Abstract
One of the key aims of this book, as set out in the introduction, was to bring epicene research up to date. Chapters 1 and 3 highlighted that previous work on epicene pronouns could not necessarily account for modern usage, as existing studies were rather old. It was hypothesised that the investigation of current usage would indicate that singular they is the epicene of choice in post-2000 written British English. Furthermore, it was also suggested that modern grammar texts would continue the trend evident in the literature and reject generic he in favour of prescribing epicene avoidance tactics. This in turn could provide positive evidence for the claim that modern grammar prescriptions would be influenced by language-external factors, such as feminism-based language reform. In order to address these hypotheses I used corpora to compare language use with language prescriptions, documenting current usage using the BE06 subcorpora and investigating whether the condemnation of singular they found in older grammars still held post-2000 in modern texts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Laura Louise Paterson
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Paterson, L.L. (2014). Accounting for Epicene Choice. In: British Pronoun Use, Prescription, and Processing. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137332738_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137332738_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-46186-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-33273-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Language & Linguistics CollectionEducation (R0)