Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes: Existing Knowledge, Cutting-edge Themes, and Research Strategies

  • Chapter
Advances in International Environmental Politics

Abstract

A common observation among those concerned with solving environmental problems and, more generally, with promoting sustainability in human-environment relations is that governance systems work relatively well at the national level but poorly or not at all in efforts to solve international, transnational, and especially global problems (Speth, 2004).1 While the state is a positive force in managing natural resources and protecting the environment in domestic settings, the anarchic character of international society treated as a society of spatially demarcated sovereign states constitutes a barrier to successful governance at the international level.2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Works cited

  • Andresen, S. and J. Wettestad (2004) ‘Case Studies of the Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes’ in Regime Consequences, ed. Underdal, A. and O. R. Young (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers), 27–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andresen, S., E. L. Boassum and G. Hønneland (eds) (2012) International Environmental Agreements: An Introduction (New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, S. (2003) Environment and Statecraft: The Strategy of Environmental Treaty Making (New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, S. (2007) Why Cooperate? The Incentive to Supply Collective Goods (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernauer, T. (1996) ‘Protecting the Rhine River against Chloride Pollution’ in Institutions for Environmental Aid, ed. Keohane, R. O. and M. L. Levy (Cambridge: MIT Press), 201–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernauer, T. and P. Moser (1996) ‘Reducing Pollution of the River Rhine: The Influence of International Cooperation’ Journal of Environment and Development 5, 391–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernauer, T. and T. Siegfried (2008) ‘Compliance and Performance in International Water Agreements: The Case of the Naryn/Syr Darya Basin’ Global Governance 14, 479–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, S. (2005) ‘Legitimacy in Global Environmental Governance’ Journal of International Law and International Relations 1, 139–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, S. and L. W. Pauly (eds) (2007) Global Liberalism and Political Order: Towards a New Grand Compromise (Albany: State University of New York Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Betsill, M. and E. Corell (eds) (2007) NGO Diplomacy: The Influence of Nongovernmental Organizations in International Environmental Negotiations (Cambridge: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Biermann, F. and P. Pattberg (eds) (2012) Global Environmental Governance Reconsidered (Cambridge: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Biermann, F., M. M. Betsill, J. Gupta, N. Kanie, L. Lebel, D. Liverman, H. Schroeder and B. Siebenhüner with contributions from K. Conca, L. da Costa Ferreira, B. Desai, S. Tay and R. Zondervan (2009) Earth System Governance: People, Places, and the Planet, IHDP Report No. 20 (Bonn: IHDP).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, E. and C. Folke (2011) Adapting Institutions: Governance, Complexity, and Social-Ecological Systems (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Breitmeier, H., A. Underdal and O. R. Young (2011) ‘The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes: Comparing and Contrasting Findings from Quantitative Research’ International Studies Review 13, 579–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breitmeier, H., O. R. Young and M. Zürn (2006) Analyzing International Regimes: From Case Study to Database (Cambridge: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown Weiss, E. (1993) ‘International Environmental Issues and the Ermergence of a New World Order’ Georgetown Law Journal 81, 675–710

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, B (2004) From International to World Society (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, S. R., H. A. Mooney, J. Agard, D. Capistrano, R. S. DeFries, S. Díaz, T. Dietz, A. K. Duraiappah, A. Oteng-Yeboah, H. M. Pereira, C. Perrings, W. V. Reid, J. Sarukhan, R. J. Scholes and A. Whyte (2009) ‘Science for Managing Ecosystem Services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment’ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 106, 1305–1312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cash, D. W. et al. (2006) ‘Scale and Cross-Scale Dynamics: Governance and Information in a Multilevel World’ Ecology and Society 11, 181–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chayes, A. and A. H. Chayes (1995) The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W. C. (2007) ‘Sustainability Science: A Room of its Own’ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 104, 1737–1738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coicaud, J. M. and D. Warner (eds) (2001) Ethics and International Affairs: Extent and Limits (Tokyo: UNU Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D. H. (2002) Pollution and Property: Comparing Ownership Institutions for Environmental Protection (Cambridge: Cambrdige University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, P. (2008) The Bottom Billion: Why the Poorest Countries are Failing and What can be Done about it (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Conca, K. (2006) Governing Water: Contentious Transnational Politics and Global Institution Building (Cambridge: MIT).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai, X. (2007) International Institutions and National Policies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Delmas, M. and O. R. Young (eds) (2009) Governance for the Environment: New Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, T., E. Ostrom and P. C. Stern (2003) ‘The Struggle to Govern the Commons’ Science 302, 1907–1912.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enderlein, H., S. Wälti and M. Zürn (eds) (2010) Handbook on Multi-Level Governance (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).

    Google Scholar 

  • Faude, B. and T. Gehring (unpublished) ‘Institutional Ecology and the Evolution of Broader Structures in Regime Complexes: The Trade and Environment Overlap’ (available from thomas.gehring@sowi.uni-bamberg.de).

    Google Scholar 

  • Finus, M. and S. Tjøtta (2003) ‘The Oslo Protocol on Sulfur Reducation: The Great Leap Forward?’ Journal of Public Economics 87, 2031–2048.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franck, T. M. (1990) The Power of Legitimacy among Nations (New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Franck, T. M. (1995) Fairness in International Law and Institutions (New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Galaz, V., A. Duit, K. Eckerbereg and J. Ebbesson (eds) (2010) Governance, Complexitry, and Resilience. A special issue of Global Environmental Change, 20 (3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Galaz, V., P. Olsson, T. Hahn, C. Folke and U. Svedin (2008) ‘The Problem of Fit among Biophysical Systems, Environmental and Resource Regimes, and Broader Governance Systems: Insights and Emerging Challenges’ in Institutions and Environmental Change, ed. Young, O. R., L. King and H. Schroeder (Cambridge: MIT Press), 147–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, P. M., R. O. Keohane and M. L. Levy (eds) (1993) Institutions for the Earth: Sources of Effective International Environmental Protection (Cambridge: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Helm, C. and D. Sprinz (2000) ‘Measuring the Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes’ Journal of Conflict Resolution 44, 639–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovi, J., D. Sprinz and A. Underdal (2003a) ‘The Oslo-Potsdam Solution to Measuring Regime Effectiveness: Critique, Response, and the Road Ahead’ Global Environmental Politics 3, 74–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovi, J., D. Sprinz and A. Underdal (2003b) ‘Regime Effectiveness and the Oslo-Potsdam Solution: A Rejoinder to Oran Young’ Global Environmental Politics 3, 105–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jinnah, S. (2010) ‘Overlap Management in the World Trade Organization: Secretariat Influence on Trade-Environment Politics’ Global Environmental Politics 10, 54–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, M. (2003) Global Civil Society: An Answer to War (Cambridge: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R. O. and D. G. Victor (2011) ‘The Regime Complex for Climate Change’ Perspectives on Politics 9, 7–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R. O. and E. Ostrom (eds) (1995) Local Commons and Global Interdependence (London: Sage Publications).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, S. D. (1983) ‘Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables’ in International Regimes, ed. Krasner, S. D. (Ithaca: Cornell University Press), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenton, T. M., H. Held, E. Kriegler, J. W. Hall, W. Lucht, S. Rahmstorf and H. J. Schellnhuber (2008) ‘Tipping Elements in the Earth’s Climate System’ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 105, 1786–1793.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy, T. and L. Hannah (eds) (2005) Climate Change and Biodiversity (New Haven: Yale University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. and J. P. Olsen (1998) ‘The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders’ International Organization 52, 943–969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mearsheimer, J. J. (1994/1995) ‘The False Promise of International Institutions’ International Security 19, 5–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, E., S. Andresen, E.M Carlin, J. B. Skjaerseth, A. Underdal and J. Wettestad (2002) Environmental Regime Effectiveness: Confronting Theory with Evidence (Cambridge: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. (2008) ‘Evaluating the Performance of Environmental Institutions: What to Evaluate and How to Evaluate It?’ in Institutions and Environmental Change, ed. Young, O. R., L. King and H. Schroeder (Cambridge: MIT Press), 79–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. B. (1994) International Oil Pollution at Sea: Environmental Policy and Treaty Compliance (Cambridge: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. B. (2004) ‘A Quantitative Approach to Evaluating International Environmental Regimes’ in Regime Consequences, ed. Underdal, A. and O. R. Young (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers), 121–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, J. C. and T. Sandler (1997) ‘The Voluntary Provision of a Public Good: The Case of Reduced CFC Emissions and the Montreal Protocol’ Journal of Public Economics 63, 331–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, J. S., T. Sandler and K. Sargent (1997) ‘A Tale of Two Collectives: Sulphur versus Nitrogen Oxide Emissions Reduction in Europe’ Economica 64, 281–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, J. S. (2011) The Future of Power (New York: Public Affairs).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberthür, S. (2009) ‘Interplay Management: Enhancing Environmental Policy Integration among International Institutions’ International Environmental Agreements 9, 371–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberthür, S. and O. S. Stokke (eds) (2011) Institutional Interaction and Global Environmental Change (Cambridge: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberthür, S. and T. Gehring (eds) (2006) Institutional Interaction in Global Environmental Governance: Synergy and Conflict among International and EU Policies (Cambridge: MIT).

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965) The Logic of Collective Action (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Orsini, A., J-F. Morin and O. R. Young (2013) ‘Regime Complexes: A Buzz, A Boom or a Boost for Global Governance’ Global Governance 19, 27–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2007) ‘A Diagnostic Approach for Going beyond Panaceas’ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104, 15181–15187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E., T. Dietz, N. Dolsak, P. C. Stern, S. Stonich and E. U. Weber (eds) (2002) The Drama of the Commons (Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, J., K. Conca and M. Finger (2008) The Crisis of Global Environmental Politics: Towards a New Political Economy of Sustainability (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Parson, E. A. (2003) Protecting the Ozone Layer: Science and Strategy (New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Poteete, A. R., M. A. Janssen and E. Ostrom (2010) Working Together: Collective Action, the Commons, and Multiple Methods in Practice (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, C. C. (1987) The Comparative Method (Berkeley: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, C. C. (2000) Fuzzy-Set Social Science (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Raustiala, K. and A. Slaughter (2002) ‘International Law, International Relations and Compliance’ in Handbook of International Relations, ed. Carlsnaes, W., T. Risse and B. A. Simmons (London: Sage Publications), 538–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raustiala, K. and D. G. Victor (2004) ‘The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources’ International Organization 55, 277–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W. (1962) The Theory of Political Coalitions (New Haven: Yale University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringquist, E. J. and T. Kostadinova (2005) ‘Assessing the Effectiveness of International Environmental Agreements: The Case of the 1985 Helsinki Protocol’ American Journal of Political Science 49, 86–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudel, T. K. (2005) Tropical Forests: Regional Paths of Destruction and Regeneration in the Late 20th Century (New York: W. W. Norton).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T. C. (1978) Micromotives and Macrobehavior (New York: W. W. Norton).

    Google Scholar 

  • Skjaerseth, J. B. (2000) North Sea Cooperation: Linking International and Domestic Pollution Control (Manchester: Manchester University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Skjaerseth, J. B., O. S. Stokke and J. Wettestad (2006) ‘Soft Law, Hard Law, and Effective Implementation of International Environmental Norms’ Global Environmental Politics 6, 104–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speth, J. G. (2004) Red Sky at Morning: America and the Crisis of Global Government (New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, D. (1997) Pasteur’s Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovations (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokke, O. S. (2001) The Interplay of International Regimes: Putting Effectiveness Theory to Work, Report No. 14 (Lysaker, Norway: Nansen Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokke, O. S. (2004) ‘Boolean Analysis, Mechanisms, and the Study of Regime Effectiveness’ in Regime Consequences, ed. Underdal, A. and O. R. Young (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers), 87–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokke, O. S. (2011) ‘Interplay Management: Niche Selection, and Arctic Environmental Governance’ in Instiutional Interaction and Global Environmental Change, ed. Oberthür, S. and O. S. Stokke (Cambridge: MIT Press), 143–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokke, O. S. (2012) Disaggregating International Regimes: A New Approach to Evaluation and Comparison (Cambridge: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Strange, S. (1982) ‘Cave! hic dragones: A Critique of Regime Analysis’ International Organization 36, 479–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underdal, A. (2002) ‘One Question: Two Answers’ in International Regime Effectiveness, ed. Miles, E. L., S. Andresen, E. M. Carlin, J. B. Skjaerseth, A. Underdal and J. Wettestad (Cambridge: MIT Press), 3–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underdal, A. (2008) ‘Determining the Causal Significance of Institutions: Accomplishments and Challenges’ in Institutions and Environmental Change, ed. Young, O. R., L. King and H. Schroeder (Cambridge: MIT Press), 49–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underdal, A. (2010) ‘Complexity and Challenges of Long-term Environmental Governance’ Global Environmental Change 20, 386–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underdal, A. and O. R. Young (eds) (2004) Regime Consequences: Methodological Challenges and Research Strategies (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  • Velders, G. J. M., S. O. Andersen, J. S. Daniel, D. W. Fahey and M. McFarland (2007) ‘The Importance of the Montreal Protocol in Protecting Climate’ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104, 4814–4819.

    Google Scholar 

  • Victor, D. G. (2011) Global Warming Gridlock: Creating More Effective Strategies for Protecting the Planet (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Victor, D. G., K. Raustiala and E. B. Skolnikoff (eds) (1998) The Implementation and Effectiveness of International Environmental Commitments (Cambridge: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wapner, P. (1997) ‘Governance in Global Civil Society’ in Global Governance, ed. Young, O. R. (Cambridge: MIT Press), 65–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wettestad, J. (2002) Clearing the Air — European Advances in Tackling Acid Rain and Atmospheric Pollution (Aldershot: Ashgate).

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, O. R. (2014) ‘Does Fairness Matter in International Environmental Governance? Creating an Effective and Equitable Climate Regime’ in To wards a New Climate Agreement, ed. Cherry, T., J. Hovi and D. McEvoy (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, O. R. (1979) Compliance and Public Authority: A Theory with International Applications (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, O. R. (1999a) Governance in World Affairs (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, O. R. (ed.) (1999b) The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes: Causal Connections and Behavioral Mechanisms (Cambridge: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, O. R. (2002a) The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change: Fit, Interplay, and Scale (Cambridge: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, O. R. (2002b) ‘Are Institutions Intervening Variables or Basic Causal Forces? Causal Clusters vs Causal Chains in International Society’ in Millennium Reflections on International Studies, ed. Brecher, M. and F. Harvey (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press), 176–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, O. R. (2003) ‘Determining Regime Effectiveness: A Comment on the OsloPotsdam Solution’ Global Environmental Politics 3, 97–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, O. R. (2005) ‘Why Is There No Unified Theory of Environmental Governance?’ in Handbook of Global Environmental Politics, ed. Dauvergne, P. (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar), 170–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, O. R. (2008) ‘Building Regimes for Socioecological Systems: Institutional Diagnostics’ in Institutions and Environmental Change, ed. Young, O. R., L. King and H. Schroeder (Cambridge: MIT Press), 115–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, O. R. (2010) Institutional Dynamics: Emergent Patterns in International Environmental Governance (Cambridge: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, O. R. (2012) ‘Navigating the Sustainability Transition’ in Global Environmental Commons, ed. Brousseau, E., T. Dedeurwadere, P. A. Jouvet and M. Willinger (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 80–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, O. R. (2013) ‘Sugaring Off: Enduring Insights from Long-term Research on Environmental Governance’ International Environmental Agreements 13, 87–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, O. R., A. Agrawal, L. A. King, P. H. Sand, A. Underdal, and M. Wasson (1999/2005) Institutional Dimensions of Global Environmental Change IHDP Reports 9 and 16 (Bonn: IHDP).

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, O. R. et al. (2006) ‘A Portfolio Approach to Analyzing Complex HumanEnvironment Interactions: Institutions and Land Use’ Ecology and Society 11 (article 31).

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, O. R., L. King and H. Schroeder (eds) (2008) Institutions and Environmental Change: Principal Findings, Applications, and Research Frontiers (Cambridge: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaelke, Z., D. Kaniaru and E. Kružiková (eds) (2005) Making Law Work: Environmental Compliance and Sustainable Development, 2 volumes (London: Cameron May).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelli, F. and H. van Asselt (2013) ‘Introduction. The Institutional Fragmentation of Global Environmental Governance: Causes, Consequences, and Responses’ Global Environmental Politics 13, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Oran R. Young
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Colorado State University, USA

    Michele M. Betsill (Professor) & Dimitris Stevis (Professor) (Professor) &  (Professor)

  2. University of Waterloo, Canada

    Kathryn Hochstetler (Professor) (Professor)

Copyright information

© 2014 Oran R. Young

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Young, O.R. (2014). The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes: Existing Knowledge, Cutting-edge Themes, and Research Strategies. In: Betsill, M.M., Hochstetler, K., Stevis, D. (eds) Advances in International Environmental Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137338976_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation