Skip to main content

Company Adrift — Inertia, Organizational Games and Unsure Leaders

  • Chapter
  • 202 Accesses

Abstract

Only leaders have the right to make key strategic choices. This is a result of their legitimization as representatives of the owners or founders of the organization, as well as from the right to take decisions given to management boards, accompanied by their accountability. Regardless of how much (and how correctly) we underline the creative and important role of an organization’s participants in the development of strategy, especially in modern companies based on knowledge, the fact is that management boards, not employees, are accountable for creating strategy and final choices. Leaders can carry out this task on their own, delegate it toward lower hierarchical levels or toward a dedicated strategy team or unit. They can and should commit participants to processes of gathering information, its interpretation and formulating alternative actions. They can also come to a conclusion that strategy is not needed at all and that it is enough to control costs, keep production and sales process flexible and periodically adjust to changes that are impossible to avoid or neglect. But then again, opting for a lack of strategy is also a key choice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Inertia is a very extensively studied topic. See: M. W. Meyer and L. G. Zucker (1989) Permanently Failing Organizations, Newbury Park: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. Miller (1990) The Icarus Paradox: How Exceptional Companies Bring About Their Own Fall, New York: Harper Collins

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. L. Amburgey (1991) ‘Organizational Inertia and Momentum: A Dynamic Model of Strategic Change’, Academy of Management Journal, 34, 591–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. C. K. Prahalad and R. A. Bettis (1986) ‘The Dominant Logic: A New Linkage between Diversity and Performance’, Strategic Management Journal, 7, 485–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. J. P. Walsh (1995) ‘Managerial and Organizational Cognition: Notes from a Trip Down Memory Lane’, Organizational Science, 6, 280–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. T. Obloj, K. Obloj and M. Pratt (2010) ‘Dominant Logic and Entrepreneurial Firms Performance in a Transitional Market’, Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 34, 151–70.

    Google Scholar 

  7. W.W. Powell (2000) ‘The Sources of Managerial Logics’, in J. A. Baum and F. Dobbin, Economics Meets Sociology in Strategic Management, Stamford: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. The analysis is based upon an Mary Tripsas and Giovanni Gavetti (2000) ‘Capabilities, Cognition and Inertia: Evidence from Digital Imaging’, Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1147–61 and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polaroid_ Corporation, accessed November 17, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mary Tripsas and Giovanni Gavetti (2000) ‘Capabilities, Cognition and Inertia: Evidence from Digital Imaging’, Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1147–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J. Bogle (2009) Enough: True Measures of Money, Business, and Life, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Nelson and S. Winter (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Boston: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. G. March (1996) ‘Continuity and Change in Theories of Organizational Action’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 278–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. S. Nadkarni and P. D. Perez (2007) ‘Prior Commitments and Early International Commitment: The Mediating Role of Domestic Mindset’, Journal of International Business Studies, 38, 160–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. I. Nonaka and H. Takeuchi (1995) The Knowledge Creating Company, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Crozier (1964) The Bureaucratic Phenomena, Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. K. Obloj and P. Joynt (1985) ‘An Empirical Study of Innovative Behaviour in Poland’ in P. Joynt and M. Warner Managing in Different Cultures, Oslo: Universitetsforlaget

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. K. Kozminski and K. Obloj (1983) Gry o innowacje (Game for innovations), Warsaw: PWE.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. A. Burgelman and A. S. Grove (2007) ‘Let Chaos Reign, then Rein in Chaos — Repeatedly: Managing Strategic Dynamics for Corporate Longevity’, Strategic Management Journal, 28, 972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. R. A. Burgelman and A. S. Grove (2007) ‘Let Chaos Reign, then Rein in Chaos — Repeatedly: Managing Strategic Dynamics for Corporate Longevity’, Strategic Management Journal, 28, 973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. J. G. March and T. Weil (2005) On Leadership, Oxford: Blackwell, 11

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. J. Hatch, M. Kostera and A. K. Kozminski (2005) The Three Faces of Leadership: Manager, Artist, Priest, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  22. J.P. Kotter (2001) ‘What Leaders Really Do’, Harvard Business Review, December, 85–96; J. P. Kotter (1998) Leadership Factor, New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. S. Lem (1973) Invincible, London: Sidgwick and Jackson.

    Google Scholar 

  24. S. Lem (1968) Solaris. Niezwyciezony, Krakow: Wydawnictwo Literackie, 323–4

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2013 Krzysztof Obloj

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Obloj, K. (2013). Company Adrift — Inertia, Organizational Games and Unsure Leaders. In: The Passion and Discipline of Strategy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137334947_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics