Advertisement

Espiritismo Digital in Cyberfiction from Brazil

  • Edward King

Abstract

A particularly striking dimension of the novels referred to by de Sousa Causo and Ginway as Tupinipunk, is their blend of neoliberal fantasies of disembodiment with concepts of immaterial, spiritual bodies proposed by the espiritista sciences during the late nineteenth century in Brazil. The description of the cyborg bodies in the novels and short stories evokes the imagery of the electromagnetic body, the body understood in terms of electromagnetic flows. In one respect, this is a return to a tradition within science fiction (or, the fictional writing that critics such as de Sousa Causo and Haywood Ferreira have “retro-labeled” science fiction) that is as old as the history and prehistory of the genre in Brazil. Some of the first novels that can be usefully viewed in terms of early science fiction, including Brazil 2000 (1869) by Joaquim Felício dos Santos and O doutor Benignus (1875) by Augusto Emílio Zaluar, discuss ideas from magnetism and spiritism. De Sousa Causo, borrowing Roberto Schwarz’s formulation, argues that the strong presence of espiritismo in these texts, although heavily influenced by the writings of the French spiritist and science fiction author Camille Flammarion, points to the fact that the scientific ideas that drive the genre were “out of place” in Brazil at the end of the nineteenth century and that science and technology had little relevance for authors such as Zaluar.1

Keywords

Short Story Science Fiction Social Body Spirit Science Popular Religion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Roberto de Sousa Causo, Ficção Científica, fantasía e horror no Brasil, 1875 a 1950 (Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG, 2003), 131.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    William Gibson, Mona Lisa Overdrive (London: HarperCollins, 1995 [1988]), 111.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    Paula Sibilia, El hombre postorgánico: Cuerpo, subjetividad y tecnologías digitales (Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica de Argentina, 2009), 159.Google Scholar
  4. 8.
    Sherryl Vint and Mark Bould, “All that Melts into Air is Solid: Rematerialising Capital in Cube and Videodrome,” Journal of the Research Group on Socialism and Democracy 42 (2011).Google Scholar
  5. 9.
    Erik Davis, TechGnosis: Myth, Magic and Mysticism in the Age of Information (London: Serpents Tail, 1999), 179. Mark Dery puts forward a similar argument. The spirituality of the 1960s Bay Area counter-culture, Dery argues, “may have dreamed of enlightenment, but their’s was the ‘plug-and-play’ nirvana of the ‘gadget-happy American’—cosmic consciousness on demand”; Escape Velocity (New York: Grove Press, 1996), 29. The focus on healing and drug use treated the body as a spiritual tool through which to tinker with the soul. According to Dery, the “pick ‘n’ mix” spiritualism of the 1960s, which constituted the seedbed for the emergence of cybercultural discourses in the United States, was not a mode of resistance to the technologization of social life but rather an expression of this technologization.Google Scholar
  6. 10.
    Zygmunt Bauman, “Postmodern Religion?,” in Religion, Modernity, and Postmodernity ed. Paul Heelas (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 1998), 70.Google Scholar
  7. 13.
    Elizabeth M. Ginway, “Do Implantado ao Ciborgue: O Corpo Social Na Ficção Científica Brasileira,” Revista Iberoamericana 73:221 (2007), 787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 14.
    Renato Ortiz, A Moderna tradiçã o brasileira: Cultura brasileira e industria cultural (São Paulo: Editora Brasiliense, 1988), 158. Marilena Chaui describes a curious reversal in contemporary Brazilian consumer culture in which technology and science are mystified and presented as magic, and the magical procedures of spiritualism are presented as a science: “em uma inversão, verdadeiramente fantástica, as descobertas científicas e técnicas são apresentadas como se fossem obra de magia … a magia aparece como ciência”; Simulacro e poder: Uma análise da mídia (São Paulo: Editora Fundação Perseu Abramo, 2007), 18. Chaui’s dismissive tone glosses over the interesting dialogue between scientific discourse and New Ageism in Brazil that the Tupinipunk texts serve to elucidate.Google Scholar
  9. 15.
    Pedro Alexandre Sanches, Tropicalismo: decadência bonita do samba (São Paulo: Boitempo Editorial, 2000), 25.Google Scholar
  10. 17.
    Leila Amaral, “Umespírito sem lar: sobre uma dimensão ‘nova era’ da religiosidade contemporânea,” in Circuitos infinitos: Comparações ereligiões no Brasil, Argentina, Portugal, Françae Grã-Bretanha ed. Otávio Guilherme Velho (São Paulo: Attar Editorial, 2003), 20.Google Scholar
  11. 21.
    David J. Hess, “Religion, Heterodox Science and Brazilian Culture,” Social Studies of Science 17:3 (1987), 466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 22.
    Diana Brown, Umbanda: Religion and Politics in Urban Brazil (Ann Arbor, MI: Umi Research Press, 1986), 17.Google Scholar
  13. 23.
    Paul Gilmore, “Romantic Electricity, or the Materiality of Aesthetics,” American Literature 76:3 (2004), 480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 27.
    Erik Davis, “Spiritual Telegraphs and the Technology of Communication: Tuning into the Electromagnetic Imagination,” (1997) http://nonstop-future.org/txt?tid=96beaefe6ab7ca2db5210934b23c705a [accessed July 27, 2011].Google Scholar
  15. 29.
    Quoted in Ubiratan Machado, Os intelectuais e o espiritismo: De Castro Alves a Machado de Assis (Rio de Janeiro: Edicões Antares, 1983), 106.Google Scholar
  16. 30.
    Sheri Weinstein, “Technologies of Vision: Spiritualism and Science in the Nineteenth-Century American Imagination,” in Spectral America: Phantoms and the National Imagination ed. Jeffrey Andrew Weinstock (London: The University of Wisconsin Press, 2004), 127.Google Scholar
  17. 31.
    Susanna Rostas and André Droogers, The Popular Uses of Popular Religion in Latin America (Amsterdam: CEDLA, 1993), 5.Google Scholar
  18. 32.
    Gibson, Count Zero (London: HarperCollins, 1995 [1986]), 111.Google Scholar
  19. 33.
    Hess, “Parallel Universes: Anthropology in the World of Technoscience,” Anthropology Today 10:2 (1994), 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 34.
    Sarlo, Una modernidad periférica: Buenos Aires 1920 y 1930 (Buenos Aires: Ediciones Nueva Vision, 1999), 52.Google Scholar
  21. 37.
    Jay Clayton, Charles Dickens in Cyberspace: The Afterlife of the Nineteenth Century in Postmodern Culture (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), 8.Google Scholar
  22. 41.
    Martha J. Reineke, Sacrificed Lives: Kristeva on Women and Violence (Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1997), 113.Google Scholar
  23. 45.
    Lidia Santos, Tropical Kitsch: Mass Media in Latin American Art and Literature trans. Elisabeth Enenbach (Princeton, NJ: Markus Wiener Publishers, 2006), 63–64.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Edward King 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward King

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations