Skip to main content
  • 68 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, I delve into detail about how we built a campaign both on the ground and on the Internet. Among other things, I will look at a critical and much debated question: How has the Internet, which has changed our lives in so many different ways, changed politics, and how will it do so in the future?1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. The argument of this chapter parallels that of one of first serious analyses of the Internet in politics, Michael Cornfield’s Politics Moves Online (New York: Twentieth Century Foundation, 2004). Cornfield argued that the Internet had not revolutionized political campaigns but, rather, was a new tool that enabled politicians and citizens to carry out usual political operations in a different although sometimes more efficient way. That’s basically the case for issue advocacy as well, as the Internet is most useful when it reinforces traditional field organizing.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America, trans. George Lawrence (New York: Anchor Books, 1969), vol. 2, pt. 2, ch. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. James Q. Wilson, Political Organizations (New York: Basic Books, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  4. James Q. Wilson, American Governmnent, 4th ed. (Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath and Company, 1989), 216.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Theda Skocpol, Diminished Democracy: From Membership to Management in American Civic Life (Oklahoma City: University of Oklahoma Press, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dave Karpf, The Move-On Effect (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Lawrence Goodwyn, The Populist Moment (New York: Oxford University Press, 1978), xxix.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Richard Kirsch, Fighting for Our Health (Albany, NY: The Rockefeller Institute Press, 2011), 68.

    Google Scholar 

  9. I’m a little embarrassed that I had not thought of this possible explanation before, because I took courses with Leon V. Sigal, whose book Reporters and Officials: The Organization and Politics of Newsmaking (New York: D. C. Heath and Co, 1973) pioneered the study of newspapers as bureaucratic organizations. While Sigal’s book is about a long- ago era in journalism, I highly recommend the book to organizers as a guide to thinking about how to deal with the press. I’m sorry I didn’t reread it before or during the HCAN campaign.

    Google Scholar 

  10. On how Washington gained power by accepting limits on his power, see Gary Wills, Cincinnatus: George Washington and the Enlightenment (New York: Doubleday, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2013 Marc Stier

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stier, M. (2013). Virtually Real. In: Grassroots Advocacy and Health Care Reform. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137341976_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics