y la Relación México-Estados Unidos: En Busca de la Confianza Perdida.” In La Iniciativa Mérida Nuevo Paradigma de Cooperación entre México y Estados Unidos en Seguridad?, edited by Rafael Velázques Flores and Juan Pablo Lallande. Mexico: UNAM, 2009.Google Scholar
  7. CONADIC. Encuesta Nacional de Adicciones 2008. Mexico: CONADIC, 2009.Google Scholar
  8. Dingwerth, K., and P. Pattberg. “Global Governance as a Perspective on World Politics.” Global Governance 12 (2006).Google Scholar
  9. Drug Enforcement Administration. Successes in the Fight against Drugs. Washington, DC: Office of Public Affairs, December 2008.Google Scholar
  10. —. “Southwest Border Initiative.” Accessed October 1, 2009. http://www.usdoj.gov/dea/programs/sbi.htm.Google Scholar
  11. Drug Enforcement Agency. “Cities in which Mexican DTOs Operate within the United States.” Situation Report, 2008. Accessed March 23, 2010. http://www.usdoj.gov/ndic/pubs27/27986/index.htm.Google Scholar
  12. Dombey, Daniel. “Mexican Cartel Hot in US Drugs Swoop.” Financial Times, October 23, 2009.Google Scholar
  13. Felbab-Brown, Vanda. “The Violent Drug Market in Mexico and Lessons from Colombia.” Policy Paper no. 12. Washington DC: Brookings Institution, March 2009.Google Scholar
  14. Flores-Macias, Gustavo. “Colombia can Win Mexico’s Drug War.” New York Times, July 29, 2010.Google Scholar
  15. Ford, Jess T. “Mérida Initiative. The United States has Provided Counternarcotics and Anticrime Support but Need Better Performance Measures.” Report to Congressional Requesters. Washington DC: US Government Accountability Office, 2010.Google Scholar
  16. Jacobson, Roberta S. “U.S.-Mexico Security Cooperation: Next Steps for the Merida Initiative.” Testimony before the Western Hemisphere Subcommittee and the Homeland Security Border, Maritime, and Global Counterterrorism Subcommittee of the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Foreign Affairs, May 27, 2010.Google Scholar
  17. Krahman, Elke. New Threats and New Actors in International Security. Gordonsville, VA: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Millman, Joel. “Mexican Pot Gangs Infiltrate Indian Reservations in U.S.” Wall Street Journal, November 5, 2009.Google Scholar
  19. Mosher, Clayton J., and Scott Akins. Drugs and Drug Policy: The Control of Consciousness Alteration. London: Sage, 2006.Google Scholar
  20. Moore, Solomon. “Borders Prove No Obstacle for Mexican Cartels.” New York Times, February 2, 2009.Google Scholar
  21. National Drug Intelligence Center. “National Drug Threat Summary.” National Drug Threat Assessment 2008, October, 2007. Accessed July 15, 2009. http://www.usdoj.gov/nd-ic/pubs25/25921/summary.htm.Google Scholar
  22. —. National Drug Threat Assessment 2008, Washington DC, October 2007. Accessed November 6, 2008. http://www.usdoj.gov/nd-ic/pubs25/25921/heroin.htm).
  23. National Institute of Drug Abuse. “Principles of Drug Abuse Treatment for Criminal Justice Populations.” Accessed June 25, 2010. http://www.nida.nih.gov/PODAT_CI/principles/.Google Scholar
  24. Office of National Control Policy. “Prevention.” Accessed, July 23, 2009. http://www.white-housedrugpolicy.gov/PREVENT/sports/index.html.Google Scholar
  25. Placido, Antonio. “The US Government’s Domestic Obligations under the Merida Initiative.” Statement for the Record before the House Foreign Affairs Committee Subcommittee on the Western Hemisphere, February 7, 2008. Accessed September 19, 2009. http://www.usdoj.gov/dea/spee-ches/s020708.html.
  26. Rosenau, James. “Patterned Chaos in Global Life: Structures and Process in the Two Worlds of World Politics.” International Political Science Review 9.4 (1988).Google Scholar
  27. —. “Governance in the Twenty-first Century.” Global Governance 1.1 (1995).Google Scholar
  28. Secretaria de Seguridad Publica. Mexico and the Fight against Drug Trafficking and Organized Crime: Setting the Record Straight. Washington, DC: Embassy of Mexico, 2009.Google Scholar
  29. Secretaria de Salud. Programa de Acción Específico 2007–2012: Prevención y tratamiento de las adicciones. 2008.Google Scholar
  30. Simpson, Cam, and Evan Perez. “Congress Aims to Police Border Violence.” Wall Street Journal, March 11, 2009.Google Scholar
  31. Slaughter, Anne-Marie. A New World Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
  32. Smouts, Marie-Claude. “The Proper Use of Governance in International Relations.” International Social Science Journal 50.155 (March 1998).Google Scholar
  33. —, “The War on Drugs Starts Here.” New York Times. February 13, 2008Google Scholar
  34. Thompson, Ginger. “US Taking Steps to Control Violence on the Mexican Border.” New York Times, March 25, 2009.Google Scholar
  35. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. 2009. World Drug Report 2008. Accessed July 30, 2009. http://www.uno-dc.org/documents/wdr/WDR_2008/WDR2008_Overview.pdf.
  36. —. World Drug Report 2006. New York.Google Scholar
  37. Velazquez, Rafael, and Juan Pablo Lallande, eds. La Iniciativa Mérida zNuevo Paradigma de Cooperación entre México y Estados Unidos en Seguridad? Mexico: UNAM, 2009.Google Scholar
  38. Veillette, Connie. “Plan Colombia: A Progress Report.” CRS Report for Congress, February 17, 2005.Google Scholar
  39. White House. National Drug Control Strategy 2009. Accessed September 10, 2009. http://www.white-housedrugpolicy.gov/publications/policy/ndcs09/2009ndcs.pdf.

Copyright information

© Imtiaz Hussain 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roberto Domínguez

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations