Advertisement

Officials ‘Pre-Cooking’ EU Affairs? The Role of EP Officials in the Ordinary Legislative Procedure (OLP)

  • Mathias Dobbels
  • Christine Neuhold
Part of the European Administrative Governance book series (EAGOV)

Abstract

The European Parliament (EP) has been hailed as one of the ‘winners’ of the Lisbon Treaty (Mahoney, 2010). Indeed, since its entry into force, the EP is a co-legislator in almost all regulatory fields of the EU. The co-legislative powers of the EP now cover 85 Treaty articles and were extended into thus-far unchartered waters such as fisheries and the common commercial policy, to name just two examples. Moreover, what used to be the third pillar of freedom, security, and justice now falls in its entirety under the ordinary legislative procedure (OLP, formerly known as the co-decision procedure).

Keywords

Civil Servant Political Group European Parliament National Parliament Lisbon Treaty 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arnold, D. (1987) ‘Political Control of Administrative Officials’, Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 3, 279–286.Google Scholar
  2. Baron, F. (2013) ‘Civil Servants: How to Support the Political Level: The French Case’, in Neuhold, N., Vanhoonacker, S. and Verhey, L. (eds.) Civil Servants and Politics (Basingstoke: Palgrave), 108–123.Google Scholar
  3. Bauer, M. W. (2009) ‘Impact of Administrative Reform of the European Commission: Results from a Survey of Heads of Unit in Policy-making Directorates’, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75, 459–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burns, C. (2005) ‘Who Pays? Who Gains? How Do Costs and Benefits Shape the Policy Influence of the European Parliament?’ Journal of Common Market Studies, 43, 485–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell, S. and Laporte, J. (1981). ‘The Staff of the Parliamentary Assemblies in France’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 6, 521–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Christiansen, T. and Dobbels, M. (2012) ‘Comitology and Delegated Acts after Lisbon: How the European Parliament Lost the Implementation Game’, European Integration Online Papers.Google Scholar
  7. Corbett, R., Jacobs, F. and Shackleton, M. (2011) The European Parliament (London: John Harper Publishing).Google Scholar
  8. Curtin, D. and Egeberg, M. (2008) ‘Tradition and Innovation: Europe’s Accumulated Executive Order’, West European Politics, 31, 639–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DeGregorio, C. (1994) ‘Prof essional Committee Staff as Policy Making Partners in the U.S. Congress’, Congress & the Presidency, 21(1), 49–66.Google Scholar
  10. Dobbels, M. and Neuhold, C. (2013) ‘The Roles Bureaucrats Play: The Input of the European Parliament (EP) Administrators into the Ordinary Legislative Procedure: A Case Study Approach’, Journal of European Integration, 35, 375–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Egeberg, M., Gornitzka, A., Trondal, J. and Johannessen, M. (2013) ‘Parliament Staff: Unpacking the Behaviour of Officials in the European Parliament’, Journal of European Public Policy, 20, 495–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eurof ond. (2012) Working Time, http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/areas/industrial relations/dictionary/definitions/WORKINGTIME.htm, last assessed on 6 July 2012.
  13. European Commission. (2008) Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on novel foods and amending Regulation (EC) No. 257/97, COM(2007) 872 final, Brussels, 14 January 2008.Google Scholar
  14. European Communities. (1997) Regulation (EC) No. 258/97 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 1997 concerning novel foods and novel food ingredients, Official Journal L 043, Brussels, 14 February 1997, 1–6.Google Scholar
  15. European Communities. (2004) Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/personnel_administration/statut/tocen100. pdf last checked on 21 December 2011.
  16. European Parliament. (2008) Resolution on the cloning of animals for food supply, P6_TA-PROV(2008)0400, Brussels, 3 September 2008.Google Scholar
  17. Farrell, H. and Héritier, A. (2003) ‘Formal and Informal Institutions Under Codecision: Continuous Constitution-Building in Europe’, Governance, 16, 577–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fouilleux, E., de Maillard, J. and Smith, A. (2005) ‘Technical or Political? The Working Groups of the EU Council of Ministers’, Journal of European Public Policy, 12, 609–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gailmard, S. and Patty, J. (2007) ‘Slackers and Zealots: Civil Service, Policy Discretion, and Bureaucratic Expertise’, American Journal of Political Science, 51, 873–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Haege, F. M. (2007) ‘Committee Decision-Making in the Council of the European Union’, European Union Politics, 8, 299–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harfst, P. and Schnapp, K.-U. (2003) ‘Instrumente parlamentarischer Kontrolle der Exekutive in westlichen Demokratien’, Discussion Paper SP IV 2003–201 (Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung, WZB).Google Scholar
  22. Huber, J. (2000) ‘Delegation to Civil Servants in Parliamentary Democracies’, European Journal of Political Research, 37, 397–413.Google Scholar
  23. Hix, S. and Noury, A. (2009) ‘After Enlargement: Voting Patterns in the Sixth European Parliament’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 34, 159–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hix, S., Noury, A. and Roland, G. (2009) ‘Voting Patterns and Alliance Formation in the European Parliament’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 364, 821–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kassim, H., Peterson, J., Bauer, M. W., Connolly, S., Dehousse, R., Hooghe, L. and Thompson, A. (2013) The European Commission of the Twenty-first Century (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kietz, D. and Maurer, A. (2007) ‘The European Parliament in Treaty Reform: Predefining IGCs Through Interinstitutional Agreements’, European Law Journal, 13, 20–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lowi, T. (1979) The End of Liberalism (New York: W. W. Norton & Company).Google Scholar
  28. Mahoney, H. (2010) ‘European Council Seen as Winner Under Lisbon Treaty’, EUObserver, 27 May.Google Scholar
  29. Marshall, D. (2012) ‘Do Rapporteurs Receive Independent Expert Policy Advice? Indirect Lobbying via the European Parliament’s Committee Secretariat’, Journal of European Public Policy, 19, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McCubbins, M. D., Noll, R. G. and Weingast, B. R. (1987) ‘Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control’, Journal of Law, Economics & Organization, 3, 243–277.Google Scholar
  31. Neuhold, C. (2008) ‘Taming the “Trojan Horse” of Comitology? Accountability Issues of Comitology and the Role of the European Parliament’, European Integration Online Papers, 12(8), 1–17.Google Scholar
  32. Neunreither, K. (2006) ‘Elected Legislators and Their Unelected Assistants in the European Parliament’, Journal of Legislative Studies, 8(4), 40–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Olsen, J. (2006) ‘Maybe It Is Time to Rediscover Bureaucracy’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Page, E. and Jenkins, B. (2005) Policy Bureaucracy: Government with a Cast of Thousands (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Patterson, S. C. (1970) ‘The Prof essional Staffs of Congressional Committees’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 15, 22–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Peters, G. (1998) Comparative Politics — Theory and Methods (New York: New York University Press).Google Scholar
  37. Peters, G. (2013) ‘Politicization. What Is It and Why Should We Care?’ in Neuhold, C., Vanhoonacker, S. and Verhey, L. (eds.) Civil Servants and Politics (Basingstoke: Palgrave).Google Scholar
  38. Reh, C. (2007) ‘Pre-Cooking the European Constitution? The Role of Government Representatives in EU Reform’, Journal of European Public Policy, 14, 1186–1207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rittberger, B. (2005) Democratic Representation Beyond the Nation-State (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  40. Romanyshyn, J. and Neuhold, C. (2013) ‘The European Parliament’s Administration: Between Neutral and Politicised Competence’, in Neuhold, C., Vanhoonacker, S. and Verhey, L. (eds.) Civil Servants and Politics (London: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
  41. Ryle, M. T. (1981) ‘The Legislative Staff of the British House of Commons’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 6, 497–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Reh, C., Héritier, A., Bressanelli, E. and Koop, C. (2013). ‘The Informal Politics of Legislation: Explaining Secluded Decision Making in the European Union’. Comparative Political Studies, 46(9), 1112–1142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shackleton, M. (2000) ‘The Politics of Co-Decision’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 38, 325–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Winzen, T. (2011) ‘Technical or Political? An Exploration of the Work of Officials in the Committees of the European Parliament’, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 17(1), 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wlezien, C. (2005) ‘On the Salience of Political Issues: The Problem with Most Important Problem’, Electoral Studies, 24, 555–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Mathias Dobbels and Christine Neuhold 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mathias Dobbels
    • 1
  • Christine Neuhold
    • 2
  1. 1.Maastricht UniversityThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Political Science, Faculty of Arts and Social SciencesMaastricht UniversityThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations