Skip to main content

Part of the book series: European Administrative Governance ((EAGOV))

Abstract

The concept of the European administrative space (see chapters 1 and 5 in this volume) provides a fertile testing ground for theories and empirical cases that probe the relationship between the administrative and the political in European public policy making. However, the pursuit of this agenda involves conjuring up not only an ‘administrative’ space, but also an equivalent political space (also referred to in much of the literature as a political ‘sphere’). If the European administrative space refers to the EU’s multilevel administrative system (Chapter 1), the European political space implies the existence of an equivalent multilevel political system. This chapter considers how these two ‘spaces’ — the European administrative space and the European political space — meet and interact/overlap to allow organizations sited at their confluence to draw on both administrative and political resources to influence policy making and ultimately policy outputs (Chapter 1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bauer, M. W. (2012) ‘Tolerant, If Personal Goals Remain Unharmed: Explaining Supranational Bureaucrats Attitudes to Organizational Change’, Governance, 25, 485–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barroso, J. M. (2011a) ‘Remarks by President Barroso on the Commission’s Proposals for the 2014–2020 Multi-Annual Financial Framework’, Press Conference, Brussels, 29 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barroso, J. M. (2011b) ‘Barroso: EU budget “is austere”’, The Sunday Times, 3 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • BiJ (Bureau of Investigative Journalists) (2011) ‘Revealed: EU Commission Spending on Private Luxury Hotels and Drinks Receptions’, Press Release 1 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand, C. (2011a) ‘EU “cannot Ignore Austerity Measures”, Commissioner Warns’, European Voice, 10 February, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand, C. (2011b) ‘MEP Calls for Europe 2020 to Be a “Budget Priority”’, European Voice, 20 April, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand, C. (2012) ‘Budget Tussle Starts over Aid to Regions’, European Voice, 2 February, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaffin, J. (2011) ‘Cosseted Eurocrats Fact the Squeeze’, Financial Times, 22 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaffin, J. (2012) ‘Nations Try to Square the EU Budget Circle’, Financial Times, 5 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombes, D. (1970) Politics and Bureaucracy in the European Community: A Portrait of the Commission of the E.E.C. (London: Allen and Unwin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cram, L. (1999) ‘The European Commission’, in Cram, L., Dinan, D. and Nugent, N. (eds.) Developments in the European Union (Basingstoke: Macmillan), 44–61.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Demir, T. and Nyhan, R. C. (2008) ‘The Politics-Administration Dichotomy: An Empirical Search for Correspondence Between Theory and Practice’, Public Administration Review, 68, 81–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake, H. (2000) Jacques Delors: A Political Biography (London: Routledge).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ellinas, A. A. and Suleiman, E. (2012) The European Commission and Bureaucratic Autonomy: Europe’s Custodians (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Endo, K. (1999) The Presidency of the European Commission Under Jacques Delors: The Politics of Shared Leadership (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2000) Reforming the European Commission: A White Paper — Part I, COM (2000) 0200 final, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2008) European Union Public Finance, Fourth Edition (European Commission: Publications Office).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2011a) ‘Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF): Questions and Answers’, Memo, Brussels, MEMO/11/468, 29 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2011b) ‘Proposal for a Council Decision on the System of Own Resources of the European Union’ COM (2011) 510 final, 2011/0183 (CNS), Brussels, 29 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Voice. (2011) Leader, 6 January, 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, C. (1994) Inside the House That Jacques Built (London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartlapp, M., Metz, J. and Rauh, C. (2012) ‘Linking Agenda Setting to Coordination Structures: Bureaucratic Politics Inside the European Commission’, Journal of European Integration, 35, 425–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (2013) ‘The Little Engine That Wouldn’t: Supranational Entrepreneurship and the Barroso Commission’, Journal of European Integration, 35, 301–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L. (2012) ‘Images of Europe: How Commission Officials Conceive Their Institution’s Role’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 50, 87–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen, D. I. (2006) ‘The Relationship Between Politics and Administration: The Importance of Contingency Factors, Formal Structure, Demography, and Time’, Governance, 19, 303–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassim, H., Peterson, J., Bauer, M. W., Connolly, S., Dehousse, R., Hooghe, L. and Thompson, A. (2013) The European Commission of the Twenty-First Century (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • King, T. (2011) ‘Sefcovic Squares up to Staff Unions Over Pay’, European Voice, 24 November, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macmullen, A. (1999) ‘Political Responsibility for the Administration of Europe: The Commission’s Resignation’, Parliamentary Affairs, 52, 703–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ongaro, E. (2012) ‘Editorial Introduction: Managerial Reforms and the Transformation of the Administration of the European Commission’, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78, 379–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overeem, P. (2012) The Politics-Administration Dichotomy: Toward a Constitutional Perspective, Second Edition (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, G. (1994) Jacques Delors and European Integration (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (2004) (ed.) Politics and the European Commission (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Svara, J. H. (1998) ‘The Politics-Administration Dichotomy Model as Aberration’, Public Administration Review, 58, 51–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. (2011a) ‘Ministers to Urge Restraint in 2012 Budget Proposal’, European Voice, 10 February, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. (2011b) ‘EU Spending 2014–20’, European Voice, 7 July, 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. (2011c) ‘Member States Get Their Way on Budget’, European Voice, 24 November, 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. and Brand, C. (2011) ‘Barroso’s Budget Bid for 2014–20 Hides Increases’, European Voice, 30 June, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vigoda, E. (2000) ‘Internal Politics in Public Administration Systems: An Empirical Examination of its Relationship with Job Congruence, Organisational Citizenship Behaviour and in-Role Performance’, Public Personnel Management, 29, 185–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (2009) From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (Oxford: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, J. H. H. (2012) ‘In the Face of Crisis: Input Legitimacy, Output Legitimacy and the Political Messianism of European Integration’, Journal of European Integration, 34, 825–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wille, A. (2013) The Normalization of the European Commission: Politics and Bureaucracy in the EU Executive (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W. (1887) ‘The Study of Administration’, Political Science Quarterly, 2, 199–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Michelle Cini

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cini, M. (2015). The European Commission — Politics and Administration. In: Bauer, M.W., Trondal, J. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of the European Administrative System. European Administrative Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137339898_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics