Skip to main content

Part of the book series: European Administrative Governance ((EAGOV))

Abstract

Research on the administrative system at the level of the European Union (EU) has focused either on the macro-development of organizational structures (for example, Egeberg, 2006; Olsen, 2010) or on the micro-attitudes of administrative staff (for example, Hooghe, 2001; Kassim et al., 2013). While these aspects are commonly acknowledged in the literature, other sources of organizational variation have scarcely been explored. The latter include, in particular, patterns of organizational behavior, as they become apparent in the policy-making process with regard to the administration’s role in policy initiation, policy formulation, or policy implementation. For example, are some EU institutions more proactive in shaping the political agenda, while others play a more reactive role? Can we observe different administrative approaches with regard to either incremental or synoptic approaches to decision making? And is there variation in administrative styles of implementation?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Christiansen, T. (2006) ‘The European Commission: The European Executive Between Continuity and Change’, in J. Richardson (ed.) European Union: Power and Policy-Making, Third Edition (New York: Routledge), 99–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cini, M. (1996) The European Commission: Leadership, Organization, and Culture in the EU Administration (Manchester: Manchester University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cram, L. (1994) ‘The European Commission as a Multi-Organization: Social Policy and IT Policy in the EU’, Journal of European Public Policy, 1(2), 195–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egeberg, M. (2006): Multilevel Administration. The Transformation of Executive Politics in Europe (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eising, K. and Kohler-Koch, B. (2005) Interessenpolitik in Europa (Baden-Baden: Nomos).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellinas, A. A. and Suleiman, E. (2012) The European Commission and Bureaucratic Autonomy. Europe’s Custodians (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Geuijen, K., Hart, P., Princen, S. and Yesilkagit, K. (2008) The New Eurocrats. National Civil Servants in EU Policy-Making (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gornitzka, Å. and Sverdrup, U. (2008) ‘Who Consults? The Configuration of Expert Groups in the European Union’, West European Politics, 31, 725–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hix, S. (2005) The Political System of the European Union (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L. (2001) The European Commission and the Integration of Europe: Images of Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, M. (1991) ‘Policy Instruments, Policy Styles and Policy Implementation: National Approaches to Theories of Instrument Choice’, Policy Studies Journal, 19, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, M. (2003) ‘Administrative Styles and the Limits of Administrative Reform: A Neo-Institutional Analysis of Administrative Culture’, Canadian Public Administration, 46, 471–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jann, W. (2002) ‘Verwaltungskultur. Ein Überblick über den Stand der empirischen und international vergleichenden Forschung’, in K. König (ed.) Deutsche Verwaltung an der Wende zum 21. Jahrhundert (Baden-Baden: Nomos), 425–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassim, H., Peterson, J., Bauer, M. W., Connolly, S., Dehousse, R., Hooghe, L. and Thompson, A. (2013) The European Commission of the Twenty-First Century (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Knill, C. (2001) The Europeanisation of National Administrations: Patterns of Institutional Change and Persistence (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Knill, C. and Lenschow, A. (eds.) (2005) Implementing EU Environmental Policy. New Directions and Old Problems (Manchester: Manchester University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Knill, C. and Lenschow, A. (2005) ‘Compliance, Communication and Competition: Patterns of EU Environmental Policy Making and Their Impact on Policy Convergence’, European Environment, 15, 114–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knill, C. and Liefferink, D. (2007) Environmental Politics in the European Union: Policy-Making, Implementation and Patterns of Multilevel Governance (Manchester: Manchester University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Knill, C. and Tosun, J. (2010) Politikgestaltungin der Europäischen Union. Die Entstehungund Umsetzungder Dienstleistungsrichtlinie (Baden-Baden: Nomos).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, N. and Kirkpatrick, C. (2006) ‘Evidence-Based Policy Making in Europe: An Evaluation of European Commission Integrated Impact Assessments’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 24(1), 23–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, C. (1959) ‘The Science of Muddling Through’, Public Administration Review, 19, 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. and Olsen, J. P. (1989) Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics (New York: The Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazey, S. and Richardson, J. (1995) ‘Promiscuous Policymaking: The European Policy Style?’, in J. Richardson (ed.) The State of the European Union: Vol. III: Buildinga European Polity (Boulder: Rienner/Longman), 337–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, J. P. (2010) Governing Through Institution Building. Institutional Theory and Recent European Experiments in Democratic Organization (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Page, E. C. (1985) Political Authority and Bureaucratic Power: A Comparative Analysis (Brighton: Wheatsheaf).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G. (1994) ‘Agenda-Setting in the European Community’, Journal of European Public Policy, 1, 9–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G. and Pierre, J. (eds.) (2004) Politicization of the Civil Service in Comparative Perspective: The Quest for Control (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Princen, S. (2011) ‘Agenda-Setting Strategies in EU Policy Processes’, Journal of European Public Policy, 18, 927–943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radaelli, C. M. (1999) ‘The Public Policy of the European Union: Whither Politics of Expertise?’ Journal of European Public Policy, 6, 757–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. (2006) ‘Policy-Making in the EU: Interests, Ideas and an Garbage Can of Primeval Soup’, in Richardson, J (ed.) European Union — Power and Policy-Making (London: Routledge), 3–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J., Gustafsson, G. and Jordan, G. (1982) ‘The Concept of Policy Style’, in Richardson, J. (ed.) Policy Styles in Western Europe (London: Georg Allen & Unwin Publishers Ltd.), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrefler, L. (2010) ‘The Usage of Scientific Knowledge by Independent Regulatory Agencies’, Governance, 23, 309–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (1997) Administrative Behaviour, Fourth Edition (New York: The Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallberg, J. (2002a) ‘Delegation to Supranational Institutions: Why, How, and with What Consequences?’ Western European Politics, 25, 23–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallberg, J. (2002b) ‘Paths to Compliance: Enforcement, Management, and the European Union’, International Organization, 56, 609–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trondal, J., Marcussen, M. Larsson, T. and Veggeland, F. (2010) Unpacking International Organisations. The Dynamics of Compound Bureaucracies (Manchester: Manchester University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • van Waarden, F. (1995) ‘Persistence of National Policy Styles: A Study of Their Institutional Foundations’ in Unger, B. and van Waarden, F. (eds.) Convergence or Diversity? (Vermont: Ashgate Publishing Company).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, D. (1986) National Styles of Regulation: Environmental Policy in Great Britain and the United States (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. Q. (1989) Bureaucracy (New York: Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wonka, A. (2008) ‘Decision-Making Dynamics in the European Commission: Partisan, National or Sectoral?’ Journal of European Public Policy, 15, 1145–1163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Christoph Knill and Stephan Grohs

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Knill, C., Grohs, S. (2015). Administrative Styles of EU Institutions. In: Bauer, M.W., Trondal, J. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of the European Administrative System. European Administrative Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137339898_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics