Skip to main content

The Expert-Executive Nexus in the European Administrative System: Expert Groups and the European Commission

  • Chapter
The Palgrave Handbook of the European Administrative System

Part of the book series: European Administrative Governance ((EAGOV))

Abstract

The European administrative system is characterized by an interpenetration of different levels of government and multiple connections between the European Commission (Commission), European agencies, national and subnational administrations, and a range of non-state actors. Part of these administrative capacities involves the extensive use of specialized expertise in various stages and institutions at European level. Nowhere is this more prevalent than in the structure of EU committees and particularly in the set of expert groups under the Commission. This organized system of consultative connections constitutes a large system for preparing and implementing policies and a main organized nexus between outside experts and the EU executive.

This chapter is based on Gornitzka and Sverdrup (2011).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alter EU (2008) ‘Secrecy and corporate dominance — a study on the composition and transparency of European Commission Expert Group’, Brussels, http://www.corporatejustice.org/IMG/pdf/expertgroupsreport.pdf.

  • Andresen, S. (2000) Science and Politics in International Environmental Regimes: Between Integrity and Involvement (Manchester: Manchester University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Balla, S. J. and Wright, J. R. (2001) ‘Interest Groups, Advisory Committees, and Congressional Control of the Bureaucracy’, American Journal of Political Science, 45, 799–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M. N. and Finnemore, M. (2004) Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boswell, C. (2008) ‘The Political Functions of Expert Knowledge: Knowledge and Legitimation in European Union Immigration Policy’, Journal of European Public Policy, 15, 471–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouwen, P. (2004) ‘The Logic of Access to the European Parliament: Business Lobbying in the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 42, 473–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broscheid, A. and Coen, D. (2007) ‘Lobbying Activity and Fora Creation in the EU: Empirically Exploring the Nature of the Policy Good’, Journal of European Public Policy, 14, 346–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkel, J. T. (2005) ‘International Institutions and Socialization in Europe: Introduction and Framework’, International Organization, 59, 801–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, T. and Kirchner, E.J. (2000) Europe in Change. Committee Governance in the European Union (Manchester: Manchester University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtin, D. and Egeberg, M. (2008) ‘Tradition and innovation: Europe’s Accumulated Executive Order’, West European Politics, 31, 639–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egeberg, M. (2003) ‘How Bureaucratic Structure Matters: An Organizational Perspective’, in Peters, B.G. and Pierre, J. (eds.) Handbook of Public Administration (London: Sage), 116–126.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Egeberg, M. (2006a) ‘The Institutional Architecture of the EU and the Transformation of European Politics’, in Egeberg, M. (ed.) Multilevel Union Administration — The Transformation of Executive Politics in Europe (Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan), 17–30.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Egeberg, M. (ed.) (2006b) Multilevel Union Administration. The Transformation of Executive Politics in Europe (Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Egeberg, M., Schaefer, G. F. and Trondal, J. (2006) ‘EU Committee Governance Between Intergovernmental and Union Administration’, in Egeberg, M. (ed.) Multilevel Union Administration. The Transformation of Executive Politics in Europe (Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan), 66–85.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Egeberg, M. and Trondal, J. (2009) ‘National Agencies in the European Administrative Space: Government Driven, Commission Driven or Networked?’ Public Administration, 87, 779–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field, M. (2013) ‘The Anatomy of EU Policy-Making: Appointing the Experts’, European Integration online Papers (EIoP), 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gornitzka, Å. (2003) Science, Clients, and the State: A Study of Scientific Knowledge Production and Use (Enschede: CHEPS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gornitzka, Å. and Sverdrup, U. (2008) ‘Who Consults? The Configuration of Expert Groups in the European Union’, West European Politics, 31, 725–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gornitzka, Å. and Sverdrup, U. (2010) ‘Enlightened Decision Making? The Role of Scientists in EU Governance’, Politique Europénne, 32(3), 125–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gornitzka, Å. and Sverdrup, U. (2011) ‘Access of Experts: Information and EU Decision-making’, West European Politics, 34, 48–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, J. (2007) ‘Organized Civil Society and Democratic Legitimacy in the European Union’, British Journal of Political Science, 37, 333–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groenleer, M. (2009) The Autonomy of European Agencies: A Comparative Study of Institutional Development (Delft: Eburon).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, E. B., Williams, M. P. and Babai, D. (1977) Scientists and World Order: The Uses of Technical Knowledge in International Organizations (Berkeley: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holst, C. and Moodie, J. (2013) ‘For the Sake of Democracy? The European Commission’s Justifications for Democratizing Expertise’, Paper presented atEPISTO kick-of f Conference, 4–5 April 2013, University of Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassim, H., Peterson, J., Bauer, M. W., Connolly, S. J., Dehousse, R., Hooghe, L. and Thompson, A. (2013) The European Commission of the Twenty-first Century (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kelemen, R. D. and Tarrant, A. D. (2011) ‘The Political Foundations of the Eurocracy’, West European Politics, 34, 922–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsson, T. (2003) Precooking in the European Union — The World of Expert Groups (Stockholm: ESO — The Expert Group on Public Finance).

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. and Olsen, J. P. (1995) Democratic Governance (New York: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, L. L. and Simmons, B. A. (1998) ‘Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions’, International Organization, 52, 729–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazey, S. and Richardson, J. (2001) ‘Institutionalizing Promiscuity: Commission-Interest Group Relations in the European Union’, in Stone Sweet, A., Sandholtz, W. and Fligstein, N. (eds.) The Institutionalization of Europe (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 71–93.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Metz, J. (2011) The European Commission’s Expert Groups and Their Use in Policy Making (Doctoral Dissertation, Fachbereich Politik-und Sozialwissenschaften, Freie Universität Berlin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, J. (2013) ‘Expert Groups in the European Union: A sui Generis Phenomenon?’ Policy and Society, 32, 267–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, J.P. (2008) ‘The Ups and Downs of Bureaucratic Organization’, Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 13–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G. (1995) The Politics of Bureaucracy (New York: Longman Publishers USA).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Quaglia, L., De Francesco, F. and Radaelli, C. M. (2008) ‘Committee Governance and Socialization in the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy, 15, 155–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radaelli, C. M. (1999) ‘The Public Policy of the European Union: Whither Politics of Expertise?’, Journal of European Public Policy, 6, 757–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skogen, M. (2010) Business as Usual? Interest Groups in the European Union (Oslo: Master’s Thesis in Political Science, Department of Political Science, University of Oslo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher, M. (2011) ‘The Creation of European Regulatory Agencies and Its Limits: A Comparative Analysis of European Delegation’, Journal of European Public Policy, 18, 790–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Åse Gornitzka and Ulf Sverdrup

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gornitzka, Å., Sverdrup, U. (2015). The Expert-Executive Nexus in the European Administrative System: Expert Groups and the European Commission. In: Bauer, M.W., Trondal, J. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of the European Administrative System. European Administrative Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137339898_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics