Abstract
In many of the early treatments of Chatterton a strong source of contention concerned authorship. Even though leading scholars, principally Tyrwhitt the philologist and Warton the literary historian, had quickly realized that the texts were modern concoctions, a small band of antiquaries had stubbornly refused to relinquish the fictitious fifteenth-century priest Rowley. More than anything else, authorial decorum was at stake: the works exhibited marks of ‘classical’ genius and so demanded an appropriate figurehead. Such commentators could not bear to see them attributed to an unreliable and dissolute charity-schoolboy. Paradoxically, then, the pro-Rowleians devoted reams of print to Chatterton’s life and character in the very act of excising him from the corpus. They belittled his mock-scholarship, corrected his own glosses and brought forth his private correspondence as proof of his inadequacies of character. To put it another way: far from ignoring Chatterton the antiquaries savaged him. Yet, as we have seen, they belonged to a minority. Warton, Malone, Steevens and a whole host of critics and literary pasticheurs praised the boy-poet as a unique genius, a doyen of modern antiques and a master of a new brand of Rowleyese Englishness.
Alone, unknown, the Muses darling dies, And with the vulgar dead, unnoted lies. Bright star of genius! — torn from life and fame, My tears, my verse, shall consecrate thy name!
(Hannah Cowley)1
Too proud for pity, and too poor for praise, No voice to cherish, and no hand to raise; Torn, stung, and sated, with this ‘mortal coil,’ This weary, anxious scene of fruitless toil; Not all the graces that to youth belong, Nor all the energies of sacred song; Nor all that FANCY, all that GENIUS gave, Could snatch thy wounded spirit from the grave.
(Mary Robinson)2
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Mary Robinson, ‘Monody to the Memory of Chatterton’, Poems by Mrs. M. Robinson, 2 vols (London: J. Bell, 1791–3), vol. 1, pp. 75–9.
See Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Coleridge’s Poems: A Facsimile Reproduction, eds J. D. Campbell and W. Hale White (Westminster: A. Constable, 1899), pp. 67–8.
Ann Yearsley, ‘Elegy, on Mr. Chatterton’, Poems, on Various Subjects (London: G. G.J. and J. Robinson, 1787), pp. 145–9.
Janet Todd, Sensibility: An Introduction (London: Methuen, 1986), passim.
Barbara M. Benedict, Framing Feeling: Sentiment and Style in English Prose Fiction, 1745–1800 (New York: AMS Press, 1994), p. 1.
G.J. Barker-Benfield, The Culture of Sensibility: Sex and Society in Eighteenth-Century Britain (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992)
Paul Langford, Polite and Commercial People: England 1727–1783 (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1998 [1989])
John Mullan, Sentiment and Sociability: The Language of Feeling in the Eighteenth Century (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988).
Adam Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments (London: A. Millar, 1759), p. 9
Alexander Gerard, An Essay on Genius (London: W. Strahan and T. Cadell; Edinburgh: W. Creech, 1774), pp. 71–95
Edward Young, Conjectures on Original Composition (London: A. Millar and R. and J. Dodsley 1759), p. 73.
See William H. Wandless, ‘Narrative Pain and the Moral Sense: Toward an Ethics of Suffering in the Long Eighteenth Century’, Literature and Medicine 24.1 (2005), pp. 51–69.
William Godwin, Memoirs of the Author of A Vindication of the Rights of Woman, 2nd edn (London: J. Johnson and G. G. and J. Robinson, 1798), p. 151.
See Michel Foucault, Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason, trans. Richard Howard (New York: Random House, 1988), pp. 212–15.
Werter and Charlotte, a German Story (London: J. Parsons, 1786), p. iii. On the influence of Goethe’s novella on British writers see Robyn L. Schiffman, ‘A Concert of Werthers’, ECS 43.2 (2010), pp. 207–22.
Charles Moore, A Full Inquiry into the Subject of Suicide, 2 vols (London: J. R and C. Rivington, 1790), vol. 2, pp. 141–3.
Johann Wilhelm von Archenholtz (ed.), The English Lyceum, 3 vols (Hamburg, 1787–8), vol. 1, p. 260.
See Markman Ellis, The Politics of Sensibility: Race, Gender and Commerce in the Sentimental Novel (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 38–43.
See John Brewer, ‘“Love and Madness”: Sentimental Narratives and the Spectacle of Suffering in Late-Eighteenth-Century Romance’, in Peter de Bolla, Nigel Leask and David Simpson (eds), Land, Nation and Culture, 1740–1840: Thinking the Republic of Taste (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004), pp. 131–47
Maximillian E. Novak, ‘The Sensibility of Sir Herbert Croft in Love and Madness and the “Life of Edward Young”’, The Age of Johnson 8 (1997), pp. 189–207
Robert Miles, ‘Forging a Romantic Identity: Herbert Croft’s Love and Madness and W. H. Ireland’s Shakespeare MS’, ECF 17.4 (2005), pp. 599–627
Kelly McGuire, ‘True Crime: Contagion, Print Culture, and Herbert Croft’s Love and Madness; or, A Story Too True’, ECF 24 (2011), pp. 55–75.
Although informally known already, Croft’s authorship was officially acknowledged in 1782: see Robert J. Griffin, ‘Fact, Fiction, and Anonymity: Reading Love and Madness: A Story Too True (1780)’, ECF 16.4 (2004), pp. 619–37.
Brian Goldberg, ‘Romantic Professionalism in 1800: Robert Southey, Herbert Croft, and the Letters and Legacy of Thomas Chatterton’, ELH 63.3 (1996), pp. 681–706
Michael MacDonald and Terence R. Murphy, Sleepless Souls: Suicide in Early Modern England (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990), pp. 144–76.
See Brian Goldberg, The Lake Poets and Professional Identity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), p. 213.
Works, vol. 2, pp. 1,079-80. J. H. Ingram, The True Chatterton (London: George G. Harrap & Company, 1910), pp. 295–304
Esther P. Ellinger, Thomas Chatterton, The Marvelous Boy (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1930), pp. 55–75.
Andrew Kippis, Biographia Britannica, 2nd edn, 5 vols (London: C. Bathurst, 1778–93), vol. 3, p. viii
Giuseppe Parmi, A Fashionable Day (London: G. Kearsley and R. Faulder, 1780), p. 48.
See J. J. Murphy, Children’s Handkerchiefs, a Two Hundred Year History (Atglen, PA: Schiffer Publishing, 1998)
Mary Schoeser, Printed Handkerchiefs (London: Museum of London, 1988).
Thomas Park noted the resemblance to Hogarth’s print: GM 69.1 (1799), pp. 385–6. See also William L. Pressly The Artist as Original Genius: Shakespeare’s ‘Fine Frenzy’ in Late-Eighteenth-Century British Art (Delaware: University of Delaware Press, 2007), pp. 163–83.
Life, p. 475. See Richard D. Altick, The English Common Reader: A Social History of the Mass Reading Public, 1800–1900 (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1957), p. 176
Robert W. Uphaus, ‘Vicesimus Knox and the Canon of Eighteenth-Century Literature’, The Age of Johnson 4 (1991), pp. 345–61.
Vicesimus Knox, ‘On Novel Reading’, Essays Moral and Literary, 2 vols (London: Edward and Charles Dilly 1778), vol. 2, pp. 185–93
John Trussler, Chronology; or, the Historian’s Vade-Mecum, 10th edn, 2 vols (London: R. Baldwin, 1782), vol. 2, p. 32.
David Erskine Baker, Biographia Dramatica, or, a Companion to the Playhouse, 2 vols (London: Mess. Rivingtons, T. Payne and Son, L. Davis et al., 1782), vol. 1, pp. 73–4.
Mrs Bonhote, The Parental Monitor, 2 vols (London: William Lane, 1788), vol. 2, pp. 106–7.
John Paterson Service, Recreation for Youth (London: G. Kearsley, 1787), pp. 116–17.
Joseph Robertson, The Parian Chronicle (London: J. Walter, 1788), pp. 203–5.
Charles Gower, The Lounger’s Miscellany (London: T and J. Egerton, 1788–9), p. 18.
Vicesimus Knox, ‘On the Old English Poets’, Essays Moral and Literary, 2nd edn, 2 vols (London: Edward and Charles Dilly, 1779), vol. 1, p. 291.
Vicesimus Knox, ‘On the Poems attributed to Rowley’, Essays Moral and Literary, 3rd edn, 2 vols (London: Charles Dilly, 1782), vol. 2, pp. 247–51
Richard Terry, Poetry and the Making of the English Literary Past, 1660–1781 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), p. 311.
Erik Erämetsä, A Study of the’ sentimental’ and of other Linguistic Characteristics of Eighteenth Century Sentimentalism in England (Helsinki: Academia Scientiarum Fennica, 1951), pp. 85–6.
Knox, ‘An Idea of a Patriot’, Essays (1782), vol. 1, pp. 39–44
Knox, ‘On the Advantage which may be derived to the Tender and Pathetic Style, from using the Words and Phrases of Scripture’, Essays (1782), vol. 2, pp. 286–9
Vicesimus Knox, The Works of Vicesimus Knox, D.D., 7 vols (London: J. Mawman, 1824), vol. 1, p. 131.
W. G. Constable, John Flaxman: 1755–1826 (London: University of London Press, 1927), p. 25
David Irwin, John Flaxman 1755–1826: Sculptor, Illustrator, Designer (London: Studio Vista, 1979), p. 14.
Sarah Symmons, ‘The Spirit of Despair: Patronage, Primitivism and the Art of John Flaxman’, Burlington Magazine 117 (1975), pp. 644–50.
Philip Thicknesse, Memoirs and Anecdotes of Philip Thicknesse, 2 vols (London: Printed for the author, 1788–90), vol. 2, pp. 299–313.
Richard Jenkins, The Ode, Songs, Chorusses, &c. for the concert in commemoration of Chatterton, the celebrated Bristol poet (London: J. Bew, 1784), pp. 11
Robert W. Jones, ‘We Proclaim our Darling Son’: The Politics of Chatterton’ s Memory during the War for America’, RES 53 (2002), pp. 373–95.
See Thomas Lockwood, Post-Augustan Satire: Charles Churchill and Satirical Poetry 1750–1800 (Seattle and London: University of Washington Press, 1979), pp. 18–20.
T S. Surr, George Barnwell: a novel, 3 vols (London: H. D. Symonds, 1798), vol. 1, p. 194.
James Boswell, The Life of Samuel Johnson, 3rd edn, 4 vols (London: Charles Dilly, 1799), vol. 4, p. 196.
George Gregory, The Life of Thomas Chatterton (London: G. Kearsley, 1789), p. 56.
Isaac D’Israeli, An Essay on the Manners and Genius of the Literary Character (London: T. Cadell and W. Davies, 1795), p. 210.
Robert Fellowes suggested that Chatterton’s ‘sensations are so tremblingly delicate’, but explicitly chastised unfeeling patrons such as Walpole for his demise: MMr 8 (1799), pp. 143–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Daniel Cook
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cook, D. (2013). ‘Too proud for pity’: The Sentimental Reader. In: Thomas Chatterton and Neglected Genius, 1760–1830. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137332493_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137332493_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-46176-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-33249-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)