Abstract
This chapter explores the ethics of gifted people in science with a special emphasis on a” hacker ethic.” Gifted students and professionals in science create new ideas and products that can be used in the benefit of our society. However, the creative process in science includes many ethical issues that need to be considered before publishing the new idea or the product. Combining excellence with ethics relates to ethical models developed in the academic context, such as Pekka Himanen’s theoretical approach to the hacker ethic. In his work, Himanen (2001) introduced a new kind of ethic, the” hacker work ethic,” which has replaced the dominance of the Protestant work ethic with a passionate attitude and relationship to one’s work. With the word” hackers,” he referred to people who did their work because of intrinsic interest, excitement, and joy, whereas the Protestant work ethic emphasized work as a duty and a calling. The successful scientists resemble the hackers with their strong inner drive to excel (Koro-Ljungberg & Tirri, 2002; Tirri & Campbell, 2002).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Albrecht, K. (2006). Social Intelligence: The New Science of Success. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Andreani, O., & Pagnin, A. (1993). Nurturing the moral development of the gifted. In K. Heller, R Monks, & H. Passow (eds.), International Handbook of Research and Development of Giftedness and Talent (pp. 539–553). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Bebeau, M., Rest, J., & Narvaez, D. (1999). Beyond the promise: A perspective on research in moral education. Educational Researcher, 28(4), 18–26.
Bebeau, M., Rest, J., & Yamoor, C. (1985). Measuring dental students’ ethical sensitivity. Journal of Dental Education, 49(4), 225–235.
Brabeck, M., Rogers, L., Sirin, S., Handerson, J., Ting, K., & Benvenuto, M. (2000). Increasing ethical sensitivity to racial and gender intolerance in schools: Development of the racial ethical sensitivity test (REST). Ethics and behavior, 10(2), 119–137.
Gholami, K., & Tirri, K. (2012a). The cultural dependence of the ethical sensitivity scale questionnaire: The case of Iranian Kurdish teachers. Education Research International, 2012.
Gholami, K., & Tirri, K. (2012b). The teachers’ perceived dimensions of caring practice: A quantitative reflection on the moral aspect of teaching. Education Research International, 2012.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a Different Voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Goleman, D. (2006). Social Intelligence. New York: Bantam Books.
Himanen, P. (2001). The Hacker Ethic and the Spirit of the Information Age. London: Vintage.
Karnes, R, & Brown, K. (1981). Moral development and the gifted: An initial investigation. Roeper Review, 3, 8–10.
Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In D. A. Goslin (ed.), Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research (pp. 347–480). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
Koro-Ljungberg, M., & Tirri, K. (2002). Beliefs and values of successful scientists. Journal of Beliefs and Values, 23(2), 141–155.
Kuusisto, E., Tirri, K., & Rissanen, I. (2012). Finnish teachers’ ethical sensitivity. Education Research International, 2012.
Narvaez, D. (1993). High achieving students and moral judgment. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16(3), 268–279.
Narvaez, D. (2001). Ethical sensitivity: Activity booklet 1. http://www.nd.edu/ ~dnarvaez/, accessed March 2, 2007.
Noddings, N. (1999). Introduction. In M. Katz, N. Noddings, & K. Strike (eds.), Justice and Caring: The Search for Common Ground in Education (pp. 21–37). New York: Teachers College Press.
Schutte, I., Wolfersberger, M., & Tirri, K. (under review). The relationship between ethical sensitivity, high ability and gender in higher education students.
Sjoberg, S., & Schreiner, C. (2010). The ROSE Project. An Overview and Key Findings, Oslo: University olOslo.
Strike, K. (1999). Justice, caring, and universality: In defence ol moral pluralism. In M. Katz, N. Noddings, & K. Strike (eds.), Justice and Caring: The Search for Common Ground in Education (pp. 21–37). New York: Teachers College Press.
Terman, L. (1925). Genetic Studies of Genius: Vol. 1. Mental and Physical Traits of a Thousand Gifted Children. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Tirri, K. (2001). Finland Olympiad studies: What lactors contribute to the development ol academic talent in Finland? Educating Able Children, 5(2), 56–66.
Tirri, K. (2002). Developing females’ talent: Case studies ol Finnish Olympians. Journal of Research in Education, 12(1), 80–85.
Tirri, K. (2003). The moral concerns and orientations ol sixth. and ninth-grade students, Educational Research and Evaluation, 9(1), pp. 93–108.
Tirri, K. (2011). Combining excellence and ethics: Implications for moral education for the gifted. Roeper Review, 33(1), 59–64.
Tirri, K., & Campbell, J. R. (2002). Actualizing mathematical giltedness in adulthood. Educating Able Children, 6(1), 14–20.
Tirri, K., & Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2002). Critical incidents in the lives ol gifted female Finnish scientists. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 13(4), 151–162.
Tirri, K., St. Nokelainen, P. (2006). Gifted students and the future. KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 3(2), 55–66
Tirri, K., & Nokelainen, P. (2007). Comparison of academically average and gifted students’ self-rated ethical sensitivity. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13(6), 587–601.
Tirri, K., & Nokelainen, P. (2011). Measuring Multiple Intelligences and Moral Sensitivities in Education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Tirri, K., & Pehkonen, L. (2002). The moral reasoning and scientific argumentation of gifted adolescents. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 13(3), 120–129.
Tirri, K., Tallent-Runnels, M. St. Nokelainen, P. (2005). A cross-cultural study of pre-adolescents’ moral, religious and spiritual questions. British Journal of Religious Education, 27(3), 207–214.
Tirri, K., Tolppanen, S., Aksela, M., St Kuusisto, E. (2012). A cross-cultural study of gifted students’ scientific, societal, and moral questions concerning science. Educational Research International, 2012, Article ID 673645, doi:10.1155/2012/673645.
Toulmin, S. (1958). The Uses of Argument. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Kirsi Tirri
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tirri, K. (2014). The Hacker Ethic for Gifted Scientists. In: Moran, S., Cropley, D., Kaufman, J.C. (eds) The Ethics of Creativity. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137333544_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137333544_13
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-33352-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-33354-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)