Abstract
Antonio Gramsci’s rich reflections on the concepts of hegemony, ideology and political strategy have provided much inspiration for social theorists and analysts working in various traditions and fields.1 The latter include developments in international political economy, cultural studies, sociology, organization theory, literary theory and political philosophy.2 This chapter focuses on the work of Laclau and Mouffe, as well as other proponents of the Essex school of discourse analysis who have sought to elaborate a post-Marxist interpretation of Gramsci’s work. Such scholars have combined Gramsci’s reflections of hegemony, with more recent developments in critical theory (such as structural Marxism, genealogy and psychoanalysis) to engage in a wider deconstruction of the Marxist tradition, thereby laying the basis for a distinctive approach to the analysis of ideology and politics.3 The goal of the chapter is to explore the way Laclau and Mouffe’s ideas about hegemony, subjectivity and power can supplement other neo-Gramscian accounts of the state, ideology and international political economy. But it also seeks to provide a way of operationalizing these abstract concepts and logics so as to develop critical explanations of problematized phenomena in the national and international context.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See David Howarth, Discourse (Buckingham: Open University Press, 2000);
David Howarth, ‘Discourse, Hegemony and Populism: Ernesto Laclau’s Political Theory,’ in Ernesto Laclau: Post-Marxism, Populism, and Critique, ed. David Howarth (London: Routledge, 2014), 1–20.
See Robert W. Cox, ‘Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory,’ Millennium 10 (1981), 126–55;
Robert W. Cox, Production, Power and World Order (New York: Columbia University Press, 1987);
Stephen Gill, Power and Resistance in the New World Order (London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008);
Stephen Gill and David Law, The Global Political Economy: Perspectives, Problems and Policies (Brighton: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1988);
Bob Jessop, The Capitalist State: Marxist Theories and Methods (Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1982);
Bob Jessop, State Theory (Cambridge: Polity, 1990).
See for example: Simon Critchley and Oliver Marchart, eds., Laclau: A Critical Reader (London: Palgrave, 2004);
Glyn Daly, ‘The Discursive Construction of Economic Space,’ Economy and Society 20 (1991), 79–102;
Luis R. Davila, ‘The Rise and Fall and Rise of Populism in Venezuela,’ Bulletin of Latin American Research 19 (2000), 223–38;
Torben Dyrberg, The Circular Structure of Power (London: Verso, 1997);
Jason Glynos, ‘The Grip of Ideology,’ Journal of Political Ideologies 6 (2001), 191–214;
Jason Glynos, ‘Self-Transgression and Freedom,’ Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6 (2003), 1–20;
Jason Glynos and David Howarth, Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory (London: Routledge, 2007);
Stephen Griggs and David Howarth, ‘Populism, Localism and Environmental Politics: The Logic and Rhetoric of the Stop Stansted Expansion Campaign in the United Kingdom,’ Planning Theory 7 (2008), 123–44;
Stephen Griggs and David Howarth, The Politics of Airport Expansion in the United Kingdom: Hegemony, Policy and the Rhetoric of ‘Sustainable Aviation’ (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2013);
David Howarth, ‘Populism or Popular Democracy?,’ in Populism and the Mirror of Nature, ed. Francisco Panizza (London: Verso, 2005), 202–23;
David Howarth, ‘Space, Subjectivity and Politics,’ Alternatives 31 (2006), 105–34;
David Howarth, Aletta J. Norval and Yannis Stavrakakis, eds., Discourse Theory and Political Analysis (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000);
Mark McNally, ‘The Organization of Balance and Equilibrium in Gramsci’s Hegemony,’ History of Political Thought 29 (2008), 662–89;
Oliver Marchart, Post-foundational Political Thought (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2007);
Aletta J. Norval, ‘Hegemony after Deconstruction: the Consequences of Undecidability,’ Journal of Political Ideologies 9 (1994), 139–57;
Aletta J. Norval, ‘Social Ambiguity and the Crisis of Apartheid,’ in The Making of Political Identities, ed. Ernesto Laclau (London: Verso, 1994), 115–37;
Aletta J. Norval, Deconstructing Apartheid Discourse (London: Verso, 1999);
Francisco Panizza, ed., Populism and the Mirror of Nature (London: Verso, 2005);
Anna M. Smith, New Right Discourse on Race and Sexuality: Britain 1968–1990 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994);
Ulrich Stäheli, ‘Decentering the Economy: Governmentality Studies and Beyond,’ in Governmentality: Current Issues and Future Challenges, ed. Ulrich Bröckling, Susanne Krasmann and Thomas Lemke (London: Routledge, 2012), 269–84;
Yannis Stavrakakis, Lacan and the Political (London: Routledge, 1999);
Yannis Stavrakakis, ‘Passions of Identification,’ in Discourse Theory in European Politics, ed. David Howarth and Jacob Torfing (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005), 68–92;
Yannis Stavrakakis, The Lacanian Left (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2007);
Jacob Torfing, Politics, Regulation and the Modern Welfare State (London: Macmillan, 1998);
Jacob Torfing, New Theories of Discourse: Laclau, Mouffe and Zizek (Oxford: Blackwell Smith, 1999).
See Jonathan Davies, Challenging Governance Theory (Bristol: Policy Press, 2011);
Jonathan Joseph, Hegemony: A Realist Analysis (London: Routledge, 2002);
Jonathan Joseph, Marxism and Social Theory (London: Palgrave, 2006);
Peter Thomas, The Gramscian Moment: Philosophy, Hegemony and Marxism (London: Haymarket, 2011), 11n, 57n, 259–62.
see Louis Althusser, For Marx (London: Verso, 1969);
Louis Althusser, Lenin and Philosophy, and other Essays (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1971);
Nicos Poulantzas, Political Power and Social Classes (London: New Left Books, 1973).
See for example: Christine Buci-Glucksmann, Gramsci and the State, trans. David Fernbach (London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1980);
Joseph Femia, Gramsci’s Political Thought: Hegemony, Consciousness and the Revolutionary Process (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1981);
Norberto Bobbio, ‘Gramsci and the Concept of Civil Society,’ in Gramsci and Marxist Theory, ed. Chantal Mouffe (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1979), 21–47;
Norberto Bobbio, Which Socialism? Marxism, Socialism and Democracy, trans. Roger Griffin (Manchester: Polity Press, 1987);
For example, Richard J.F. Day, Gramsci Is Dead (London: Pluto Press, 2005);
Jon Beasley-Murray, Posthegemony: Political Theory and Latin America (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2010).
Karl Marx, ‘Preface to a Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy,’ in Karl Marx: Selected Writings, ed. David McLellan (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997), 424–7.
Perry Anderson, ‘The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci,’ New Left Review 100 (1976–7), 5–78;
Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, ed. and trans. Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell Smith (London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1971), 181–2.
See Ernesto Laclau, New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time (London: Verso, 1990);
See Ernesto Laclau, On Populist Reason (London, Verso, 2005);
Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe, ‘Post-Marxism without Apologies,’ New Left Review 166 (1987), 79–106.
Robert W. Cox, ‘A Perspective on Globalization,’ in Globalization: Critical Reflections, ed. James H. Mittelman (Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1996), 21–30;
Robert Keohane, After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984).
Laclau, Politics and Ideology in Marxist Theory (London: Verso, 1977);
See William E. Connolly, ‘The Evangelical—Capitalist Resonance Machine,’ Political Theory 33 (2005), 869–86;
William E. Connolly, Capitalism and Christianity, American Style (Durham: Duke University Press, 2008).
Ernesto Laclau, Emancipation(s) (London: Verso, 1996);
Ernesto Laclau, ‘Identity and Hegemony,’ in Contingency, Hegemony, Universality, ed. Judith Butler, Ernesto Laclau and Slavoj Žižek (London: Verso, 2000), 44–89;
Slavoj Žižek, The Sublime Object of Ideology (London: Verso, 1989);
Slavoj Zižek, The Ticklish Subject (London: Verso, 1999).
Ernesto Laclau, ‘Why Do Empty Signifiers Matter to Politics?’ in The Greater Evil and the Lesser Good, ed. Jeffrey Weeks (London: Rivers Oram, 1995), 167–78.
Ernesto Laclau, ‘Reply,’ in Laclau: A Critical Reader, ed. Critchley and Marchart (London: Routledge, 1994), 322;
Norman Geras, ‘Post-Marxism?’ New Left Review 1/163 (1987), 40–82;
Norman Geras, ‘Ex-Marxism without Substance,’ New Left Review 1/169 (1988), 34–61;
Peter Osborne, ‘Radicalism without Limit,’ in Socialism and the Limits of Liberalism, ed. Peter Osborne (London: Verso, 1991), 201–25.
See David Howarth, Poststructuralism and After: Structure, Agency and Power (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013).
Marten Hajer, The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995).
David Howarth, ‘Discourse, Power, and Policy: Articulating a Hegemony Approach to Critical Policy Studies,’ Critical Policy Studies 3 (2010), 317.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 David Howarth
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Howarth, D. (2015). Gramsci, Hegemony and Post-Marxism. In: McNally, M. (eds) Antonio Gramsci. Critical Explorations in Contemporary Political Thought. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137334183_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137334183_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-55365-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-33418-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political Science CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)