Pulling the Ropes: Convenient Indeterminacies and the Negotiation of Power at Kaya’s Border Checkpoint
This chapter illustrates the performance of state power at two border checkpoints in the triangle between South Sudan, Uganda, and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), using two situations related to ropes hung across the road in Kaya and Bazi in Morobo Counry.1 The ropes constituted southern Sudan’s checkpoints with neighboring DRC and Uganda in Bazi and Kaya, respectively.
KeywordsLocal Police Road Toll Taxation Department Practical Norm Military Intelligence
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Sally F. Moore, Law As Process: An Anthropological Approach (London: Routledge, 1978), 39.Google Scholar
- 3.Clyde J. Mitchell, “Case and Situation Analysis,” in The Manchester School. Practice and Ethnographic Praxis in Anthropology, eds T. M. S. Evens and Don Handelman (New York: Berghahn Books, 2006), 23–42.Google Scholar
- 4.Deconcentrated state agents represent the authorities of the central state in a local context, in this case the Government of southern Sudan. This differs from decentralized agents who carry out tasks and are accountable to a lower level of government, for instance, the state government or a county. See Bernard Bizet, “Deconcentration versus Decentralisation of Administration in France: A Centre—Periphery Dilemma.” Canadian Journal of Regional Science XXV 3 (2002): 475–490.Google Scholar
- 6.Øystein H. Rolandsen, Guerrilla Government, Political Changes in the Southern Sudan during the 1990s (Uppsala, Sweden: Nordiska Afrikainstitutet, 2005), 158.Google Scholar
- 7.John Young, “Sudan: The Incomplete Transition from the SPLA to the SPLM,” in From Soldiers to Politicians. Transforming Rebel Movements after Civil War, ed. Jeroen de Zeeuw (Boulder, CO, and London: Lynne Rienner, 2008), 157–178.Google Scholar
- 8.Anthony Giddens, The Constitution of Society (Oxford: Blackwell, 1984);Google Scholar
- Timothy Mitchell, “Society Economy and the State Effect,” in State/Culture: State Formation after the Cultural Turn, ed. George Steinmetz (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1999), 76–97.Google Scholar
- 9.Monique Nuijten, “Power in Practice: A Force Field Approach to Natural Resource Management,” Journal of Transdisciplinary Environmental Studies 4:2 (2005): 1–14 (see p. 2).Google Scholar
- 41.Timothy Mitchell, “The Limits of the State: Beyond Statist Approaches and Their Critics.” American Political Science Review 85:1 (1991): 94.Google Scholar