Abstract
Only leaders have the right to make key strategic choices. This is a result of their legitimization as representatives of the owners or founders of the organization, as well as from the right to take decisions given to management boards, accompanied by their accountability. Regardless of how much (and how correctly) we underline the creative and important role of an organization’s participants in the development of strategy, especially in modern companies based on knowledge, the fact is that management boards, not employees, are accountable for creating strategy and final choices. Leaders can carry out this task on their own, delegate it toward lower hierarchical levels or toward a dedicated strategy team or unit. They can and should commit participants to processes of gathering information, its interpretation and formulating alternative actions. They can also come to a conclusion that strategy is not needed at all and that it is enough to control costs, keep production and sales process flexible and periodically adjust to changes that are impossible to avoid or neglect. But then again, opting for a lack of strategy is also a key choice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Inertia is a very extensively studied topic. See: M. W. Meyer and L. G. Zucker (1989) Permanently Failing Organizations, Newbury Park: Sage
D. Miller (1990) The Icarus Paradox: How Exceptional Companies Bring About Their Own Fall, New York: Harper Collins
T. L. Amburgey (1991) ‘Organizational Inertia and Momentum: A Dynamic Model of Strategic Change’, Academy of Management Journal, 34, 591–612.
C. K. Prahalad and R. A. Bettis (1986) ‘The Dominant Logic: A New Linkage between Diversity and Performance’, Strategic Management Journal, 7, 485–501
J. P. Walsh (1995) ‘Managerial and Organizational Cognition: Notes from a Trip Down Memory Lane’, Organizational Science, 6, 280–320
T. Obloj, K. Obloj and M. Pratt (2010) ‘Dominant Logic and Entrepreneurial Firms Performance in a Transitional Market’, Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 34, 151–70.
W.W. Powell (2000) ‘The Sources of Managerial Logics’, in J. A. Baum and F. Dobbin, Economics Meets Sociology in Strategic Management, Stamford: JAI Press.
The analysis is based upon an Mary Tripsas and Giovanni Gavetti (2000) ‘Capabilities, Cognition and Inertia: Evidence from Digital Imaging’, Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1147–61 and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polaroid_ Corporation, accessed November 17, 2012.
Mary Tripsas and Giovanni Gavetti (2000) ‘Capabilities, Cognition and Inertia: Evidence from Digital Imaging’, Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1147–61.
J. Bogle (2009) Enough: True Measures of Money, Business, and Life, New York: Wiley.
R. Nelson and S. Winter (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Boston: Harvard University Press
J. G. March (1996) ‘Continuity and Change in Theories of Organizational Action’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 278–87
S. Nadkarni and P. D. Perez (2007) ‘Prior Commitments and Early International Commitment: The Mediating Role of Domestic Mindset’, Journal of International Business Studies, 38, 160–76.
I. Nonaka and H. Takeuchi (1995) The Knowledge Creating Company, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
M. Crozier (1964) The Bureaucratic Phenomena, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
K. Obloj and P. Joynt (1985) ‘An Empirical Study of Innovative Behaviour in Poland’ in P. Joynt and M. Warner Managing in Different Cultures, Oslo: Universitetsforlaget
A. K. Kozminski and K. Obloj (1983) Gry o innowacje (Game for innovations), Warsaw: PWE.
R. A. Burgelman and A. S. Grove (2007) ‘Let Chaos Reign, then Rein in Chaos — Repeatedly: Managing Strategic Dynamics for Corporate Longevity’, Strategic Management Journal, 28, 972.
R. A. Burgelman and A. S. Grove (2007) ‘Let Chaos Reign, then Rein in Chaos — Repeatedly: Managing Strategic Dynamics for Corporate Longevity’, Strategic Management Journal, 28, 973.
J. G. March and T. Weil (2005) On Leadership, Oxford: Blackwell, 11
M. J. Hatch, M. Kostera and A. K. Kozminski (2005) The Three Faces of Leadership: Manager, Artist, Priest, Oxford: Blackwell.
J.P. Kotter (2001) ‘What Leaders Really Do’, Harvard Business Review, December, 85–96; J. P. Kotter (1998) Leadership Factor, New York: The Free Press.
S. Lem (1973) Invincible, London: Sidgwick and Jackson.
S. Lem (1968) Solaris. Niezwyciezony, Krakow: Wydawnictwo Literackie, 323–4
Copyright information
© 2013 Krzysztof Obloj
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Obloj, K. (2013). Company Adrift — Inertia, Organizational Games and Unsure Leaders. In: The Passion and Discipline of Strategy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137334947_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137334947_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-46284-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-33494-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)