Abstract
During recent decades, the problem of’ social exclusion’ has been widely discussed in Europe. Since the early 1990s, when the term first came to prominence in France, it has rapidly gained currency as a key word in a transnational debate on the new challenges faced by highly developed Western societies — a debate that prompted the European Union to proclaim 2010 the ‘European Year for Combating Poverty and Social Exclusion’.1 Although modern welfare states have produced a level of affluence unprecedented in history, symptoms of erosion are apparent. The oft-deplored crisis of the welfare state has many different facets, and many causes have been identified. Yet there is a widely- shared assumption that economic factors such as high rates of unemployment and the financial overburdening of social insurance systems cannot alone be blamed. Rather, social exclusion has a cultural side as well. The established mechanisms of social inclusion seem especially to be failing to have an effect on groups on the margins of society that are not only materially disadvantaged but are also in some way ‘deviant’. The welfare state aims at inclusion, but has difficulty including groups who do not think, behave and live as the ‘normal’ citizen does. So social exclusion is, at least in part, related to a (perceived) lack of adaptation to dominant cultural attitudes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
For an account of the periodic reappearance of this concern over the past century in Britain and the USA, see J. Welshman (2006) Underclass: A History of the Excluded, 1880–2000 (London: Hambledon Continuum).
For overviews, see D. Downes and P. Rock (2011) Understanding Deviance: A Guide to the Sociology of Crime and Rule-Breaking, 6th edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
A. Thio (2010) Deviant behavior, 10th edition (Boston: Allyn & Bacon)
H. Peters (2009) Devianz und soziale Kontrolle. Eine Einführung in die Soziologie abweichenden Verhaltens, 3rd edition (Weinheim: Juventa).
S. and B. Webb (eds.) (1909) The Break-Up of the Poor Law: BeingPart One of the Minority Report of the Poor Law Commission (London: Longmans)
D.T. Rodgers (1998) Atlantic Crossings: Social Politics in a Progressive Age (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press).
P. Strauss (1897) ‘Notre programme’, Revue Philanthropique, 1, 1–8, quoted in A. Mitchell (1991) The Divided Path: the German Influence on Social Reform in France after 1870 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press), p. 93.
See, among others, W.J. Mommsen and W. Mock (eds.) (1981) The Emergence of the Welfare State in Britain and Germany, 1850–1950 (London: Croom Helm)
CA. Ritter (1986) Social Welfare in Germany and Britain: Origins and Development (Leamington Spa: Berg)
M.B. Katz and C. Sachße (eds.) (1996) The Mixed Economy of Social Welfare: Public/Private Relations in England, Germany and the United States, the 1870s to the 1930s (Baden-Baden: Nomos)
E.P. Hennock (2007) The Origin of the Welfare State in England and Germany, 1850–1914: Social Policies Compared (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
H. Beck (1995) The Origins of the Authoritarian Welfare State in Prussia: Conservatives, Bureaucracy, and the Social Question, 1815–1870 (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press)
E. Reidegeld (1996) Staatliche Sozialpolitik in Deutschland. Historische Entwicklung und theoretische Analyse von den Ursprüngen bis 1918 (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag)
L. Machtan (ed.) (1994) Bismarcks Sozialstaat. Beitrâge zur Geschichte der Sozialpolitik und zur sozialpolitischen Geschichtsschreibung (Frankfurt: Campus).
C. Sachße and F. Tennstedt (eds.) (1986) Soziale Sicherheit und soziale Disziplinierung. Beitrâge zu einer historischen Theorie der Sozialpolitik (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp).
M.B. Adams (ed.) (1990) The Wellborn Science: Eugenics in Germany, France, Brazil, and Russia (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
G. Broberg and N. Roll-Hansen (eds.) (1996) Eugenics and the Welfare State: Sterilization Policy in Denmark, Sweden, Norway, and Finland (East Lansing: Michigan State University Press)
S. Kühl (1997) Die Internationale der Rassisten: Aufstieg und Niedergang der internationalen Bewegung für Eugenik und Rassenhygiene im 20. Jahrhundert (Frankfurt: Campus)
R. Wecker et al. (eds.) (2009) Wie nationalsozialistisch ist die Eugenik? Internationale Debatten zur Geschichte der Eugenik im 20. Jahrhundert I What is National Socialist about Eugenics? International Debates on the History of Eugenics in the 20th Century (Weimar: Böhlau)
M. Turda (2010) Modernism and Eugenics (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
W. H. Dawson (1910) The Vagrancy Problem. The Case for Measures of Restraint for Tramps, Loafers, and Unemployables: With a Study of Continental Detention Colonies and Labour Houses (London: P.S. King), p. 249.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Beate Althammer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Althammer, B. (2014). Introduction: Poverty and Deviance in the Era of the Emerging Welfare State. In: Althammer, B., Gestrich, A., Gründler, J. (eds) The Welfare State and the ‘Deviant Poor’ in Europe, 1870–1933. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137333629_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137333629_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-46229-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-33362-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)